Abstract
Reconfigurable manufacturing systems (RMS) are considered as next generation manufacturing systems that are capable of providing the functionality and capacity as and when required. Products are classified into several part families as per customer requirement and each of them are a set of similar products. In a shop floor, the manufacturers have to deal with varied number of orders for multiple part families and after completing the orders of a particular family, they need to change over to the orders of a different part family. Shifting from one part family to another may require the system’s reconfiguration, which is a complicated method and requires tremendous cost and efforts. The complexity, effort and cost from changing one configuration to another depends on the existing initial configuration and the new configuration required for subsequent production of orders belonging to a different part family. This paper focuses on determining optimal configuration of an RMS required for different part family on the basis of minimum loss occurred for a given system configuration. The proposed methodology is explained and an example is given for illustration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M.G. Mehrabi, A.G. Ulsoy, Y. Koren, P. Heytler, Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. J. Intell. Manuf. 13, 135–146 (2002)
H.A. ElMaraghy, Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 17(4), 261–276 (2006)
R. Galen, J. Racero, I. Eguia, J. Garcia, A systematic approach for product families formation in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 23(5), 489–502 (2007)
R.B. Aronson, Operation plug-and-play is on the way. Manuf. Eng. 118(3), 108–112 (1997)
G.H. Lee, Reconfigurability consideration design of components and manufacturing systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 13, 376–386 (1997)
Y. Koren, U. Heisel, F. Jovane, T. Moriwaki, G. Pritschow, G. Ulsoy, H. Van Brussel, Reconfiguration manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann. 48, 1–14 (1999)
F. Hasan, P.K. Jain, D. Kumar, An approach towards scalability for reconfigurable product flow line through unbalancing. Int. J. Model. Oper. Manag. 3(2), 118–133 (2013)
K. Rakesh, P.K. Jain, N.K. Mehta, A framework for simultaneous recognition of part families and operation groups for driving a reconfigurable manufacturing system. Adv. Prod. Eng. Manag. 5(1), 45–58 (2010)
Y. Koren, S.J. Hu, T.W. Weber, Impact of manufacturing system configuration on performance. CIRP Ann. 47(1), 369–372 (1998)
V. Maier-Speredelozzi, Y. Koren, S.J. Hu, Convertibility measures for manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann. 52(1), 367–370 (2003)
P. Spicer, Y. Koren, M. Shpitalni, D. Yip-Hoi, Design principles for machining system configurations. CIRP Ann. 51(1), 275–280 (2002)
S. Yang, S.J. Hu, Productivity analysis of a six CNC machine manufacturing system with configurations, Proceedings of the 2000 Japan–USA Flexible Automation Conference, Michigan (2000)
A.M.A. Youssef, H.A. ElMaraghy, Assessment of manufacturing systems reconfiguration smoothness. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 30(1–2), 174–193 (2006)
A.M.A. Youssef, Optimal Configuration Selection for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Thesis (Ph.D.). (University of Windsor, 2006)
Y. Yamada, K. Ookoudo, Y. Komura, Layout optimization of manufacturing cells and allocation optimization of transport robots in Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems using particle swarm optimization, IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (2003)
K.K. Goyal, P.K. Jain, M. Jain, Multiple objective optimization of reconfigurable manufacturing system, Proceedings of the International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving, ed. by K. Deep, et al. (Springer, Berlin, 2011)
K.K. Goyal, P.K. Jain, M. Jain, Optimal configuration selection for reconfigurable manufacturing system using NSGA II and TOPSIS. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(15), 4175–4191 (2012)
K.K. Mittal, P.K. Jain, An overview of performance measures in reconfigurable manufacturing system. Proc. Eng. 69, 1125–1129 (2014)
K.K. Mittal, P.K. Jain, Impact of reconfiguration effort on reconfigurable manufacturing system, 5th International and 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR) (IIT Guwahati, 2014)
T. Ohiro, M.K Myreshka, K. Takahashi, A stochastic model for deciding an optimal production order and its corresponding configuration in a reconfigurable manufacturing system with multiple product groups, Proceedings of the CIRP 2nd International Conference on reconfigurable manufacturing, Michigan (2003)
M.G. Mehrabi, K. Ulsoy, Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. J. Intell. Manuf. 11, 403–419 (2000)
R. Drtina, H.L. Correa, How transfer prices can affect a supply chain strategic decision. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 8(4), 363–376 (2011)
K.K. Mittal, V. Verma, Lean manufacturing system for air cleaner assembly cell. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 23(3), 314–328 (2016)
A.M.A. Youssef, H.A. ElMaraghy, Optimal configuration selection for Reconfigurable Manufacturing. Int. J. Flex. Manuf. Syst. 19, 67–106 (2007)
Z. Xiaobo, W. Jiancai, L. Zhenbi, A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system Part 1: a framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(10), 2273–2285 (2000)
Z. Xiaobo, J. Wang, Z. Luo, A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system Part 2: optimal configurations. Int. J. Prod. Res. 38(12), 2829–2842 (2000)
Z. Xiaobo, J. Wang, Z. Luo, A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system Part 3: optimal selection policy. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39(4), 747–758 (2001)
Z. Xiaobo, J. Wang, Z. Luo, A stochastic model of a reconfigurable manufacturing system Part 4: performance measure. Int. J. Prod. Res. 39(6), 1113–1126 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mittal, K.K., Kumar, D. & Jain, P.K. A Systematic Approach for Optimum Configuration Selection in Reconfigurable Manufacturing System. J. Inst. Eng. India Ser. C 99, 629–635 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-017-0369-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40032-017-0369-7