Abstract
In view of the incompatibility of various indicators in water quality evaluation, as well as the uncertainty and fuzziness of water quality grade, this paper introduces the Bayesian theory and fuzzy number theory, and proposes a generalized triangular fuzzy number based comprehensive water quality evaluation model to evaluate the water quality in Wuhan section of Yangtze River. On this basis, a water quality evaluation system is established from the six dimensions of TP, NH4+-N, COD, DO, As and fecal coliform group. Then, the weight of water quality evaluation index is comprehensively determined by the variation coefficient method. Finally, the water quality category was determined according to the posterior probability corresponding to each class at the monitoring point. Through experiments, the evaluation results of the proposed model are compared with the single-parameter model, comprehensive evaluation method model, grey correlation analysis model and multivariate statistical analysis model. The results show that the water quality evaluation model based on the generalized triangle fuzzy number is more scientific and accurate, and the evaluation results are consistent with the actual water quality in the study area. Compared with the other four classical evaluation models, the proposed method has higher accuracy in water quality evaluation, and better application value in water quality evaluation system.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Ban X, Yu C, Pan B, Ren X, Du Y, Zhang L (2014) Application of the CWQII method and a 2D water quality model to assess diversion schemes for East Lake (Donghu), Wuhan, China. Lake Reserv Manag 30(4):358–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2014.942044
Busico G, Ntona MM, Carvalho SC, Patrikaki O, Voudouris K, Kazakis N (2021) Simulating future groundwater recharge in coastal and inland catchments. Water Resour Manag 35:3617–3632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-021-02907-2
Cakir R, Raimonet M, Sauvage S, Paredes-Arquiola J, Grusson Y, Roset L, Meaurio M, Navarro E, Sevilla-Callejo M, Lechuga-Crespo JL, Pascual JJG, Bodoque JM, Sánchez-Pérez JM (2020) Hydrological alteration index as an indicator of the calibration complexity of water quantity and quality modeling in the context of global change. Water 12(1):115. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010115
Duan K, Wang XL, Liu BJ, Zhao TTG, Chen XH (2021) Comparing Bayesian model averaging and reliability ensemble averaging in post-processing runoff projections under climate change. Water 13(15):2124. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13152124
Efendi R, Imandari AN, Rahmadhani Y, Suhartono SNA, Arbai N, Deris MM (2021) Fuzzy autoregressive time series model based on symmetry triangular fuzzy numbers. New Math Nat Comput 17(2):387–401. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005721500204
Feng DC, Chen SZ, Azadi Kakavand MR, Taciroglu E (2021) Probabilistic model based on Bayesian model averaging for predicting the plastic hinge lengths of reinforced concrete columns. J Eng Mech 147(10). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0001976
Fernandes A, Chaves H, Lima R, Neves J, Vicente H (2020) Draw on artificial neural networks to assess and predict water quality. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 612:012–028
Haakonsson S, Rodríguez MA, Carballo C, del Carmen PM, Arocena R, Bonilla S (2020) Predicting cyanobacterial biovolume from water temperature and conductivity using a Bayesian compound Poisson-gamma model. Water Res 176:115710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115710
Huang JC, Qian R, Gao JF, Bing HJ, Huang Q, Qi LY, Song S, Huang JF (2021) A novel framework to predict water turbidity using Bayesian modeling. Water Res 202:117406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117406
Kazakis N, Mattas C, Pavlou A, Patrikaki O, Voudouris K (2017) Multivariate statistical analysis for the assessment of groundwater quality under different hydrogeological regimes. Environ Earth Sci 76:349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6665-y
Khan MYA, Gani KM, Chakrapani GJ (2016) Assessment of surface water quality and its spatial variation. A case study of Ramganga River, Ganga Basin, India. Arab J Geosci 9:28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2134-7
Liu Y, Yang PJ, Hu C, Guo HC (2008) Water quality modeling for load reduction under uncertainty: a Bayesian approach. Water Res 42(13):3305–3314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.007
Liu ZY, Cheng LY, Lin KR, Cai HY (2021) A hybrid Bayesian vine model for water level prediction. Environ Model Softw 142:105075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105075
Mohammad MN, Gianbattista B, Alex E, Jim WH, Paul GW (2019) Assessment of risks to public water supply from low flows and harmful water quality in a changing climate. Water Resour Res 55(12):10386–10404. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR022865
Onema JK, Taigbenu AE (2011) Sensitivity analyses of landscape attributes on flow prediction in data-poor Semliki watershed. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 36(14–15):814–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2011.07.082
Peng ZL, Hu YM, Liu G, Hu WP, Zhang H, Gao R (2020) Calibration and quantifying uncertainty of daily water quality forecasts for large lakes with a Bayesian joint probability modelling approach. Water Res 185:116162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116162
Shrestha A, Ghimire B, Gonzalez-Longatt F (2021) A Bayesian model to forecast the time series kinetic energy data for a power system. Energies 14(11):3299. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14113299
Wang J, Forman BA, Davis AP (2018) Probabilistic storm water runoff and water quality modeling of a highway in suburban Maryland. J Hydrol Eng 23(2):05017034. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001600
Wang F, Wang YX, Zhang K, Hu M, Weng Q, Zhang HC (2021) Spatial heterogeneity modeling of water quality based on random forest regression and model interpretation. Environ Res 202:111660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.111660
Wu J, Liu ZH (2020) Research on social benefit evaluation of Dujiangyan water conservancy project. Proceedings of the 17th international conference on innovation and management 542-548, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, 2020-12-05. https://doi.org/10.26914/c.cnkihy.2020.062193
Xue BL, Zhang HW, Wang YT, Tan ZX, Zhu Y, Shrestha S (2021) Modeling water quantity and quality for a typical agricultural plain basin of northern China by a coupled model. Sci Total Environ 790:148139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148139
Yin X, Jiang BL, Feng ZX, Yao BK, Shi XQ, Sun YY, Wu JC (2017) Comprehensive evaluation of shallow groundwater quality in central and southern Jiangsu Province, China. Environ Earth Sci 76:400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6733-3
Yu RL, Zhang C (2021) Early warning of water quality degradation: a copula-based Bayesian network model for highly efficient water quality risk assessment. J Environ Manag 292:112749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112749
Zhong M, Zeng T, Jiang T, Wu H, Chen XH, Hong Y (2021) A copula-based multivariate probability analysis for flash flood risk under the compound effect of soil moisture and rainfall. Water Resour Manag 35:83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-020-02709-y
Zou ZH, Yun Y, Sun JG (2006) Entropy method for determination of weight of evaluating indicators in fuzzy synthetic evaluation for water quality assessment. J Environ Sci 18(5):1020–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60032-6
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Miao Tang and Hui Zeng: Designed and performed the experiments, analyzed the data and prepared the paper; Miao Tang and Kang Wang: Participated to collect the materials related to the experiment.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, M., Zeng, H. & Wang, K. Bayesian Water Quality Evaluation Model Based on Generalized Triangular Fuzzy Number and its Application. Environ. Process. 9, 6 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-022-00562-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-022-00562-2