nach oben

Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports

Erschienen in:

16.01.2018 | Energy Markets (R Sioshansi and S Mousavian, Section Editors)

Which Flexibility Options Facilitate the Integration of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources in Electricity Systems?

verfasst von: Christoph Zöphel, Steffi Schreiber, Theresa Müller, Dominik Möst

Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Purpose of Review

In the last decade, the growing penetration of renewable energy sources has induced an increasing research interest in the analysis of flexible energy systems. In particular, the integration of intermittent renewable energy sources, as wind and photovoltaic energy, requires flexibility to compensate the imbalances between energy demand and supply. The objective of the paper is to provide a comprehensive literature review about the role of flexibility options in different electricity systems with focus on Europe and selected countries.

Recent Findings

According to the present analysis, it can be pointed out that the portfolio of flexibility options and the interdependencies between them are based on the prevalent energy system in a country or region.

Summary

The research on flexibility measures is mainly driven by the observed energy system characteristics as well as the pursued climate protection strategy. Additionally, it is not possible to cover the prospective flexibility needs with one flexibility option. Moreover, the optimal portfolio of flexibility measures depends on the type of flexibility provision required, the cost-effectiveness and whether the considered energy system is on a national or transnational level.

Vorheriger Artikel Coordination of Interdependent Electricity Grid and Natural Gas Network—a Review

Nächster Artikel Enabling Renewable Energy on both Sides of the Meter: a Focus on State-Level Approaches in New York and Texas

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

This literature review is done with focus on European energy systems since the analysis of further regions is beyond the scope of this paper. This should be done in further research.

IRENA. Renewable capacity statistics 2017. Abu Dhabi: International Renewable Energy Agency; 2017.

Alizadeh M, Parsa Moghaddam M, Amjady N, Siano P, Sheikh-El-Eslami M. Flexibility in future power systems with high renewable penetration: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;57:1186–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.200.CrossRef

• Auer H, Haas R. On integrating large shares of variable renewables into the electricity system. Energy. 2016;115:1592–601. In contrast to the other two mentioned articles focusing on technological issues of system integration, this article is of interest as another perspective is taken: The article provides insights on the conditions to integrate even larger quantities of variable RES into the electricity system by using market-based principles and how, straightforward, a sustainable electricity system could work. CrossRef

M. Barasa, D. Bogdanov, A. Oyewo and C. Breyer, A cost optimal resolution for sub-Saharan Africa powered by 100% renewables for year 2030 assumptions., in In 32nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Munich, 2016 June 20–24.

Fernandes L, Ferreira P. Renewable energy scenarios in the Portuguese electricity system. Energy. 2014;69:51–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.02.098.CrossRef

Bertsch J, Growitsch C, Lorenczik S, Nagl S. Flexibility in Europe’s power sector-an additional requirement or an automatic complement? Energy Econ. 2016;53:118–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.10.022.CrossRef

Blarke M, Lund H. The effectiveness of storage and relocation options in renewable energy systems. Renew Energy. 2008;33(7):1499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.09.001.CrossRef

Bogdanov D, Breyer C. North-East Asian Super Grid for 100% renewable energy supply: optimal mix of energy technologies for electricity, gas and heat supply options. Energy Convers Manag. 2016;112:176–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.01.019.CrossRef

C. Bussar, M. Moos, R. Alvarez, P. Wolf, T. Thien, H. Chen, Z. Cai, M. Leuthold, D. Sauer and A. Moser, Optimal allocation and capacity of energy storage systems in a future European power system with 100% renewable energy generation. Energy Procedia (Elsevier Ltd), pp. 40–47, 2014.

10.

U. Caldera and C. Breyer, Impact of battery and water storage on the transition to an integrated 100% renewable energy power system for Saudi Arabia, in 11th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, Düsseldorf, March 14–16, 2017.

11.

Dowell N, Staffel I. The role of flexible CCS in the UK's future energy system. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control. 2016;48(Part 2):327–44.CrossRef

12.

Juul N, Meibom P. Optimal configuration of an integrated power and transport system. Energy. 2011;36(5):3523–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.058.CrossRef

13.

Drysdale B, Wu J, Jenkins N. Flexible demand in the GB domestic electricity sector in 2030. Appl Energy. 2015;139:281–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.11.013.CrossRef

14.

