Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

“Bringing Life to Learning”: A Study of Active Learning in Hospitality Education

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Active learning connects students to the real life situations they will encounter in their future jobs. In hospitality education, active learning implements various lively, fun activities to introduce practical scenarios students may experience in their hospitality careers. This study identifies 18 essential active-learning items of hospitality education through a comprehensive literature review and in-depth personal and focus group interviews with 19 hospitality educators and eight hospitality students in Asia. This paper discusses the potential benefits of using active learning, and its relationship with two major student engagement themes: “knowledge seeking” and “skills enhancement.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL methods of instruction are in use. Higher Education Research and Development, 24(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, J. N. (2012). Authentic learning and communities of practice in tourism higher education. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 12(3), 260–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APSS’s Learner-centered psychological principles. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 23–60). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J., & Clarke, K. (2007). Nurturing supportive learning environment in higher education through the teaching of study skills: To embed or not embed. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D., & Tanner, K. (2005). Infusing active learning into the large-enrollment biology class: Seven strategies, from the simple to complex. Cell Biology Education, 4, 262–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr, R. B., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning—A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, 27(6), 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barron, P. (2008). Education and talent management: Implications for the hospitality industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 20(7), 730–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. (2010). Gen Y: Who they are and how they learn. Educational Horizons, 88(2), 92–101. Winter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Eric Digest. Washington, DC: George Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Watertown, MA: Pathfinder International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carisen, B., & Glenton, C. (2011). What about N? A methodological study of sample size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(26), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. H., & Chen, C. L. (2006). Applying Problem-based learning to theoretical science course of culinary art education: An example of ingredients course. Journal of Culinary Science and Technology, 5(2/3), 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (Eds.). (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, R. (2002). Focus groups in Asia. OPCMarket researchArticlesRunning focus groups in Asia. Retrieved November 1, 2013, from http://www.orientpacific.com/focusgroups.htm.

  • Draker, A. K. (2004). Workshop on ‘Developing qualitative research method skills: Analyzing and applying your results. The Principals and Application of Qualitative Research, 63, 641–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelheim, J. R. (2010). Challenging undergraduate hospitality students: The use of debates as interactive teaching and assessment tools. ePublication@SCU, Paper Code: Stream 8 No. 873, Southern Cross University, 1–17.

  • Edelheim, J., & Ueda, D. (2007). Effective use of simulation in hospitality management education—A case study. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 6(1), 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granot, E., Brashear, T. G., & Motta, P. C. (2012). A structural guide to in-depth interviewing in business and industrial marketing research. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 27(7), 547–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. J., & Sammons, G. E. (2014). Student learning styles: Assessing active learning in the hospitality learners model. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 26(1), 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holjevac, I. A. (2003). A vision of tourism and the hotel industry in the 21st century. Hospitality Management, 22, 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. (2014). Retrieved May 22, 2014, from http://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp80.jsp?subjectID=80&tableID=191&ID=0&productType=8.

  • Huffaker, D. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2003). The new science of learning: Active learning, metacognition, and transfer of knowledge in e-learning applications. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huskin, P. R. (1995). Engagement strategies for increasing student writing success in education, 36(3), 283–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayawardena, C. C. (2001). Challenges in international hospitality management education. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(6), 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenson, K. (2007). The desire to learn: An analysis of knowledge-seeking practices among professionals. Oxford Review of Education, 33(4), 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. S. (2005). The effects of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. K., & Wood, W. B. (2005). Teaching more by lecturing less. Cell Biology Education, 4, 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus group. A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriancou, C., & Marshall, S. (1989). The nature of active learning in secondary schools’. Evaluation and Research in Education, 3(1), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • la Lopa, J. M. (2005). The benefits of teaching a course of hospitality tourism sales and service via active learning. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 17(1), 38–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Litvin, S. W., & Elangovan, T. (2000). The travel agency management game: An effective classroom teaching tool. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Education, 12(2), 57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, D., & Lynch, K. (2000). Group project work and student-centred active learning: Two different experiences. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., West, J., & Bill, K. (2008). Incorporating problem-based strategies to develop learner autonomy and employability skills in sports science undergraduate. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 7(1), 18–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthew, A. F., & Evans, R. (2012). Managing Distraction in 21st century learning environments. In R. Mortimer (Ed.), The 15th International First Year in Higher Education Conference 2012, 26–20 June 2012, Sofitel Brisbane Central, Brisbane, QLD

  • Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative research design an interactive approach (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (2006). What’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30, 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups and qualitative research (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi, H. (2002). Active learning—A cultural change needed in teacher education and schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), 763–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, M. (2004). The reconceptualisation of learner-centred approaches: A Namibian case study. International Journal of Educational Development, 24(6), 582–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orseau, L. (2013). Universal knowledge—Seeking agents. Theoretical Computer Science, 519, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researchers, 24(7), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poirier, C. R., & Feldman, R. S. (2007). Promoting active learning using individual response technology in large introductory psychology classes. Teaching of Psychology, 34(3), 194–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabiee, F. (2004). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63, 655–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, P. (2012). Understanding and teaching Generation Y. English Teaching Forum, 1, 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci, L. H., & Ferraz, C. A. (2014). Simulation models applied to practical training and skill enhancement in direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy: A review. Arq Bras Oftalmel, 77(5), 334–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richtel, M. (2010). Growing up digital, wired for distraction. The New York Times, 21, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhanen, L. (2005). Bridging the divide between theory and practice: experiential learning approaches for tourism and hospitality management education. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 5(4), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheyvens, R., Griffin, A. L., Jocoy, C. L., Liu, Y., & Bradford, M. (2008). Experimenting with active learning in geography: Dispelling the myths that perpetuate resistance. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 32(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, C., & Sutherland, K. A. (2009). Engaging tourism students through multimedia teaching and active learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 8(4), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, N. (2007). An evaluation of the effects of using case method on student learning outcomes in a tourism strategic planning course. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 7(2), 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1991). Towards more active forms of teaching and learning in hospitality studies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 10(4), 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivan, A., Leung, R. W., Woon, C. C., & Kember, D. (2000). An implementation of active learning and its effect on the quality of student learning. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods. West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walczyk, J. J., & Ramsey, L. L. (2003). Use of learner-centered instruction in college science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 566–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weltman, D., & Whiteside, M. (2010). Comparing the effectiveness of traditional and active learning methods in business statistics, Convergence to the mean. Journal of Statistics Education, 18(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetten, D. A. (2007). Principles of effective course design, What I wish I had known about learning-centered teaching 30 years ago. Journal of Management Education, 31(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, K. (2006). Active learning. Journal of Teaching in Travel and Tourism, 6(1), 77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaal, W., & Otting, H. (2010). The process of problem-based hospitality management education. Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 9(2), 17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salott Chau.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chau, S., Cheung, C. “Bringing Life to Learning”: A Study of Active Learning in Hospitality Education. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 26, 127–136 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0333-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-017-0333-6

Keywords

Navigation