Skip to main content
Log in

The Evolution of Anisogamy: More Questions than Answers

  • Long Article
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite a revived interest in explaining the evolution of anisogamy in recent years (i.e. different—micro and macrogametes), there remain more questions than answers. The topic is important because it is thought to be the foundation of the theory of gender differences and relations. Twelve of these questions are briefly reviewed here—(1) the distinction between sex and sexual types; (2) the distinction between mating types and anisogamy; (3) the possible role of ecological as well as social evolution in proto-gender differences and relations; (4) the life history strategies involved; (5) whether the relevant social relationships are based on conflict or cooperation; (6) the origin and properties of meiosis; (7) the conformity of theories with sex allocation theory; (8) the relevance of multiple levels of selection; (9) appropriate modelling strategies; (10) the relationship between the kind of gametes produced and secondary sexual characteristics; (11) the relevance to humans; and (12) how realistic the search for a single explanation is. It is concluded that polarized sexuality may be a form of trade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell G (1978) The evolution of anisogamy. J Theor Biol 73:247–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell G (1993) The sexual nature of the eukaryote genome. J Hered 84:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Billiard S, López-Villavicencio M, Devier B, Hood ME, Fairhead C, Giraud T (2011) Having sex, yes, but with whom? Inferences from fungi on the evolution of anisogamy and mating types. Biol Rev 86:421–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) (2009) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Blute M (2010) Darwinian sociocultural evolution: solutions to dilemmas in cultural and social theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer MG, Parker GA (2002) The evolution of anisogamy: a game-theoretic approach. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:2381–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1978) The population genetics of anisogamy. J Theor Biol 73:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov EL (1982) The theory of sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1992) Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q Rev Biol 67:437–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagg J (2012) The paradox of sexual reproduction and levels of selection: can sociobiology shed a light? Philos Theory Biol 4:e301

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (2000) Selection for high gamete encounter rates explains the success of male and female mating types. J Theor Biol 202:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (2002) Ecological models explaining the success of distinctive sperm and eggs (oogamy). J Theor Biol 219:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (2006) Selection for high gamete encounter rates explains the evolution of anisogamy using plausible assumptions about size relationships of swimming speed and duration. J Theor Biol 241:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (2009) Living at micro scale. Harvard University Press, Harvard

    Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (2011) Gamete encounters. In: Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 168–193

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen T, Robles J (2012) The evolution of parental investment: re-examining the anisogamy argument. J Theor Biol 299:113–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epelman MA, Pollock S, Netter B, Low BS (2005) Anisogamy, expenditure of reproductive effort, and the optimality of having two sexes. Oper Res 53:560–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faundes V, Pardo A (2010) Biological basis of human mate choice: the triple A theory. Biol Theory 5:106–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (1974) The economy of nature and the evolution of sex. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin MT (2010) The distinction between primary and secondary sexual characters. In: Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 9–14

  • Hawkes K, Connell JF, Blurton Jones NG, Alvarez H, Charnov EL (1998) Grandmothering, menopause, and the evolution of human life histories. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:1336–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey DA, Rose MR (1988) The role of gene transfer in the evolution of eukaryotic sex. In: Michod RE, Levin BR (eds) The evolution of sex. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, pp 161–175

  • Hoekstra RF (1982) On the asymmetry of sex: evolution of mating types in isogamous populations. J Theor Biol 98:427–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra RF (1987) The evolution of sexes. In: Stearns SC (ed) The evolution of sex and its consequences. Birkhãuser Verlag, Basel, pp 59–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra RF (1990) The evolution of male–female dimorphism: older than sex? J Genet 69:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra RF (2011) Nucleo-cytoplasmic conflict and the evolution of gamete dimorphism. In: Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra RF, Iwasa Y, Weissing FJ (1991) The origin of isogamous sexual differentiation. In: Selten R (ed) Evolution and game dynamics. Springer, Berlin, pp 155–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LD (1995) Selfish genetic elements and their role in evolution: the evolution of sex and some of what it entails. Proc R Soc Lond B 349:321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LD (1996) Why are there only two sexes. Proc R Soc Lond B 263:415–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst LD, Hamilton WD (1992) Cytoplasmic fusion and the nature of sexes. Proc R Soc Lond B 247:189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer P, Roughgarden J (2008) Gametic conflict versus contact in the evolution of anisogamy. Theor Popul Biol 73:461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirk DL (2006) Oogamy: inventing the sexes. Curr Biol 16:R1028–R1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen J, Kokko H (2011) Two roads to two sexes: unifying gamete competition and gamete limitation in a single model of anisogamy evolution. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:445–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen J, Jennions MD, Kokko H (2012) The many costs of sex. Trends Ecol Evol 27:172–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard JL (2010) The evolution of sexes, anisogamy, and sexual systems. In: Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 15–39