Strbac G, Aunedi M, Pudjianto D, Djapic P, Teng F, Sturt A, et al. Strategic assessment of the role and value of energy storage systems in the UK low carbon energy future: London; 2012.

15.

• G. Strbac, M. Aunedi, D. Pudjianto, F. Teng, P. Djapic, R. Druce, A. Carmel and K. Borkowski, Value of flexibility in a decarbonised grid and system externalities of low-carbon generation technologies. NERA Economic Consulting, Imperial College London, 2015. This article aims at explicitly identifying and quantifying the system integration costs of low-carbon generation technologies in the context of the future, largely decarbonised UK electricity system. As the electricity system of UK is only weakly connected to other countries, it has to provide its balancing needs by a large share by its own, so that this country is of special interest for quantifying system integration costs.

16.

Aigner T, Jaehnert S, Doorman G, Gjengedal T. The effect of large-scale wind power on system balancing in Northern Europe. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2012;3(4):751–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2203157.CrossRef

17.

Black M, Strbac G. Value of bulk energy storage for managing wind power fluctuations. IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion. 2007;22(1):197–205. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEC.2006.889619.CrossRef

18.

Brandstätt C, Brunekreeft G, Jahnke K. How to deal with negative power price spikes? - flexible voluntary curtailment agreements for large-scale integration of wind. Energy Policy. 2011;39(6):3732–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.082.CrossRef

19.

Brouwer A, van den Broek M, Zappa W, Turkenburg W, Faaij A. Least-cost options for integrating intermittent renewables in low-carbon power systems. Appl Energy. 2016;161:48–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.090.CrossRef

20.

Lund H. Renewable energy strategies for sustainable development. Energy. 2007;32(6):912–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.10.017.CrossRef

21.

Lund H, Kempton W. Integration of renewable energy into the transport and electricity sectors through V2G. Energy Policy. 2008;36(9):3578–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.007.CrossRef

22.

Mathiesen B, Lund H, Connolly D, Wenzel H, Ostergaard P, Möller B, et al. Smart energy systems for coherent 100% renewable energy and transport solutions. Appl Energy. 2015;145:139–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.075.CrossRef

23.

Lykidi M, Gourdel P. How to manage flexible nuclear power plants in a deregulated electricity market from the point of view of social welfare? Energy. 2015;85:167–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.032.CrossRef

24.

IEA. Empowering variable renewables: options for Flexible Electricity Systems. Paris: International Energy Agency; 2009.

25.

Ma J, Silva V, Belhomme R, Kirschen DS, Ochoa LF. Evaluating and planning flexibility in sustainable power systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2013;4(1):200–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSTE.2012.2212471.CrossRef

26.

Kondziella H, Bruckner T. Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems - a review of research results and methodologies. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2016;53:10–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.199.CrossRef

27.

Kronthaler N, Müller T. Optionen zur Deckung des steigenden Flexibilitätsbedarfs. BWK. März 2016;68(3):70–3.

28.

M. Huber, D. Dimkova and T. Hamacher, Integration of wind and solar power in Europe - assessment of flexibility requirements, München, 2014.

29.

J. King, B. Kirby, M. Milligan, S. Beuning, Flexibility reserve reductions from an energy imbalance market with high levels of wind energy in the Western interconnection [Tech. rep. NREL/TP-5500-52330], National Renewable Energy Laboratory; 2011.

30.

A. V. Selasinsky, The integration of renewable energy sources in continuous intraday markets for electricity. Diss. Technical University of Dresden 2016.

31.

Buttler A, Dinkel F, Franz S, Spliethoff H. Variability of wind and solar power – an assessment of the current situation in the European Union based on the year 2014. Energy. 2016;106:147–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.041.CrossRef

32.

Klein K, Killinger S, Fischer D, Streuling C, Salom J, Cubi E. Comparison of the future residual load in fifteen countries and requirements to grid-supportive building operation. Eur Secur. October 2016;2016:11–4.

33.

Hirth L. The market value of variable renewables - the effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price. Energy Econ. 2013;38:218–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004.CrossRef

34.

