Abstract
This paper presents an analytical approach to determine the ultimate load-bearing capacity of a footing subjected to a vertical load and resting on the top of a fly ash slope without or with single or multi-layers geogrid reinforcement. The load-bearing capacity values obtained by using the proposed analytical approach were compared with those obtained from experimental and numerical approaches reported recently in the literature. After validation of the analytical values of the load bearing capacity, an empirical formula based on a regression analysis was developed between the bearing capacity ratio and geogrid index (α), which physically signifies the mobilized strength of geogrid reinforcement under a given footing load and is a function of the number of reinforcement layers (N) and the embedment ratio (z/B).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Choudhary AK, Verma BP (2001) Behavior of footing on reinforced sloped fill. In: Proceedings of International conference on Landmarks in Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Kyushu Japan, Nov. 2001, pp 535–539
Choudhary AK, Jha JN, Gill KS (2010) Laboratory investigation of bearing capacity behavior of strip footing on reinforced fly ash slope. Geotext Geomembr 28(4):393–402
Gill KS, Choudhary AK, Jha JN Shukla SK (2013) Large model footing load test on reinforced coal ash slope. Int J Geotech Eng 7(3) (in press)
Gill KS, Choudhary AK, Jha JN Shukla SK (2011) Load bearing capacity of the footing resting on a reinforced fly ash slope. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Geotechnical Engineering (ICAGE), Perth, Australia, Nov. 2011, pp 531–536
Gill KS, Choudhary AK, Jha JN Shukla SK (2012) Load bearing capacity of footing resting on the fly ash slope with multilayer reinforcements. In: Proceedings of GeoCongress 2012 (c) ASCE 2012, Oakland, CA, USA, March 2012 pp 4262–4271
Gill KS, Choudhary AK, Jha JN, Shukla SK (2013) Experimental and numerical studies of loaded strip footing resting on reinforced fly ash slope. Geosynth Int 20(1):13–25
Jha JN, Choudhary AK, Gill KS (2010) Stability of strip footing on reinforced fly ash slope. In: Proceeding 6th International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, vol 2, N. Delhi, India, Nov. 2010, pp 1160–1165
Meyerhof GG (1957) The ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on slopes. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. vol 4, pp 348–386
Vesic AS (1973) Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations, J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE, vol 99, No. SM1, pp 45–73
Kondner RL (1963) Hyperbolic stress strain response of cohesive soil. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 89(1):115–143
Gill KS (2013) Bearing capacity and stability analysis of reinforced fly ash slopes. Ph.D. Thesis, Punjab Technical University, Jalandhar, India
Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Eng Div ASCE 101(GT 12):1257–1276
Murthy BRS, Sridharan A, Singh HR (1993) Analysis of reinforced soil beds. Indian Geotech J 23(4):447–458
Das BM (1999) Principle of foundation Engineering, 4th edn. International Thomson Publishing, Asia, pp 268–279
Shukla SK (2012) Handbook of Geosynthetic Engineering, 2nd edn. ICE Publishing, London
Saran S (2005) Reinforced soil and its engineering application, 1st edn. I. K. International Pvt. Ltd, India, p 222
Huang CC, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9:351–361
Kumar A, Saran S (2001) Isolated strip footing on reinforced sand. Geotech Eng J 32(3):177–189
Singh HR (1988) Bearing capacity of reinforced soil beds. Ph.D. Thesis, IISc, Bangalore, India
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1
Calculation of theoretical bearing capacity of fly ash slopes.
-
Step 1:
Calculation of F cc and F γc [9]
In the present investigation, E = 8,000 kPa, c = 20 kPa, ϕ = 14°, γ = 13.82 kN/m3, ϕ μ = 35°, B = 0.10 m and L = 0.30 m, Substituting the value of ϕ in Eq. (9), we get μ = 0.43. Substituting the value of E and μ in Eq. (8), we get G = 2797.21 kPa.
On substituting the above values in Eqs. (3) and (4), we get I r = 138.66 and I r(cr) = 28.18, respectively. Since in the present case, Ir ≥ Ir(c r), F cc = F qc = F γc = 1
-
Step 2:
Bearing capacity of unreinforced fly ash slopes: For β = 45°, D e /B = 2.0, ϕ = 14°, N cq , = 5.0 and N γq = 1.15 [13]. On substituting these values in Eq. (2), we get, q o = 100.80 kPa
-
Step 3:
Bearing capacity of reinforced fly ash slopes (Single layer). For β = 45°, D e /B = 2.0 and z/B = 1.0.
Using Eqs. (11a) and (10), we get, m = 0.85 and f e = 0.595, respectively. Also for z/B = 1.0, From Fig. 6, A 1 = 0.335, A 2 = 0.175 and A 3 = 0.140. From Fig. 3, X 0 /B = 0.82 and X 0 = 0.082. From Fig. 8, L 0 /B = 2.60 and L 0 = 0.26. Substituting the above values in Eq. (38), we get, q R = 154.60 kPa
-
Step 4:
Bearing capacity of reinforced fly ash slopes (Multiple layer reinforcement). Taking, N = 4, and using Eq. (11a) and from Fig. 6, we get for successive reinforcement layer.
-
For first layer, Z 1 /B = 0.25, m 1 = 0.9625, A 1 = 0.35, A 2 = 0.31 and ΔH 1 = 0.25
-
For second layer, Z 2 /B = 0.50, m 2 = 0.925, A1 = 0.345, A2 = 0.25 and ΔH 2 = 0.25
-
For third layer, Z 3 /B = 1.0, m 3 = 0.85, A 1 = 0.335, A 2 = 0.175 and ΔH 3 = 0.50
-
For fourth layer, Z 4 /B = 1.50, m 4 = 0.575, A 1 = 0.330, A 2 = 0.130 and ΔH 4 = 0.50
-
Substituting the above values in Eq. (43) we get, q uR = 258.05 kPa.
Appendix 2
BCR values based on empirical equation (Table 6).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jha, J.N., Choudhary, A.K., Gill, K.S. et al. Bearing Capacity of a Strip Footing Resting on Reinforced Fly Ash Slope: An Analytical Approach. Indian Geotech J 43, 354–366 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0059-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0059-1