Skip to main content
Log in

Engineering Geological Study of NWCT Tunnel in Iran with Emphasis on Squeezing Problems

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research is concerned with the assessment of squeezing potential along of North Water Convey Tunnel in Iran (NWCT) and its stability analysis has been carried out. In this study, the most suitable methods are utilized for the stability analysis and design of support of the tunnel. For the empirical investigation, the rock mass were classified based on RMR, RMi, GSI and Q systems. The geomechanical properties of the rock mass were determined from the laboratory and field investigations. The results obtained from the analysis show that the tunnel is highly unstable due to the presence of a fault and hence strong supports are need in these regions. Because of high overburden (up to 600 m) and the presence of faults and crushed zones, it was necessary to evaluate squeezing potential along the critical section of the tunnel (Lot2). Therefore, empirical and semi empirical approaches and a new method as critical strain have been used for evaluation of squeezing potential. Some experimental equations were used for estimation of critical strain and also Flac2D program has been used to calculate tunnel convergence. Consequently, squeezing index was estimated. This index is used for determination of squeezing degree. As a result, fair squeezing potential was found in crushed zones along the tunnel route.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aydan O, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1993) The squeezing potential of rocks around tunnels; theory and prediction. Rock Mech Rock Eng 26(2):137–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aydan Ö, Akagi T, Kawamoto T (1996) The squeezing potential of rock around tunnels: theory and prediction with examples taken from Japan. Rock Mech Rock Eng 29:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aydan O, Ulusay R, Kawamoto T (1997) Assessment of rock mass strength for underground excavation. In: 36th US rock mechanics symposium, pp 777–786

  4. Aydan O, Dalgic S (1998) Prediction of deformation behavior of 3 lanes Bolu tunnels through squeezing rocks of North Anotolian Fault Zone (NAFZ). In: Proceedings of the regional symposium on sedimentary rock engineering, Taipei, pp 228–233

  5. Aydan O, Ulusay R, Kawamoto T (1997) Assessment of rock mass strength for underground excavation. In: 36th US rock mechanics symposium, pp 777–786

  6. Amadei B, Stephansson O (1997) Rock stress and its measurement, 1st edn. Chapman & Hall, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Barla G (1995) Squeezing rocks in tunnels. ISRM News J 3(4):44–49

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barton N, Grimstad E (1994) The Q-system following twenty years of application in NMT support selection. Felsbau 12(6):428–436

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Bieniawski ZT (1974) Geomechanics classification of rock masses and its application in tunneling. In: Proceedings of the third international congress on rock mechanics, vol 11A. International Society of Rock Mechanics, Denver, pp 27–32

  11. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications. Wiley, New York, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barton N, Lien R, Lunde J (1974) Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Int J Rock Mech 4:189–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Barton N (2000) TBM tunnelling in jointed and faulted rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 169

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bieniawski ZT (1978) Determining rock mass deformability: experience from case histories. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 15(5):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):185–216

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dube AK (1993) Squeezing under high stress conditions, assessment and prevention of failure phenomena in rock engineering. In: Pasamehmetoglu AK et al (eds) Mine Planning and Equipment Selection. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  17. Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithakan AG (1995) Tunnelling through the young Himalayas a case history of the Maneri–Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 39(1–2):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grimstad E, Barton N (1993) Updating the Q-system for NMT. Norwegian Concrete Association, Oslo, p 20

    Google Scholar 

  19. Genis M, Basarir H, Ozarslan A, Bilir E, Balaban E (2007) Engineering geological appraisal of the rock masses and preliminary support design, Dorukhan Tunnel, Zonguldak, Turkey. Eng Geol 92:14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithakan AG (1995) Tunnelling through the young Himalayas a case history of the Maneri–Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 39(1–2):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goel RK, Jethwa JL, Paithakan AG (1995) Tunnelling through the young Himalayas a case history of the Maneri–Uttarkashi power tunnel. Eng Geol 39(1–2):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ghiasi V, Omar Husaini, Rostami J, Zainuddin B Md, Yusoff SG, Bujang KH, Ratnasamy M (2011) Geotechnical and geological studies of NWCT tunnel in Iran focusing on the stabilization analysis and design of support. Sci Res Essays 6(1):79–97