Ueckerdt F, Hirth L, Luderer G, Edenhofer O. System LCOE: What are the costs of variable renewables? Energy. 2013;63:61–75.CrossRef

35.

Ueckerdt F, Brecha R, Luderer G. Analyzing major challenges of wind and solar variability in power systems. Renew Energy. 2015;81:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.002.CrossRef

36.

Klinge Jacobsen H, Zvingilaite E. Reducing the market impact of large shares of intermittent energy in Denmark. Energy Policy. 2010;38(7):3403–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.014.CrossRef

37.

Hogan M. Follow the missing money: ensuring reliability at least cost to consumers in the transition to a low-carbon power system. Electr J. 2017;30(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2016.12.006.CrossRef

38.

Rubin OD, Babcock BA. The impact of expansion of wind power capacity and pricing methods on the efficiency of deregulated electricity markets. Energy. 2013;59:676–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.07.020.CrossRef

39.

Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi), An electricity market for Germany’s energy transition, Berlin, 2015.

40.

Consentec and r. e. consulting, System Adequacy for Germany and its Neighbouring Countries: Transnational Monitoring and Assessment, 2015.

41.

T. Müller, D. Gunkel and D. Möst, Die Auswirkungen des Einspeisevorrangs erneuerbarer Energien auf die Wirtschaftlichkeit konventioneller Anlagen und die Preisdauerlinie, Köln: 10. VDI-Fachtagung Optimierung in der Energiewirtschaft, 2013.

42.

T. Müller, D. Gunkel and D. Möst, How does renewable curtailment influence the need of transmission and storage capacities in Europe?, 13th European IAEE Conference, 2013.

43.

Denholm P, Hand M. Grid flexibility and storage required to achieve very high penetration of variable renewable electricity. Energy Policy. 2011;39(3):1817–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.019.CrossRef

44.

P. Denholm, J. Novacheck, J. Jorgenson and M. O’Connell, Impact of flexibility options on grid economic carrying capacity of solar and wind: three case studies., National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), 2016.

45.

Bayer B. Current practice and thinking with integrating demand response for power system flexibility in the electricity markets in the USA and Germany. Current Sustainable / Renewable Energy Reports. 2015;2(2):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-015-0028-7.CrossRef

46.

Mechleri E, Fennell P, Dowell M. Flexible operation strategies for coal- and gas-CCS power stations under the UK and USA markets. Energy Procedia. 2017;114:6543–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1790.CrossRef

47.

Hong L, Lund H, Möller B. The importance of flexible power plant operation for Jiangsu’s wind integration. Energy. 2012;41:499–507.CrossRef

48.

D. Bogdanov, A. Toktarova and C. Breyer, Transition Towards 100% Renewable Energy system by 2050 for Kazakhstan, in Astana Economic Forum, Astana, Kazakhstan, 2017.

49.

A. Gulagi, D. Bogdanov and C. Breyer, The demand for storage technologies in energy transition pathways towards 100% renewable energy for India, in 11th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, IRES, Düsseldorf, Germany, 2017a.

50.

A. Gulagi, D. Bogdanov and C. Breyer, The demand for storage technologies in energy transition pathways towards 100% renewable energy for India., in 11th International Renewable Energy Storage Conference, March 14–16, 2017, Düsseldorf, 2017b.

51.

M. Barasa, D. Bogdanov, A. Solomon Oyewo and C. Breyer, A cost optimal resolution for sub-Saharan Africa powered by 100% renewables for year 2030 sssumptions, in 32nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Munich, Germany, 2016.

52.

53.

B. Lu, A. Blakers and M. Stocks, 90–100% renewable electricity for the South West Interconnected System of Western Australia, Energy (Accepted Manuscript), p. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.077, 2017.

54.

K. Lövebrant Västermark, M. Hofmann, E.A. Bergmann. A European energy-only market in 2030, Oslo, 2016.

55.

Holttinen H. Optimal electricity market for wind power. Energy Policy. 2005;33(16):2052–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.001.CrossRef

56.

Winkler J, Gaio A, Pfluger B, Ragwitz M. Impact of renewables on electricity markets – do supportschemes matter? Energy Policy. 2016;93:157–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.02.049.CrossRef

57.

Gawel E, Purkus A. Promoting the market and system integration of renewable energies through premium schemes—a case study of the German market premium. Energy Policy. 2013;61:599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.117.CrossRef

58.

