Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Green Economy, Green Capitalism and the Imperial Mode of Living: Limits to a Prominent Strategy, Contours of a Possible New Capitalist Formation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since some years, the strategy of a Green Economy as a current form of ecological modernization was proposed. The paper highlights the core issues of the concept and its structural constraints. Several constraints of a far-reaching realization of a Green Economy are presented, and one constraint is highlighted, i.e., the imperial mode of (production and) living. The latter gives emphasis to the continuous and largely unquestioned access to products produced by cheap labor and under environmentally problematic conditions. This mode of living, the paper argues, is also attractive among the upper and middle classed in countries with emerging economies like China. Moreover, it compares it with the concept of sustainable development which emerged some 15 years ago. Like sustainable development, proposals for a Green Economy might become “a tranquilizing dispositive” in order to silence doubt and criticisms. However, it is argued that, despite the improbability of realizing the ambitious objectives, the Green Economy strategy might contribute to further capitalist development. Environmental issues might be integrated into the mode of production and living. However, given capitalist and imperial structures and dynamics, this will occur in highly selective and partial ways. The author calls this emerging constellation and possible new mode of development in some countries or regions of the world Green Capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I do not deny the fact that geopolitical rivalry might lead in some cases to technological innovation. But the overall trend goes into another direction.

  2. Camila Moreno from Brazil insisted in our talks and discussions in China that a greening of capitalism is on the top of the agenda of powerful economic and political actors and that it already takes place (cf. Moreno 2013).

References

  • Aglietta, Michel. 1979. A theory of capitalist regulation. The US-Experience. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Robert. 1990. The regulation school: A critical introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich. 2012. Green economy and green capitalism: Some theoretical considerations. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 28(3): 118–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2012. Global environmental politics and the imperial mode of living. Globalizations 9(4): 547–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2013. Crisis and continuity of capitalist society–nature relationships. The imperial mode of living and the limits to environmental governance. Review of International Political Economy 20(4): 687–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2014. Financialisation of Nature as Crisis Strategy. Journal für Entwicklungspolitik 30(2): 16–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich, and Markus Wissen. 2015. Social-Ecological Transformation. In International encyclopedia of geography. People, the earth, environment, and technology, ed. Noel Castree, Michael Goodchild, Weidong Liu, Audrey Kobayashi, Richard Marston, and Douglas Richardson. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell/Association of American Geographers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchardt, Hans-Jürgen, and Kristina Dietz. 2014. (Neo-)Extractivism—A new challenge for development theory from Latin America. Third World Quarterly 35(3): 468–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, Melinda. 2010. Turbulent worlds. Financial markets and environmental crisis. Theory, Culture & Society 27(2–3): 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, Terry. 2012. Why Marx was right. Yale: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010. EUROPE 2020. A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. COM(2010) 2020 final. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52010DC2020&from=EN. Accessed 25 May 2015.

  • European Commission. 2011. World and European energy and environment transition outlook. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/publication-weto-t_en.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.

  • Fairbairn, Madeleine. 2014. “Like gold with yield”: Evolving intersections between farmland and finance. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41(5): 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, John. 2015. China: Ecological civilization rising? Huffington Post, February.

  • Hirsch, Joachim. 1997. Globalization of capital, nation-states and democracy. Studies in Political Economy 54: 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huan, Qingzhi. 2008. Growth economy and its ecological impacts upon China. International Journal of Inclusive Democracy 4: 1–12.

  • Huber, Joseph. 2011. Ökologische Modernisierung und Umweltinnovation. In Handbuch Umweltsoziologie, ed. Matthias Groß, 279–302. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hudis, Peter. 2012. Marx’s concept of the alternative to capitalism. Leiden and Boston: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Carlo C., Leonidas Paroussos, Diana Mangalagiu, Roland Kupers, Antoine Mandel, and Joan David Tàbara. 2011. A New Growth Path for Europe. Generating prosperity and jobs in the Low-Carbon Economy. Synthesis report. A study commissioned by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. European Climate Forum: Potsdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lander, Edgardo. 2011. El lobo se viste con piel de cordero. America Latina en movimiento 468–469: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mol, Arthur, David Sonnenfeld, and Gert Spaargaren (eds.). 2009. The ecological modernisation reader. Environmental reform in theory and practice. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, Camila. 2013. Las ropas verdes del rey. La economía verde: una nueva fuente de acumulación primitiva. In Alternativas al Capitalismo/Colonialismo del Siglo XXI, eds. Miriam Lang et al., 63–97. Quito: Abya Yala and Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.

  • Oberndorfer, Lukas. 2014. A new economic governance through secondary legislation? analysis and constitutional assessment. In The economic and financial crisis and collective Labour Law in Europe, ed. Niklas Bruun, Klaus Lörcher, and Isabelle Schömann. Oxford: Hart-Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2009. Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation. Synthesis report framework, practices and measurement. http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/43423689.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.

  • OECD. 2011. Towards green growth. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, Wolfgang. 1999. Planet dialectics. Explorations in environment and development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, Arieal. 2012. Rio+20 and the extractivist green economy. Arena 119: 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbeck, Sune, and Etienne Schneider. 2013. From the Sovereign Debt Crisis to Authoritarian Statism. Contradictions of the European State Project. New Political Economy 19(6): 847–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spash, Clive L. 2012. Green economy, Red Herring. Environmental Values 21(2): 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thie, Hans. 2013. Rotes Grün. Pioniere und Prinzipien einer ökologischen Gesellschaft. Hamburg: VSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Secretary-General. 2010. Progress to date and remaining gaps in the implementation of the outcomes of the major summits in the area of sustainable development, as well as an analysis of the themes of the conference. Report for the Preparatory Committee for the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

  • UNEP. 2011a. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. http://www.unep.org/greeneconomy/Portals/88/documents/ger/ger_final_dec_2011/Green%20EconomyReport_Final_Dec2011.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.

  • UNEP. 2011b. Decoupling natural resource use and environmental impacts from economic growth. A report of the working group on decoupling to the international resource panel. http://www.unep.org/resourcepanel/decoupling/files/pdf/Decoupling_Report_English.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.

  • Veltmeyer, Henry. 2013. The political economy of natural resource extraction: A new model or extractive imperialism? Canadian Journal of Development Studies 34(1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zhihe, Huili He and Meijun Fan. 2014. The ecological civilization debate in China. Monthly Review. http://monthlyreview.org/2014/11/01/the-ecological-civilization-debate-in-china/. Accessed May 25 2015.

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Beijing office of Rosa Luxemburg Foundation and here especially Lutz Pohle and Sun Wei, my hosts at the mentioned universities as well as Prof. Huan Qingzhi from Peking University who invited me to China and introduced me many of his most interesting colleagues. Camila Moreno from Brazil commented critically and complemented my talks by referring to recent dynamics in Latin America, its connections with China and the manifold alternative experiences, especially those who go beyond the orientation at “development” and the long and still existing colonial history. Last but not least, many thanks go to Etienne Schneider for research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrich Brand.

Additional information

This article is based on lectures I held at Peking University, Zhongnan University (Wuhan) and Fudan University (Shanghai) in April 2015.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brand, U. Green Economy, Green Capitalism and the Imperial Mode of Living: Limits to a Prominent Strategy, Contours of a Possible New Capitalist Formation. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 9, 107–121 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0095-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-015-0095-6

Keywords

Navigation