Skip to main content
Log in

Behaviour of Geosynthetic Reinforced Unpaved Roads Under Cyclic Loading

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents, an experimental study on the performance of geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads under cyclic loading. A series of model-scaled tests have been conducted for varied thickness of the aggregate layer and strength of subgrade soil, with reinforcement at the interface. The reinforcement is found to have reduced the settlement substantially. However, for maximum performance improvement the thickness of the aggregate subbase appears to be equal to about the diameter of the loading area. A comparison with the unreinforced case indicates that for a given settlement, provision of reinforcement can reduce the aggregate thickness almost by about 50 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Love JP, Burd HJ, Milligan WE, Houlsby GT (1987) Analytical and model studies of reinforcement of a layer of granular fill on soft clay subgrade. Can Geotech J 24:611–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Miura N, Sakai A, Taesiri Y, Yamanouchi T, Yasuhara K (1990) Polymer grid reinforced pavement on soft clay grounds. Geotext Geomembr 9:99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alenowicz J, Dembicki E (1991) Recent laboratory research on unpaved road behaviour. Geotext Geomembr 10:21–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Puri VK, Yen SC, Das BM, Yeo B (1993) Cyclic load-induced settlement of a square foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 12:587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fannin RJ, Sigurdsson O (1996) Field observations on stabilization of unpaved roads with geosythetics. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122:544–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Som N, Sahu RB (1999) Bearing capacity of a geotextile reinforced unpaved road as a function of deformation: a model study. Geosynth Int 6:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  7. Giroud JP, Noiray L (1981) Geotextile-reinforced unpaved road design. J Geotech Eng ASCE 107:1233–1254

    Google Scholar 

  8. Giroud JP, Han J (2004) Design method for geogrid-reinforced unpaved roads. Ι: development of design method. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:775–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Das BM, Shin EC (1994) Strip foudation on geogrid-reinforced clay: behaviour under cyclic loading. Geotext Geomembr 13:657–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Perkins SW (1999) Mechanical response of geosynthetic reinforced flexible pavements. Geosynth Int 6:347–382

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shin EC, Kim DH, Das BM (2002) Geogrid-reinforced railroad bed settlement due to cyclic load. Geotech Geol Eng 20:261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ASTM D2487 (2006) Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA 10.1520/D2487-06E01

  13. Boussinesq J (1883) Application des potentials a l’étude de l’équilibre et du mouvement des solides élastiques. Gauthier-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  14. Omar MT, Das BM, Puri VK, Yen SC (1993) Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Can Geotech J 30:545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IRC: SP:72 (2007) Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements for low volume rural roads. Indian road congress, New Delhi

  16. Milligan GWE, Fannin RJ, Farrar DM (1986) Model and full-scale tests of granular layers reinforced with a geogrid. In: Proceedings of Third International Conference on Geotextiles, Vienna, vol. 1, pp 61–66

  17. Butterfield R (1999) Dimensional analysis for geotechnical engineers. Geotechnique 49(3):357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fakher, A., Jones, C.J.F.P., (1996) Discussion of ‘‘bearing capacity of rectangular footings on geogrid reinforced sand,’’ by Yetimoglu, T., Wu, J.T.H., Saglamer, A. J Geotech Eng ASCE 122 (4), 326–327

  19. Bräu, G., Vogt, S., (2011) Erhöhung der Tragfähigkeit direkt befahrener Schüttungen mit Geokunststoffen–Einsparungen von hochwertigen Dammbaustoffen durch die Erhöhung der Tragfähigkeit von direkt befahrenen Schüttungen mit Geokunststoffen. Forschung Straßenbau und Straßenverkehrstechnik, Vol. 1065, Publisher: NW-Verlag, Bremerhaven, ISBN 978-3-86918-174-5

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research work was undertaken at the Zentrum Geotechnik, Technische Universität München (Technical University of Munich) under Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD) fellowship granted to the first and second authors, Mr. Ravi and Dr. S.K. Dash. The conducted tests are part of a pre-study for a research Project funded by the Federal Highway Research Institute on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Development, Germany [19].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sujit Kumar Dash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ravi, K., Dash, S.K., Vogt, S. et al. Behaviour of Geosynthetic Reinforced Unpaved Roads Under Cyclic Loading. Indian Geotech J 44, 77–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0051-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0051-9

Keywords

Navigation