Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Who are They Really? A Review of the Characteristics of Pre-service ICT Teachers in Turkey

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examines how pre-service ICT teachers who are equipped with technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge, meet challenges in their teaching practices. This study aims to portray Turkish elementary ICT teachers’ characteristics regarding their perceptions about teaching and their competencies. The data were collected by administering questionnaires to a total of 1,568 pre-service teachers. Moreover, 33 pre-service ICT teachers were interviewed, and 8 pre-service classroom observations were conducted to gain an in-depth understanding of the participants. Lesson plans were also analyzed during the data collection process. The results showed that the perceptions of the pre-service ICT teachers were generally positive about teaching. However, some negative points were also identified in their perceptions and competencies. The results of this study might shed light on who chooses ICT teaching as a profession, how ICT teachers are educated, and what career paths they follow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2003). National policies and practices on ICT in education: United States. In T. Plomp, R. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (pp. 569–580). Greenwich: Connecticut: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers & Education, 52, 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L. (2011). The practitioner’s perspective on teacher education: Preparing for the K-12 online classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 73–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arends, R. I. (2001). Learning to teach (5th ed.). NewYork: McGraw-Hill Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, A. E., Kemker, K., Harmes, C., & Kalaydjian, K. (2003). Large-scale research study on technology in K–12 schools: Technology integration as it relates to the National Technology Standards. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becta. (1998). How learning is changing: information and communications technology across Europe. Coventry: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: An exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 749–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, M., & Skamp, K. (2003). Completed first year: Novice’s perceptions of what would improve their science teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49(1), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chai, S. C. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean pre-service teachers’ ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., Koh, J. H. L. & Tan C. L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1-10, Retrieved May 19, 2013, from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40299-013-0071-3.

  • Chong, S., Wong, A. F. L., Choy, D., Wong, I. Y.-F., & Goh, K. C. (2010). Perception changes in knowledge and skills of graduating student teachers: A Singapore study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 333–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coultas, J. C., & Lewin, K. M. (2002). Who becomes a teacher? The characteristics of student teachers in four countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 22, 243–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8. Retrieved July 22, 2012, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n1.

  • Davis, N. E. (2008). How may teacher learning be promoted for educational renewal with IT? In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in education. Amsterdam: Kluwer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, N., Preston, C., & Sahin, İ. (2009). ICT teacher training: Evidence for multilevel evaluation from a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 135–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryakulu, D., & Olkun, S. (2007). Analysis of computer teachers’ online discussion forum messages about their occupational problems. Educational Technology & Society, 10(4), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EURYDICE. (2001). Basic indicators on the Incorporating of ICT into European Education Systems- facts and figures. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fajet, W., Bello, M., Leftwich, S. A., Mesler, J. L., & Shaver, A. N. (2005). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions in beginning education classes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 717–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, P., Tan, S. C., Wang, L., Wong, A., & Choy, D. (2011). Self- reflection and pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical knowledge: Promoting earlier adoption of student-centred pedagogies. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(6), 997–1013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göktaş, Y., & Topu, F. B. (2012). ICT teachers’ assigned roles and expectations from them. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 12(1), 473–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. R., Borup, J., & Smith, N. B. (2012). Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates’ technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 28(6), 530–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurcay, D., Wong, B., & Chai, C. S. (2013). Turkish and Singaporean pre-service physics teachers’ beliefs about teaching and use of technology. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 22(2), 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, M. (2004). The peculiarities of teaching information and communication technology as a subject: a study of trainee and new ICT teachers in secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(1), 29–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Education Technology Research & Develeopment, 55, 223–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinostroza, H. (2008). Technology and learning-teacher learning-service teacher training. In E. Baker & B. Mcgraw (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of education (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTE. (2009a). National educational technology standards (NETS) for teachers. Retrieved June 14, 2012, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-teachers.aspx.

  • ISTE. (2009b). NETS for coaches. Retrieved June 14, 2012, from http://www.iste.org/standards/nets-for-coaches.aspx.

