Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on Crack Initiation and Propagation in Rock with Pre-existing Flaw Under Uniaxial Compression

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study for crack initiation and propagation in rock with a pre-existing flaw is carried under uniaxial compression. The aim is to understand the influence of crack initiation stress and peak stress for narrow flaws in rock by conducting laboratory experiments and subsequent numerical simulations. Specimens are prepared using Gypsum material with the incorporation of flaws at varying flaw angles from 15° to 75° having three different strengths. The results of the crack initiation and peak stresses for different flaw angles along with crack growth patterns are observed. Numerical simulations using ABAQUS adopting extended finite element and cohesive zone model is attempted to capture the crack initiation and propagation in rock specimens. For closed crack condition, the numerical model considers frictional behaviour across the flaw surface and model could capture the crack initiation and peak stresses along with propagated crack patterns irrespective of the material strengths. Both laboratory and numerical studies reveal that the crack initiation stress and peak stress gets initiated sooner for the flaw having 45° when compared to all other angles which are in contrast to open flaw conditions. Also at this angle, a stable curvilinear wing cracks are observed irrespective of the material strengths. In laboratory experiments, pre-dominant wing cracks are observed for a material having high strengths that influence the final pattern in specimens while in numerical analysis, all the specimens shows clear visible wing crack propagation and leads to failure of the material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Griffith AA (1920) The phenomenon of rupture and flow in solids. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 221:163–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Inglis CE (1913) Stresses in a plate due to the presence of cracks and sharp corners. Trans Inst Nav Archit 60:219–230

    Google Scholar 

  3. Orowan E (1949) Fracture and strength of solids. Rep Progr Phys 12:185–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoek E (1964) Fracture of anisotropic rock. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 64(10):501–518

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hoek E, Bieniawski ZT (1965) Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression. J Fract Mech 1(3):139–155

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barenblatt GI (1962) The mathematical theory of equilibrium of cracks in brittle fracture. Adv Appl Mech 7:55–129

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dugdale DS (1960) Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J Mech Phys Solids 8:100–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hillerborg A, Modeer M, Petersson PE (1976) Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cem Concr Res 6:773–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Numerical modeling of fracture coalescence in a model rock material. Int J Fract 92:221–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bobet A, Einstein HH (1998) Fracture coalescence in rock-type materials under uniaxial and biaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35(7):863–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sagong M, Bobet A (2002) Coalescence of multiple flaws in a rock- model material in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39(2):229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2009) Crack coalescence in molded gypsum and Carrara marble: part 1—macroscopic observations and interpretation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 42(3):475–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong LNY, Einstein HH (2009) Systematic evaluation of cracking behavior in specimens containing single flaws under uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(2):239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park CH, Bobet A (2009) Crack coalescence in specimens with open and closed flaws: a comparison. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 46(5):819–829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Park CH, Bobet A (2010) Crack initiation, propagation and coalescence from frictional flaws in uniaxial compression. Eng Fract Mech 77(14):2727–2748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Reyes O, Einstein HH (1991) Failure mechanism of fractured rock-a fracture coalescence model. In: Proceedings of the 7th congress of the ISRM, Aachen, Germany, vol 1, pp 333–340

  17. Xu Y, Yuan H (2011) Applications of normal stress dominated cohesive zone models for mixed-mode crack simulation based on extended finite element methods. Eng Fract Mech 78:544–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonçlaves da Silva B, Einstein HH (2013) Modeling of crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in rocks. Int J Fract 182:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xie Y, Cao P, Liu J, Dong L (2016) Influence of crack surface friction on crack initiation and propagation: a numerical investigation based on extended finite element method. Comput Geotech 74:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee H, Jeon S (2011) An experimental and numerical study of fracture coalescence in pre-cracked specimens under uniaxial compression. Int J Solids Struct 48(6):979–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lisjak A, Figi D, Grasselli G (2014) Fracture development around deep underground excavations: insights from FDEM modelling. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 6:493–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahabadi OK, Lisjak A, Grasselli G, Munjiza A (2012) Y-Geo: a new combined finite-discrete element numerical code for geomechanical applications. Int J Geomech 12(6):676–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasarhelyi B, Bobet A (2000) Modeling of crack initiation, propagation and coalescence in uniaxial compression. Rock Mech Min Sci 33(2):119–139

    Google Scholar 

  24. Steif PS (1984) Crack extension under compressive loading. Eng Fract Mech 20(3):463–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Horri H, Nemat-Naseer S (1985) Compression-induced microcrack growth in brittle soilds: axial splitting and shear failure. J Geophys Res 90(B4):3105–3125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ashby MFA, Hallam SD (1986) The failure of brittle solids containing small cracks under compressive stress states. Acta Metall Sin 34(3):497–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Baud P, Reuschlé T, Charlez P (1996) An improved wing crack model for the deformation and failure of rock in compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 33(5):539–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lajtai EZ (1974) Brittle fracture in compression. Int J Fract 10(4):525–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu XP, Needleman A (1994) Numerical simulations of fast crack growth in brittle solids. J Mech Phys Solids 42:1397–1434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Camanho PP, Dávila CG (2002) Mixed-mode decohesion finite elements for the simulation of delamination in composite materials. NASA/TM-2002-211737, pp 1–42

  31. Belytschko T, Black T (1999) Elastic crack growth in finite elements with minimal remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 45:601–620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fairhurst CE, Hudson JA (1999) Draft ISRM suggested method for the complete stress–strain curve for intact rock in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(3):279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ISRM (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(2):135–140

    Google Scholar 

  34. ISRM (1978) Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Sci Geomech Abstr 15:99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ISRM (2007) The complete ISRM suggested methods for rock characterization, testing and monitoring: 1974–2006. In: Ulusay R Hudson JA (eds) Suggested methods prepared by the commission on testing methods, ISRM, compilation arranged by the ISRM Turkish National Group, Kozan Ofset, Ankara

  36. Fowell RJ (1995) Draft ISRM suggested method for determining mode I fracture toughness using cracked chevron notched barzilian disc (CCNBD) specimens. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32(1):57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Atkinson C, Smelser RE, Sanchez J (1982) Combined mode fracture via the cracked Brazilian disk test. Int J Fract 18(4):279–291

    Google Scholar 

  38. Al-Shayea NA (2005) Crack propagation trajectories for rocks under mixed mode I–II fracture. Eng Geol 81:84–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamashita T, Umeda Y (1994) Earthquake rupture complexity due to dynamic nucleation and interaction of subsidiary faults. Pure Appl Geophys 143(1–3):89–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Abaqus Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.12 (2012) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corporation. Providence, Rhode Island, USA

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Sivakumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivakumar, G., Maji, V.B. A Study on Crack Initiation and Propagation in Rock with Pre-existing Flaw Under Uniaxial Compression. Indian Geotech J 48, 626–639 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0304-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0304-8

Keywords

Navigation