Skip to main content
Log in

Development of sustainability evaluation model for implementing product service systems

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new business model, product service systems, is proposed to promote a shift in focus from selling purely products to selling functions. This is achieved through a mix of products and services that fulfill the same consumer demands, while eliciting less environmental impact. Development of product service systems has become an increasingly important strategy in achieving social, economic, and environmental sustainability because product service systems advocates reducing resource consumption, while delivering better and more widely available goods and services. This paper proposes an evaluation framework of sustainable performance to implement product service systems. A literature review discusses 32 criteria categorized into two aspects: product and organization. The fuzzy Delphi method is then applied to identify the consistency of criteria. The relative weights of the selected criteria are determined using Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Results indicate that the top three criteria in product aspect are maintenance system (weight = 0.172), use time or frequency (weight = 0.145), and price of the product (weight = 0.132). For the organization aspect, the top three criteria are integrated service plan (weight = 0.197), product development and design (weight = 0.144) and optimized transportation network (weight = 0.089). The demand for implementing product service systems is completely different from selling traditional goods because product service systems must consider the issue of sustainability. The proposed evaluation framework can help companies identify the potential products suitable in implementing product service systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartolomeo M, dal Maso D, de Jong P, Eder P, Groenewegen P, Hopkinson P, James P, Nijhuis L, Örninge M, Scholl G, Slob A, Zarign O (2003) Eco-efficient producer services-what are they, how do they benefit customers and the environment and how likely are they to develop and be extensively utilized? J Clean Prod 11(8):829–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Besch K (2005) Product-service systems for office furniture: barriers and opportunities on the European market. J Clean Prod 13(10–11):1083–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan FTS, Kumar N (2007) Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega Int J Manag Sci 35(4):417–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang PT, Huang LC, Lin HJ (2000) The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets Syst 112(3):511–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charter M, Tischner U (2001) Sustainable solutions: developing products and services for the future. Greenleaf, Sheffield

  • Csutora R, Buckley JJ (2001) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method. Fuzzy Sets Syst 120(2):181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalkey N, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci 9(3):458–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodić SN, Vučurović DE, Popov SD, Dodić JM, Zavargo ZZ (2010) Concept of cleaner production in Vojvodina. Renew Sust Energ Rev 14(6):1629–1634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop MJ, van Halen CJG, te Riele HRM, Rommens PJM (1999) Product service systems, ecological and economic basics. PRe consultants, Amersfoort, The Netherlands

  • Halme M, Anttonen M, Hrauda G, Kortman J (2006) Sustainability evaluation of European household services. J Clean Prod 14(17):1529–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillary R (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise. J Clean Prod 12(4):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW, Hu AH (2009) Applying hazardous substance management to supplier selection using analytic network process. J Clean Prod 17(2):255–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Lin MJ (1986) Group decision making under multiple criteria: methods and applications. Springer, New York

  • Ishikawa A, Amagasa M, Shiga T, Tomizawa G, Tatsuta R, Mieno H (1993) The max–min Delphi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy integration. Fuzzy Sets Syst 55(3):241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ruan D (2004) Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: the case of Turkey. Int J Prod Econ 87(2):171–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1988) Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Elsevier Science Inc., New York

  • Kuo YF, Chen PC (2008) Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Syst Appl 35(4):1930–1939

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwong CK, Bai H (2003) Determining the important weights for the customer requirement in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Trans 35(7):619–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeta J (2006) Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technol Forecast Soc Change 73(5):467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee HI, Chen WC, Chang CJ (2008) A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan. Expert Syst Appl 34(1):96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee AHI, Wang WM, Lin TY (2010) An evaluation framework for technology transfer of new equipment in high technology industry. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(1):135–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Vezzoli C (2003) A strategic design approach to develop sustainable product service systems: examples taken from the ‘environmentally friendly innovation’ Italian prize. J Clean Prod 11(8):851–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E, Collina L, Evans S (2004) Solution oriented partnership, how to design industrialised sustainable solutions. Cranfield University, Cranfield