Keay M. UK energy policy – stuck in ideological limbo? Energy Policy. 2016;94:247–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.022.CrossRef

59.

ENTSO-E, Ten-year network development plan 2016, Brussels, 2016.

60.

Schaber K, Steinke F, Mühlich P, Hamacher T. Parametric study of variable renewable energy integration in Europe: advantages and costs of transmission grid extensions. Energy Policy. 2012;42:498–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.016.CrossRef

61.

De Jonghe C, Delarue E, Belmans R, D’haeseleer W. Determining optimal electricity technology mix with high level of wind power penetration. Appl Energy. 2011;88(6):2231–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.046.CrossRef

62.

Farahmand H, Aigner T, Doorman G, Korpås M, Huertas-Hernando D. Balancing market integration in the Northern European continent: a 2030 case study. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2012;3(4):2012.CrossRef

63.

Steinke FWPHC. Grid vs. storage in a 100% renewable Europe. Renew Energy. 2013;50:826–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.044.CrossRef

64.

Bussar C, Stöcker P, Cai Z, Moraes L, Magnor D, Wiernes P, et al. Large-scale integration of renewable energies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050 - sensitivity study. J Energy Storage. 2016;6:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2016.02.004.CrossRef

65.

Fürsch M, Hagspiel S, Jägemann C, Nagl S, Lindenberger D, Tröster E. The role of grid extensions in a cost-efficient transformation of the European electricity system until 2050. Appl Energy. 2013;104:642–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.050.CrossRef

66.

Gils H, Scholz Y, Pregger T, Luca de Tena D, Heide D. Integrated modelling of variable renewable energy-based power supply in Europe. Energy. 2017;123:173–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.115.CrossRef

67.

Després J, Mima S, Kitous A, Criqui P, Hadjsaid N, Noirot I. Storage as a flexibility option in power systems with high shares of variable renewable energy sources: a POLES-based analysis. Energy Econ. 2017;64:638–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.03.006.CrossRef

68.

Mathiesen B, Lund H. Comparative analyses of seven technologies to facilitate the integration of fluctuating renewable energy sources. IET Renewable Power Generation. 2009;3(2):190. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg:20080049.CrossRef

69.

Kirkerud J, Bolkesjø T, Trømborg E. Power-to-heat as a flexibility measure for integration of renewable energy. Energy. 2017;128:776–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.153.CrossRef

70.

Kristoffersen T, Capion K, Meibom P. Optimal charging of electric drive vehicles in a market environment. Appl Energy. 2011;88(5):1940–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.015.CrossRef

71.

Schill W. Residual load, renewable surplus generation and storage requirements in Germany. Energy Policy. 2014;73:65–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.05.032.CrossRef

72.

• Weitemeyer S, Kleinhans D, Vogt T, Agert C. Integration of renewable energy sources in future power systems: the role of storage. Renewable Energy. 2015;75:14–20. The authors of this paper investigate the role of storages for the integration of renewable energy sources in future power systems and give special focus to the need of storage facilities.CrossRef

73.

Roscoe A, Ault G. Supporting high penetrations of renewable generation via implementation of real-time electricity pricing and demand response. IET Renewable Power Generation. 2010;4(4):369. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rpg.2009.0212.CrossRef

Titel: Which Flexibility Options Facilitate the Integration of Intermittent Renewable Energy Sources in Electricity Systems?
verfasst von: Christoph Zöphel
Steffi Schreiber
Theresa Müller
Dominik Möst
Publikationsdatum: 16.01.2018
Verlag: Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in: Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports / Ausgabe 1/2018
Elektronische ISSN: 2196-3010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-018-0092-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

Residential Building Energy Consumption: a Review of Energy Data Availability, Characteristics, and Energy Performance Prediction Methods

Feedback and Behavioral Intervention in Residential Energy and Resource Use: a Review

Big Data and Residential Energy Efficiency Evaluation

Cyber-Physical Resilience of Electrical Power Systems Against Malicious Attacks: a Review

Overview of State Policies for Energy Efficiency in Buildings

Correction to: Soil as a Basic Nexus Tool: Soils at the Center of the Food–Energy–Water Nexus