Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental concern with the treatment and final disposal of municipal solid waste (MSW) generated in cities has increased worldwide. In São Paulo, the largest Latin America’s city, the landfills use is preponderant and initiatives that incorporate treatment technologies that recover recyclable materials, compost, and generate energy are incipient. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to assess the treatment technologies for integrated MSW management and propose the optimal scenario that increases materials recovery and reduce the current landfill disposal, with the objective of postponing its lifetime. To achieve the result proposed, five scenarios were modeled and compared with the current scenario, which is (1) 2% of selective collection and 98% to the landfill. The other scenarios were: (2) Scenario 1 added by 4 mechanical biological treatment units (MBT); (3) Fivefold increasing of the selective collection, added by 2 Thermal Treatment Units (WtE); (4) 2% of selective collection, 2 MBTs and 2 WtEs; and (5) same of Scenario 2, but without compost sale. Considering environmental, financial, social, and technical factors of each scenario, the TOPSIS method was used, which orders the preference for similarity of the ideal solution. As a result, the Scenario 2 was the optimal solution, diverting 70% of MSW from landfill.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrantes JM (2016) Avaliação técnica e económica da aplicação de sistemas Waste to Energy no tratamento de resíduos urbanos em aglomerados de média e pequena dimensão. s.l.: s.n

  • ABRELPE (2020) Panorama dos Resíduos Sólidos no Brasil. São Paulo: s.n

  • Ali Y, Aslam MZ, Dar H, Mumtaz U (2018) A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point. Environ Syst Decis 38:528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonopoulos IS, Perkoulidis G, Logothetis D, Karkanias C (2014) Ranking municipal solid waste treatment alternatives considering sustainability criteria using the analytical hierarchical process tool. Resour Conserv Recycl 86:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BRASIL (2019) Dispõe sobre a qualificação de projetos para ampliação da capacidade de recuperação energética de resíduos sólidos urbanos no âmbito do Programa de Parcerias de Investimentos da Presidência da República. Available https://www2.camara.leg.br/legin/fed/decret/2019/decreto-10117-19-novembro-2019-789428-norma-pe.html

  • Caudaglio A, Cytrynowicz R (2012) Limpeza Urbana na Cidade de São Paulo: uma história para contar. Via Impressa Edições de Arte, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • CETESB (2014) Companhia Ambiental do Estado de São Paulo. Available http://cetesb.sp.gov.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/DD-326-2014-I.pdf. Acesso em 15 Junho 2019

  • Christensen TH (2011) Solid waste technology & management, 1st edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Coban A, Ertis EF, Cavdaroglu NA (2018) Municipal solid waste management via multi-criteria decigion making methods: a case study in Istambul, Turkey. J Clean Prod 180:159–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colturato L (2018) Capacitação sobre a Nota Técnica nº 164/2018-MP—Diretrizes à estruturação de projetos relacionados ao manejo dos resíduos sólidos urbanos (RSU) no âmbito do FEP. s.l.: s.n

  • Cooperativas (2019) Entrevistas com Lideres de Cooperativas. s.l.: s.n

  • Ecourbis Ambiental (2019) Ecourbis Ambiental S.A.. Acesso em 8 Novembro 2019

  • Favoino E, Confalonieri A, Boyer F (2013) Development of Legal Framework on Bio-Waste Management and Establishment of Quality Assurance System for Compost and National Organisation of Quality Assurance for the Compost. s.l.: s.n.

  • Generowicz A, Kowalski Z, Kulczycka J (2011) Planning of waste management systems in urban area using multi-criteria analysis. J Environ Prot 2:736–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghinea C, Gavrilescu M (2016) Costs analysis of municipal solid waste management scenarios: IASI—Romania Case Study. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 24:185–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. A state of art survey. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kasa S, Bhada-Tata P (2018) Decision maker’s guides for solid waste management technogies. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghajani Mir M et al (2016) Application of TOPSIS and Vikor improved versions in a multi criteria decision analysis to develop an optimized municipal solid waste management model. J Environ Manag 166:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MMA (2019) Portaria Interminesterial Nº 274. Available https://www.in.gov.br/web/dou/-/portaria-interministerial-n%C2%BA-274-de-30-de-abril-de-2019-86235505

  • MME (2021) Portaria Normativa Nº10 - Ministério das Minas e Energia. Available https://www.in.gov.br/en/web/dou/-/portaria-normativa-n-10-de-30-de-abril-de-2021-317910168. Acesso em 17 Julho 2021

  • Pires A, Chang NB, Martinho G (2011) An AHP-based fuzzy interval TOPSIS assessment for sustainable expansion of the solid waste management system in Setúbal Peninsula, Portugal. Resour Conserv Recycl 56:7–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMSP (2014) Prefeitura Municipal de São Paulo. Available http://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/upload/servicos/conferencia_meio_ambiente/arquivos/PGIRS_geral.pdf. Acesso em 18 Julho 2018

  • PMSP (2018) Prefeitura do Municipio de São Paulo. Available https://www.prefeitura.sp.gov.br/cidade/secretarias/subprefeituras/amlurb/coleta_seletiva//index.php?p=229723. Acesso em 01 Outubro 2018

  • Prakash C, Barua M (2015) Integration of AHP-TOPSIS method for prioritizing the solutions of reverse logistics adoption to overcome its barriers under fuzzy environment. J Manuf Syst 37:599–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, Nova Iorque

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces. 24(6):19–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Huang JJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making methods and applications. Taylor e Francis Group, Flórida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2018) Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. s.l.: s.n.

  • Vucijak B, Kurtagic SM, Silajdzic I (2016) Multicriteria decision making in selecting best solid waste management scenario: a municipal case study from Bosnia and Herzegovina. J Clean Prod 130:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2018) Municipal Solid Waste Management a road map for reform for policy makers. s.l.: s.n.

  • Zaman AU, Laehmann S (2013) The zero waste index: a performance measurement tool for waste management systems in a ‘zero waste city.’ J Clean Prod 50:123–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Ecourbis Ambiental S.A., that became possible several technical visits in municipal waste treatment plants, as also the availability data from the gravimetric studies. This research is also approved by CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, E., Mondelli, G. Assessment of integrated MSW management using multicriteria analysis in São Paulo City. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 19, 7981–7992 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03681-9

Keywords

Navigation