Skip to main content
Log in

Additive manufacturing of flexible electrically conductive polymer composites via CNC-assisted fused layer modeling process

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The applications of electrically flexible conductive polymer composites are rapidly growing over the time due to their widespread use in fabrication of health monitoring devices, sensors, and flexible displays fabrication, etc. Various techniques have been explored to develop electrically conductive polymer composites. In the recent past, fused deposition modeling (FDM) process has been gained tremendous attention to fabricate electrically conductive parts considering rigid polymers along with conductive filler particles. This allows to avail all advantages and benefits of additive manufacturing in the fabrication of complex electrically conductive parts. However, FDM process faces challenges of filament buckling while fabricating flexible parts. Hence, there is need to develop an economically viable and simplified process to fabricate the flexible electrically conductive polymer composite objects. In the present study, fabrication of flexible electrically conductive polymer composite objects has been attempted by developing a novel CNC assisted fused layer modeling process. The developed process uses the material in pellet form instead of a filament, which eliminates the issues of filament buckling and allows flexible object fabrication. The ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) and graphite (Gr) particles have been used as the polymer matrix and conductive filler material respectively. Solvent and melt blending techniques have been employed to develop EVA/Gr composites. Three-dimensional flexible electrically conductive objects have been fabricated successfully. The experimental result shows the remarkable improvements in electrical conductivity of EVA polymer by incorporation of graphite particles. The outcome of the presented approach may help to fabricate flexible electrically conductive complex structures for soft robotics and electronics applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Qin Y, Howlader MMR, Deen MJ et al (2014) Polymer integration for packaging of implantable sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 202:758–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2014.05.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li Y, Liu Z, Wang T, Shang S (2016) High-piezoresistive sensitivity of silicone matrix composites with low metal filler content. Mater Lett 171:252–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2016.02.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Taherian R (2016) Experimental and analytical model for the electrical conductivity of polymer-based nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 123:17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2015.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alam A, Meng Q, Shi G et al (2016) Electrically conductive, mechanically robust, pH-sensitive graphene/polymer composite hydrogels. Compos Sci Technol 127:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2016.02.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao W, Nugay II, Yalcin B, Cakmak M (2016) Flexible, stretchable, transparent and electrically conductive polymer films via a hybrid electrospinning and solution casting process: in-plane anisotropic conductivity for electro-optical applications. Displays 45:48–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodridge RD, Shofner ML, Hague RJM et al (2011) Processing of a Polyamide-12/carbon nanofibre composite by laser sintering. Polym Test 30:94–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sefadi JS, Luyt AS (2012) Morphology and properties of EVA/empty fruit bunch composites. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 25:895–914. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705711421806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar N, Shaikh S, Jain PK, Tandon P (2015) Effect of fractal curve based toolpath on part strength in fused deposition modelling. Int J Rapid Manuf 5:186–198. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2015.073576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shaikh S, Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P (2016) Hilbert curve based Toolpath for FDM process. In: CAD/CAM, robot factories future. Springer, New Delhi, pp 751–759

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Taufik M, Jain PK (2016) A study of build edge profile for prediction of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. J Manuf Sci Eng 138:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taufik M, Jain PK (2013) Role of build orientation in layered manufacturing: a review. Int J Manuf Technol Manag 27:47–73. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2013.058637

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masood SH, Song WQ (2005) Thermal characteristics of a new metal/polymer material for FDM rapid prototyping process. Assem Autom 25:309–315. https://doi.org/10.1108/01445150510626451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Torrado Perez AR, Roberson DA, Wicker RB (2014) Fracture surface analysis of 3D-printed tensile specimens of novel ABS-based materials. J Fail Anal Prev 14:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-014-9803-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikzad M, Masood SH, Sbarski I (2011) Thermo-mechanical properties of a highly filled polymeric composites for fused deposition modeling. Mater Des 32:3448–3456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boparai KS, Singh R, Singh H (2016) Experimental investigations for development of Nylon6-Al-Al2O3 alternative FDM filament. Rapid Prototyp J 22:217–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-04-2014-0052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wei X, Li D, Jiang W et al (2015) 3D printable graphene composite. Sci Rep 5:11181. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rymansaib Z, Iravani P, Emslie E et al (2016) All-polystyrene 3D-printed electrochemical device with embedded carbon nanofiber-graphite-polystyrene composite conductor. Electroanalysis 28:1517–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gnanasekaran K, Heijmans T, van Bennekom S et al (2017) 3D printing of CNT- and graphene-based conductive polymer nanocomposites by fused deposition modeling. Appl Mater Today 9:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leigh SJ, Bradley RJ, Purssell CP et al (2012) A simple, low-cost conductive composite material for 3D printing of electronic sensors. PLoS One 7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049365

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kwok SW, Goh KHH, Tan ZD et al (2017) Electrically conductive filament for 3D-printed circuits and sensors. Appl Mater Today 9:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar N, Jain PK, Tandon P, Pandey PM (2018) Extrusion-based additive manufacturing process for producing flexible parts. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 40:143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1068-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Landete-Ruiz MD, Martín-Martínez JM (2005) Surface modification of EVA copolymer by UV treatment. Int J Adhes Adhes 25:139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2004.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guo C, Zhou L, Lv J (2013) Effects of expandable graphite and modified ammonium polyphosphate on the flame-retardant and mechanical properties of wood flour-polypropylene composites. Polym Polym Compos 21:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/app

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bidsorkhi HC, Adelnia H, Heidar Pour R, Soheilmoghaddam M (2015) Preparation and characterization of ethylene-vinyl acetate/halloysite nanotube nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 50:3237–3245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8891-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tavman I, Turgut A, Horny N, Chirtoc M (2013) Polymer matrix composites reinforced with expanded and unexpanded graphite Particles for electronic packaging applications. In: 2013 IEEE 19th int symp des technol electron packag SIITME 2013—Conf Proc, pp 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/siitme.2013.6743642

  26. Therriault Daniel, Hughes Vincent, Ilyass Tabiai KC (2016) 3D printable conductive nanocomposites of PLA and MWCNT. Mater Matters 11:61–65. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17004.16007

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hu W, Chen S, Yang Z et al (2011) Flexible electrically conductive nanocomposite membrane based on bacterial cellulose and polyaniline. J Phys Chem B 115:8453–8457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jain PK, Pandey PM, Rao PVM (2009) Effect of delay time on part strength in selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:117–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-008-1682-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from SERB-DST for carrying the present research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narendra Kumar.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Márcio Bacci da Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, N., Jain, P.K., Tandon, P. et al. Additive manufacturing of flexible electrically conductive polymer composites via CNC-assisted fused layer modeling process. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 40, 175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1116-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-018-1116-6

Keywords

Navigation