  • Leonard JL, Córdoba-Aguilar A (eds) (2010) The evolution of primary sexual characters in animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells CM, Snook RR, Hosken DJ (2009) The evolutionary origin and maintenance of sperm: selection for a small, motile gamete mating type. In: Birkhead TR, Hosken DJ, Pitnick S (eds) Sperm biology: an evolutionary perspective. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 43–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H, Abrams PA (1999) Why are equally sized gametes so rare? The instability of isogamy and the cost of anisogamy. Evol Ecol Res 1:769–784

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H, Abrams PA (2011) The evolutionary instability of isogamy. In: Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 75–95

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J (1978) The evolution of sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. WH Freeman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Meirmans S, Meirmans PG, Kirkendall LR (2012) The costs of sex: facing real-world complexities. Q Rev Biol 87:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, Hammerstein P (1994) Biological markets: supply and demand determine the effect of partner choice in cooperation, mutualism and mating. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 35:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, Hammerstein P (1995) Biological markets. Trends Ecol Evol 10:336–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë R, Van Hooff JARAM, Hammerstein P (eds) (2001) Economics in nature: social dilemmas, mate choice and biological markets. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha S (2006) Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1978) Selection on non-random fusion of gametes during the evolution of anisogamy. J Theor Biol 73:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA (1984) The producer/scrounger model and its relevance to sexuality. In: Barnard CJ (ed) Producers and scroungers: strategies of exploitation and parasitism. Croom Helm Ltd, London, pp 127–152

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker GA et al (1972) The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male–female phenomenon. J Theor Biol 36:529–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randerson JP, Hurst LD (2001) The uncertain evolution of the sexes. Trends Ecol Evol 16:571–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J (2009) The genial gene: deconstructing Darwinian selfishness. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Iyer P (2011) Contact, not conflict, causes the evolution of anisogamy. In: Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 96–110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden J, Oishi M, Akcay E (2006) Reproductive social behavior: cooperative games to replace sexual selection. Science 311:965–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueffler C, Van Dooren TJM, Leimar O, Abrams PA (2006) Disruptive selection and then what? Trends Ecol Evol 21:238–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schärer L, Rowe L, Arnqvist G (2012) Anisogamy, chance and the evolution of sex roles. Trends Ecol Evol 27:260–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Togashi T, Bartelt JL (2011) Evolution of anisogamy and related phenomena in marine green algae. In: Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 194–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Togashi T, Cox PA (eds) (2011) The evolution of anisogamy: a fundamental phenomenon underlying sexual selection. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Togashi T, Nagisa M, Miyazaki T, Yoshimura J, Tainaka K, Bartlet JL, Cox PA (2008) Effects of gamete behavior and density on fertilization success in marine green algae: insights from three-dimensional numerical simulations. Aquat Ecol 42:355–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine Transaction, Chicago, pp 136–179

    Google Scholar 

  • West SA (2009) Sex allocation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl EG, Frederickson ME, Yu DW, Pierce NE (2010) Economic contract theory tests models of mutualism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:15712–15716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham R (2009) Catching fire: how cooking made us human. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2010) Cooperation and the evolution of anisogamy. J Theor Biol 264:24–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Blute.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blute, M. The Evolution of Anisogamy: More Questions than Answers. Biol Theory 7, 3–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0060-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0060-4

Keywords

Navigation