  • Maxwell D, Sheate W, van der Vorst R (2006) Functional and systems aspects of the sustainable product and service development approach for industry. J Clean Prod 4(17):1466–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade L, Sarkis J (1998) Strategic analysis of logistics and supply chain management systems using analytic network process. Transp Res Pt E Logist Transp Rev 34(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meijkamp R (1994) Service-products, a sustainable approach? A case study on call-a-car in the Netherlands. In: The Eco-Efficient Services seminar at the Wuppertal Institute

  • Mejcamp R (2000) Changing consumer behavior through eco-efficient services: an empirical study on car sharing in the netherlands. Ph.D. dissertation, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands

  • Mont O (2002) Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J Clean Prod 10(3):237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont O (2003) Editorial for the special issue of the journal of cleaner production on product service systems. J Clean Prod 11(8):815–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont O (2006) Dalhammar C, Jacobsson N. A new business model for baby prams based on leasing and product remanufacturing. J Clean Prod 14(17):1509–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray TJ, Pipino LL, van Gigch JP (1985) A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi. Hum Syst Manag 5:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiffert MEB (2008) Environmental impact evaluation using a cooperative model for implementing EMS (ISO 14001) in small and medium-sized enterprises. J Clean Prod 16(14):1447–1461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen YC, Chang SH, Lin GTR, Yu HC (2010) A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(1):151–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shih LH, Chen JL, Tu JC, Kuo TC, Hu AH, Lin SL (2009) An integrated approach for product service system development (II): evaluation phase. J Environ Eng Manag 19(6):343–356

    Google Scholar 

  • SusProNet (2003) Network on sustainable product service system development. http://www.suspronet.org

  • SusProNet (2004) New Business for Old Europe. Europe, European Community. http://www.suspronet.org

  • Tischner U (2004) SusProNet results need area offices. Suspronet Dissemination Event, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A (2003) CO2 reduction from household consumption by PSS. TNO/Co-ordinator SusProNet Sustainable Consumption Workshop, Tokyo

  • Tukker A (2004) Eight types of product service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet. Bus Strategy Environ 13(4):246–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Tischner U (2004) New Business for Old Europe- Product-service development as a mean to enhance competitiveness and eco-efficiency. Final Report of SusProNet

  • Tukker A, Tischner U (2006) Product-services as a research field: past, present and future. Reflections from a decade of research. J Clean Prod 14(17):1552–1556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP & PSS (2001) UNEP and Product Service Systems. http://www.uneptie.org/pc/sustain/design/design.htm

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (1997) Sustainable service design, United Nations environment programme. UN Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei WL, Chang WC (2008) Analytic network process-based model for selecting an optimal product design solution with zero-one goal programming. J Eng Des 19(1):15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei CC, Chien CF, Wang MJ (2005) An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection. Int J Prod Econ 96(1):47–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White AL, Stoughton M, Feng L (1999) Servicizing: the quiet transition to extended product responsibility. Report Submitted to US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste

  • Williams A (2006) Product-service systems in the automotive industry: the case of micro-factory retailing. J Clean Prod 14(2):172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Moore P, Pu JS, Wong CB (2009) A practical methodology for realizing product service systems for consumer products. Comput Ind Eng 56(1):224–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng SX, Ta CM, Tam VWY, Deng ZM (2005) Towards implementation of ISO 14001 environmental management systems in selected industries in China. J Clean Prod 13(7):645–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is a partial result of the project NSC96-2621-Z-027-001-MY3, supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan. The constructive comments of the editor and the reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. W. Hsu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Allen Hu, H., Chen, S.H., Hsu, C.W. et al. Development of sustainability evaluation model for implementing product service systems. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 9, 343–354 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0037-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-012-0037-7

Keywords

Navigation