Skip to main content
Log in

Visible Light Refraction Effects on High-Speed Stereo Digital Image Correlation Measurement of a Thin Panel in Mach 2 Flow

  • S.I. : Computer Vision and Scanning Laser Vibrometry Methods
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study utilized a Mach 2 wind tunnel, Research Cell 19 (RC-19), where the panel specimen became part of the test section top wall. Two stereo digital image correlation (3D-DIC) systems simultaneously acquired displacement measurements both with and without flow by filming the front and back sides of the panel. The two DIC results were then compared to note if any changes between the two measurements could be attributed to light refraction distortions. Various flow conditions were investigated including varying stagnation pressures and multiple shock angles to characterize and quantify potential distortions over a range of conditions. Previous work showed that the distortions were largely quasi-static in nature which had little or no bearing on vibration measurement however, static deflections caused by thermal gradients and less than ideal boundary conditions could be important for finite element model updating. Current results indicate that distortions at the shock wave foot were present in the DIC displacement results however, the level of distortion could be considered the same magnitude of typical sources of measurement noise and not significant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daub D, Willems S, Gulhan A (2016) Experimental results on unsteady shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction induced by an impinging shock. CEAS Space J 8:3–12

  2. Currao GMD, Neely AJ, Kennell CM, Gai SL, Buttsworth DR (2019) Hypersonic Fluid-Structure Interaction on a Cantilevered Plate with Shock Impingement. AIAA J 57(11):4819–4834

  3. Casper KM, Beresh SJ, Henfling JF, Spillers RW, Hunter P, Spitzer S (2019) Hypersonic Fluid–Structure Interactions Due to Intermittent Turbulent Spots on a Slender Cone. AIAA J 57(2):749–759

  4. Riley ZB, Perez R, Ehrhardt D, Hagen B (2019) Optical Measurements of the Aerothermoelastic Response of a Thin Panel at Mach 6, 66th JANNAF. Dayton, Ohio

  5. Peltier S, Rice B, Szmodis JM, Ogg D, Hofferth JW, Sellers ME, Harris A (2019) Aerodynamic Response to a Compliant Panel in Mach 4 Flow. AIAA Aviation Forum, Dallas

  6. Beberniss T, Spottswood S, Eason T (2011) High–Speed Digital Image Correlation Measurements of Random Nonlinear Dynamic Response. SEM Annual Conference, Uncasville

  7. Spottswood S, Eason T, Beberniss T (2012) Influence of Shock–Boundary Layer Interactions on the Dynamic Response of a Flexible Panel. ISMA Biennial Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven Belgium

  8. Beberniss T, Spottswood S, Ehrhardt D, Perez R (2017) Nonlinear Response of a Thin Panel Subjected to a Shock Wave Impingement. SEM IMAC XXXV, Orlando

  9. Sutton MA, Orteu JJ, Schreier HW (2009) Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements. Springer, New York

  10. Avitabile P, Niezrecki C, Helfrick M, Warren C, Pingle P (2010) Noncontact Measurement Techniques for Model Correlation. J Sound Vibr 326:8–12

  11. Warren C, Niezrecki C, Avitabile P, Pingle P (2011) Comparison of FRF measurements and mode shapes determined using optically image based, laser, and accelerometer measurements. Mech Syst Signal Process 25:2191–2202

  12. Beberniss T, Ehrhardt D (2017) High–Speed 3D digital image correlation measurements of long–duration random vibration: recent advancements and noted limitations. Mech Syst Signal Process 86:35–48

  13. Owens J (1967) Optical refractive index of air: dependence on pressure, temperature, and composition. Appl Opt 6(1):51– 59

  14. Setchell R (1979) Index of refraction of shock–compressed fused silica and sapphire. Appl Phys 50(12):8186–8192

  15. Pan B, Wu D, Yu L (2012) Optimization of a three–dimensional digital image correlation system for deformation measurements in extreme environments. Appl Opt 51(19):4409– 4419

  16. Berke RB, Lambros J (2014) Ultraviolet digital image correlation (UV–DIC) for high temperature applications. Rev Sci Instrum 85:1–9

  17. Beberniss T, Ehrhardt D (2017) Dynamic Response of a Thin Panel Subjected to a Shock Wave Impingement and Thermal Buckling. AIAA Aviation, Denver

  18. Gonzalez RC, Woods R. E. (2008) Digital Image Processing. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

  19. Allemang R (2008) Modal Vector Normalization, System Dynamic Analysis class notes. University of Cincinnati, OH

  20. Ogg D, Rice B, Peltier S, Staines J, Claucherty S, Combs C (2018) Simultaneous Stereo Digital Image Correlation and Pressure–Sensitive Paint Measurements in a Mach 2 Wind Tunnel. AIAA Aviation Forum, Atlanta

  21. Raffel M (2015) Background–oriented Schlieren Techniques. Exper Fluids 56(60):1–17

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy J. Beberniss.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beberniss, T.J., Ehrhardt, D.A. Visible Light Refraction Effects on High-Speed Stereo Digital Image Correlation Measurement of a Thin Panel in Mach 2 Flow. Exp Tech 45, 241–255 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00408-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-020-00408-2

Keywords

Navigation