  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Journal Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, D. M. (1992). Professional growth among pre-service and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62(2), 129–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J., & Kelly, M. (1985). The successful elementary teacher. Baltimore: University Press of America Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koca, S. A., & Sen, A. I. (2006). The beliefs and perceptions of pre-service teachers enrolled in a subject-area dominant teacher education program about effective Education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 946–960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulik, J. (2002). School mathematics and science programs benefit from instructional technology. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/infbrief/nsf03301/start.htm.

  • Labrana, C. M. (2007). History and social science teachers’ perceptions of their profession: A phenomenological study. The Social Studies, 98(1), 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, K. W., & Pratt, K. (2004). Information and communication technology (ICT) in secondary schools: The role of the computer coordinator. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, N., & Plomp, T. (2003). Curriculum and staff development for ICT in Education. In T. Plomp, R. Anderson, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (pp. 15–31). Greenwich: Connecticut: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leng, N. W. (2011). Reliability and validity of an information and communications technology attitude scale for teachers. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 20(1), 162–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveless, A. (2011). Technology, pedagogy and education: Reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 20(3), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowther, D., Strahl, J. D., Inan, F. A., & Ross, S. M. (2008). Does technology integration “work” when key barriers are removed? Educational Media International, 45, 195–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macnab, D. S., & Payne, F. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes and practices in mathematics teaching: Perceptions of Scottish primary school student teachers. Journal of Education for Teaching, 29(1), 55–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahijos, M., & Maxson, M. (1995). Capturing pre-service teachers’ beliefs about schooling, life and childhood. Journal of Teacher Education, 46(3), 192–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor, L. C., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Witcher, A. E., & James, T. I. (2002). Pre-service teachers’ educational beliefs and their perceptions of characteristics of effective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(2), 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2009). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and learning activity types: Curriculum-based technology integration reframed. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MoNE. (2005). Information technology teachers’ subject matter competencies. MoNE, Ankara. February 15, 2012, from http://otmg.meb.gov.tr/alanbt.html.

  • Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2004). Integrating computer technology into the classroom (3rd ed.). Columbus: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettle, E. B. (1998). Stability and change in the beliefs of student teachers during practice teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 193–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD report. (2005). National education policy review background report. Ankara. Retrieved August 10, 2012, from http://digm.meb.gov.tr/uaorgutler/OECD/OECD_onrapor_ingMart06.pdf.

  • Orhan, F., & Akkoyunlu, B. (2003). Profiles and opinions of the computer formative teachers’ on the difficulties they have faced during the applications. Hacettepe Journal of Education, 24, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, B. M., Mendelson, N., & Kron, F. W. (2003). How teachers in different educational contexts view their roles. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reigner, C. (2003). National policies and practices on ICT in education: France. In T. Plomp, N. Law, & A. Quale (Eds.), Cross-national information and communication technology policies and practices in education (pp. 233–247). Greenwich: Connecticut: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian Universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saban, A. (2003). A Turkish profile of prospective elementary school teachers and their views of teaching. Teacher and Teacher Education, 19, 829–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seferoğlu, S. S. (2004). Teacher candidates’ evaluation of their teaching competencies. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26, 131–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek, D. J., Givvin, K. B., Salmon, J. M., & MacGyvers, V. L. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs and practices related to mathematics instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, A. (2006). Perceptions of prospective entrants to teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., Ursavaş, F. Ö., & Bahçekapili, E. (2012). An assessment of pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 191–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja, N., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2013). Technological pedagogical content knowledge. A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 29(2), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications Technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(3), 235–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yildirim, S. (2007). Current utilization of ICT in Turkish basic education schools: A review of Teacher’s ICT use and barriers to integration. International Journal of Instructional Media, 34(2), 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehir-Topkaya, E., & Uztosun, M. S. (2012). Choosing teaching as a career: Motivations of pre-service English teachers in Turkey. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(1), 126–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: an ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Recep Cakir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cakir, R., Yildirim, S. Who are They Really? A Review of the Characteristics of Pre-service ICT Teachers in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 24, 67–80 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0159-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0159-9

Keywords

Navigation