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoek E (1994) Strength of rock and rock masses. ISRM News J 2(2):4–16

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoek E, Kaiser PK, Bawden WF (1995) Support of underground excavations in hard rock. Balkema, Rotterdam, p 215

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion, 2002 edn, vol 1. In: Proceedings of 5th North American rock mechanics symposium, Toronto, Canada, pp 267–273

  26. Hoek E, Marinos P (2000) Predicting tunnel squeezing problems in weak heterogeneous rock masses. In: Tunnels and tunnelling international, pp 45–51, 33–36

  27. Itascaa Consulting Group Inc (2007) Flac2D version 7. Itascaa Consulting Group Inc, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jethwa JL, Singh B, Singh B (1984) Estimation of ultimate rock pressure for tunnel linings under squeezing rock conditions—a new approach. In: Brown ET Hudson JA (eds) Design and performance of underground excavations, ISRM symposium, Cambridge, pp 231–238

  29. Kalamaris GS, Bieniawski ZT (1995) A rock mass strength concept for coal incorporating the effect of time. In: Proceedings of the eighth international congress on rock mechanics, vol 1. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 295–302

  30. Khanlari G, Meybodi RG, Mokhtari E (2012) Engineering geological study of the second part of water supply Karaj to Tehran tunnel with emphasis on squeezing problems. Eng Geol 9–17. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.07.002

  31. Mair K, Elphick S, Main I (2002) Influence of confining pressure on the mechanical and structural evolution of laboratory deformation bands. Geophys Res Lett 29(10):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  32. Palmstrom A (1995) RMi: a rock mass characterization system for rock engineering purposes. PhD thesis, Oslo University, Norway, pp 400

  33. Palmstrom A (2000) On classification systems. In: Proceedings of the geological engineering, 2000, Melbourne, Australia

  34. Rasouli M (2009) Engineering geological studies of the diversion tunnel, focusing on stabilization analysis and support design, Iran. Eng Geol 108:208–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Read SAL, Richards LR, Perrin ND (1999) Applicability of the Hoek–Brown failure criterion to New Zealand greywacke rocks, vol 2. In: Proceeding 9th international society for rock mechanics congress, Paris, pp 655–660

  36. Rummel F (1986) Stresses and tectonics of the upper continental crust: a review. In: Proceedings of international symposium on rock stress and rock stress measurements, Stockholm. Centek Pubel., Lulea, pp 86–177

  37. Ramamurthy T (1986) Stability of rock mass. Indian Geotech J 16:1–74

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Singh B, Choudhari J (2007) Critical strain and squeezing of rock mass in tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 22(3):343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sheorey PR (1997) Empirical rock failure criteria. Balkema, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sefarim JL, Pereira JP (1983) Consideration of the geomechanics classification of Bieniawski. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on engineering geology underground construction, Lisbon

  41. Singh B, Viladkar MN, Samadhiya NK, Mehrota VK (1997) Rock mass strength parameters mobilized in tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 12(1):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh B, Jethwa JL, Dube AR (1992) Correlation between observed support pressure and rock mass quality. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 7(1):59–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Trueman R (1998) An evaluation of strata support techniques in dual life gateroads. PhD Thesis, University of Wales, Cardiff

  44. Unal E (1983) Design guidelines and roof control standards for coal mine roofs. PhD Thesis, Pennsylvanian State University, University Park

  45. Wiesmann E (1912) Mountain pressure. Switz J Struct 60:7 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masoud Shamsoddin Saeed.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shamsoddin Saeed, M., Maarefvand, P. Engineering Geological Study of NWCT Tunnel in Iran with Emphasis on Squeezing Problems. Indian Geotech J 44, 357–369 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0078-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0078-y

Keywords

Navigation