Abstract
In this paper a novel approach for effective utilization of river assimilative capacity has been proposed. The method, referred to as waste load scheduling (WLS) is based on the principle that by restricting the effluent discharge into the river to only one polluter at any given day will allow us to utilize the available river assimilative capacity in a more efficient manner. This is achieved by scheduling the dischargeable waste load among the polluters, such that a waste load schedule once developed will specify two things: (1) which polluter has to discharge his/her effluent on a given day; and (2) what is the quantity of effluent that he/she can discharge. By scheduling the waste load discharge into the river thus, will considerably reduce the total effluent discharge into the river and hence a greater degree of water quality level can be achieved when compared to traditional waste load allocation methods. For the mathematical development of the model, the WLS problem was envisaged as analogous to a machine scheduling problem. In a simple single MS problem n number of jobs are required to be scheduled on a single machine to minimize/maximize a pre-defined performance measure. In a WLS problem, the river can be treated as a machine and the polluters discharging effluent directly into the river are analogous to the jobs to be scheduled. Treating the waste load scheduling problem in an analogous way to a MS problem enables us to apply the solution methods used for solving standard sequencing and scheduling problems to the proposed waste load scheduling problem. Although the present paper discusses the special case of waste load scheduling in which only one polluter can discharge effluent at any given day (suitable when the number of point load sources is small), it is however, possible to extend it to a more general case involving a large number of polluters as easily. In the accompanying paper, the application of the developed model to a case study has been explained in detail. The proposed model and its application proved that the model is highly efficient in solving the waste load allocation problem in a more comprehensive way.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker KR, Trietsch D (2008) Principles of sequencing and scheduling. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey
Boner MC, Furland LP (1982) Seasonal treatment and variable effluent quality based on assimilative capacity. Water Pollut Control Fed 54(10):1408–1416
Boyd J (2003) Water pollution charges: a good idea doomed to failure? Public Finance and Management 1
Chaves P, Kojiri T, Yamashiki Y (2003) Optimization of storage reservoir considering water quantity and quality. Hydrol Process 17:2769–2793
Dai T, Labadie JW (2001) River basin network model for integrated water quantity/quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127:295–305
Dhar A, Datta B (2008) Optimal operation of reservoirs for downstream water quality control using linked simulation optimization. Hydrol Process 22:842–853
Graves GW, Hatfield GB, Whinston A (1969) Water pollution control using bypass piping. Water Resour Res 5(1):13–47
Hunter JV, Whipple Jr W (1970) Artificial instream aeration for polluted rivers. Water Pollu Control Fed 42(8):249–262
Ikebuchi, S, Takasao T, Kojiri T (1982) Real-time operation of reservoir systems including flood, low flow and turbidity controls. Experience in Operation of Hydro-systems Sunny TE, McBean EA (eds), Water Resources Publications: Littleton, CO; 25–46
Jaworski NA, Weber Jr WJ, Deininger RA (1970) Optimal reservoir releases for water quality control. J Sanit Eng Div 96(3):727–742
Kneese AV, Bower BT (1984) Managing water quality: economics, technology, institutions. Resource from the Future, John Hopkins
Loucks DP (1976) Surface water quality management models. In: Biswas AK (ed) Systems approach to water management. McGraw-Hill, New York
Loucks DP, Jacoby HD (1972) Flow regulation for water quality management. In: Jacoby HD, Thomas HA (eds) Models for managing regional water quality dorfman R. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 362–431
Ng AWM, Perera BJC, Tran DH (2006) Improvement of river water quality through a seasonal effluent discharge program. Water Air Soil Pollut 176(1–4):113–137
Olgac NM, Longman RW, Cooper CA (1976) Optimal control of artificial aeration in river networks. ISA Trans 15(4):359–371
Rinaldi SR, Soncini-Sessa SH, Tamura H (1979) Modeling and control of river quality. McGraw Hill Publications
Rossman LA (1989) Risk equivalent seasonal waste load allocation. Water Resour Res 25(10):2083–2090
Simonovic S, Orlob GT (1984) Risk-reliability programming for optimal water quality control. Water Resour Res 20:639–646
Streeter HW, Phelps EB (1925) A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio river. Public Health Bulletin 146
Symons JM, Weibel SR, Robeck GG (1965) Impoundment influences on water quality. Am Water Works Assoc 57(1):51–75
Takyi AK, Lence BJ (1995) Markov chain model for seasonal-water quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 121(2):144–157
Thomann RV, Muller JA (1987) Principles of surface water quality modeling and control. Harper and Row New York
Velz CJ (1970) Applied stream sanitation. Wiley Interscience
Willey RG, Smith DJ, Duke Jr JH (1996) Modeling water-resources systems for water quality management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 122:171–179
Yeh WW-G (1985) Reservoir management and operation models: a state of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21:1797–1818
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohan, S., Pavan Kumar, K. Waste Load allocation Using Machine Scheduling: Model Formulation. Environ. Process. 3, 125–137 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0121-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-016-0121-y