Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Complementary hydro-mechanical coupled finite/discrete element and microseismic modelling to predict hydraulic fracture propagation in tight shale reservoirs

  • Published:
Computational Particle Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to predict the propagation of hydraulic fractures in tight shale reservoirs. Many hydraulic fracture modelling schemes assume that the fracture direction is pre-seeded in the problem domain discretisation. This is a severe limitation as the reservoir often contains large numbers of pre-existing fractures that strongly influence the direction of the propagating fracture. To circumvent these shortcomings, a new fracture modelling treatment is proposed where the introduction of discrete fracture surfaces is based on new and dynamically updated geometrical entities rather than the topology of the underlying spatial discretisation. Hydraulic fracturing is an inherently coupled engineering problem with interactions between fluid flow and fracturing when the stress state of the reservoir rock attains a failure criterion. This work follows a staggered hydro-mechanical coupled finite/discrete element approach to capture the key interplay between fluid pressure and fracture growth. In field practice, the fracture growth is hidden from the design engineer and microseismicity is often used to infer hydraulic fracture lengths and directions. Microseismic output can also be computed from changes of the effective stress in the geomechanical model and compared against field microseismicity. A number of hydraulic fracture numerical examples are presented to illustrate the new technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Economides MJ, Martin T (2007) Modern fracturing enhancing natural gas production. Energy Tribune, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  2. King GE (2010) Thirty years of gas shale fracturing: what have we learned? In: Proceedings of the SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Florence, Italy 19–22 September, SPE 133456

  3. Cipolla CL, Lolon EP, Erdle JC, Rubin B (2010) Reservoir modelling in shale-gas reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the SPE eastern region meeting, Charleston, West Virginia, USA, 23–25 September, SPE 15530

  4. Khoei AR (2015) Extended finite element method: theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester

  5. Economides MJ, Nolte KG (2000) Reservoir stimulation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Matthews HL, Schein G, Malone M (2007) Simulation of gas shales; they’re all the same—right? In: Proceedings of the hydraulic fracturing technology conference, College Station, Texas, USA, 29–31 January, SPE 106070

  7. Mayerhofer MJ, Lolon EP, Warpinski NR, Cipolla CL, Walser D, Rightmire CM (2008) What is stimulated reservoir volume? In: Proceedings of the shale gas production conference, Fort Worth, Texas, USA, 16–18 November, SPE 119890

  8. Jones J, Britt JZ (2005) Design and appraisal of hydraulic fractures. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson

  9. Yew CH, Weng X (2015) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Gulf Professional Publishing, Waltham

    Google Scholar 

  10. Belytschko T, Liu WK, Moran B (2000) Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu SR, Giu L (2012) Introduction to the explicit finite element method for nonlinear transient dynamics. Wiley, Hoboken

  12. Alqahtani NB, Miskimins JL (2010) 3D finite element modeling of laboratory hydraulic fracture experiments. In: Proceedings of the annual conference, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June, SPE 130556

  13. Nassir M, Settari A, Wan H (2012) Prediction and optimization of fracturing in tight gas and shale using a coupled geomechanical model of combined tensile and shear fracturing. In: Hydraulic fracture technology conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 6–8 February, SPE 152200

  14. Cipolla CL, Warpinski NR, Mayerhofer MJ, Lolon EP, Vincent MC (2010) The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties and fracture-treatment design. In: Annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, USA, 21–24 September, SPE 115769

  15. Weng X, Kresse O, Cohen C, Wu R, Gu H (2011) Modeling of hydraulic-fracture-network propagation in a naturally fractured formation. In: Hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 24–26 January, SPE 140253

  16. Kresse O, Cohen C, Weng X, Wu R, Gu H (2011) Numerical modeling of hydraulic fracturing in naturally fractured formations. In: 45th US rock mechanic/geomechanics symposium, San Francisco, CA, 26–29 June

  17. McClure MC (2012) Modeling and characterization of hydraulic stimulation and induced seismicity in geothermal and shale gas reservoirs. PhD Thesis, Stanford University

  18. Munjiza A (2004) Combined finite-discrete element method. Wiley, Chichester

  19. Gordeliy E, Peirce A (2013) Coupling schemes for modelling hydraulic fracture propagation using the XFEM. Comput Method Appl Mech Eng 253:305–322

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lisjak A, Liu Q, Zhao Q, Mahabadi OK, Grasselli G (2013) Numerical simulation of acoustic emission in brittle rocks by two-dimensional finite-discrete element analysis. Geophys J Int 195:423–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kolditz O, Delfs J-O, Burger C, Beinhorn M, Park C-H (2008) Numerical analysis of coupled hydrosystems based on an objected compartment approach. J Hydroinform 10:227–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kolditz O, Gorke U-J, Shao H, Wang W (2012) Thermo–hydro-mechanical–chemical processes in fractured porous media. Springer

  23. Wang W, Kolditz O (2004) Object-oriented finite element analysis of thermos-hydro-mechanical (THM) problems in porous media. Int J Numer Eng 69:162–201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. ELFEN TGR manual (2014) Rockfield Software Ltd

  25. Kim J (2010) Sequential methods for coupled geomechanics and multiphase. PhD Thesis, Stanford University

  26. Bai M, Elsworth D (2000) Coupled processes in subsurface deformation, flow, and transport. ASCE Press, Reston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Diersch HJ (2013) FEFLOW: finite element modeling of flow, mass and heat transport in porous and fractured media. Springer, Berlin

  28. Lobao MC (2007) Finite element modelling of hydraulic fracture flow in porous media. PhD Thesis, Swansea University

  29. Valko P, Economides MJ (1995) Hydraulic fracture mechanics. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lewis RW, Schrefler JZ (1998) The finite element method in the static and dynamic deformation and consolidation of porous media. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Klerck PA (2000) The finite element modelling of discrete fracture in quasi-brittle materials. PhD Thesis, Swansea University

  32. Bazant PZ, Planas J (1997) Fracture size effect in concrete and other quasi-brittle materials. CRC Press

  33. Crook AJL, Willson SM, Yu JG, Owen DRJ (2006) Predictive modelling of structure evolution in sandbox experiments. J Struct Geol 28:729–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Crook T, Willson S, Yu JG, Owen R (2003) Computational modelling of the localized deformation associated with borehole breakout in quasi-brittle materials. J Pet Sci Eng 38:177–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bai M (2011) Improved understanding of fracturing tight-shale gas formations. In: Proceedings of the production and operation symposium, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 27–29 March, SPE 140968

  36. Williams BB (1970) Fluid loss from hydraulically induced fractures. J Pet Technol 22:882–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ (2005) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang M, Yue ZQ, Tham LG, Zienkiewicz OC (2004) On the stable finite element procedures for dynamic problems of saturated porous media. Int J Numer Methods Eng 61:1421–1450

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Minkoff SE, Stone CM, Bryant S, Peszynska M, Wheeler MF (2003) Coupled fluid flow and geomechanical deformation modeling. J Pet Sci Eng 38:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang M, Wu S, Zienkiewicz OC (2001) Incompressible or nearly incompressible soil dynamic behaviour—a new staggered algorithm to circumvent restrictions of mixed formulation. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 21:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Barree RD, Gilbert JV (2009) Stress and rock property profiling for unconventional reservoir stimulation. In: Proceedings of the hydraulic fracturing technology conference, The Woodlands, Texas, USA, 19–21 January, SPE 118703

  42. Olovsson L, Simonsson K, Unosson M (2005) Selective mass scaling for explicit finite element analyses. Int J Numer Methods Eng 63:1436–1445

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Davies RJ, Mathias S, Moss J, Hustoft S, Newport L (2012) Hydraulic fractures: how far can they go? Mar Pet Geol 37:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peric D, Hochard CH, Dutko M, Owen DRJ (1996) Transfer operators for evolving meshes in small strain elasto-plasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 137:331–344

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Angus DA, Kendall JM, Fisher QJ, Segura JM, Skachkov S, Crook AJL, Dutko M (2010) Modelling microseismicity if a producing reservoir from coupled fluid-flow and geomechanical simulation. Geophys Prospect 58:901–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hazzard J, Young R (2002) Moment tensors and micromechanical models. Tectonophysics 356:181–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Angus DA, Dutko M, Kristiansen TG, Fisher QJ, Kendall J-M, Baird AF, Verdon JP, Barkved OI, Yu J, Zhao S (2015) Integrated hydro-mechanical and seismic modelling of the Valhall reservoir: a case study of predicting subsidence, AVOA and microseismicity. Geomech Energy Environ 2:32–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wriggers P (2006) Computational contact mechanics. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhong ZH (1993) Finite element procedures for contact-impact problems. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  50. Soliman MY, Augustine J (2010) Fracturing design aimed at enhancing fracture complexity. In: Proceedings of the annual conference, Barcelona, Spain, 14–17 June, SPE 130043

  51. Medeiros F, Ozkan E, Kazemi H (2008) Productivity and drainage area of fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoirs. In: Proceedings of the Rocky Mountain oil and gas technology symposium, Denver, Colorado, USA, 16–18 April, SPE 108110

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rockfield Software Limited, Swansea, SA1 8AS, UK

    Matthew Profit, Martin Dutko, Jianguo Yu & Sarah Cole

  2. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Doug Angus

  3. University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

    Alan Baird

Authors
  1. Matthew Profit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Dutko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianguo Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sarah Cole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Doug Angus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alan Baird
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Profit.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Profit, M., Dutko, M., Yu, J. et al. Complementary hydro-mechanical coupled finite/discrete element and microseismic modelling to predict hydraulic fracture propagation in tight shale reservoirs. Comp. Part. Mech. 3, 229–248 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0081-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40571-015-0081-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation