Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geoinformatics based landslide vulnerable zonation mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a study of Kallar river sub watershed, Kallar watershed, Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landslide is one of the most horrible catastrophic events among the various disasters to the human society, which is caused by the influence of various phenomena of the earth, atmospheric and anthropogenic activities individually or collectively. Landslides not only affect the loss of human life, but also cause economic burden on the society. In the very recent past Geoinformatics based decision support system and techniques are being used for landslide hazard mapping and zonation maping. It enables the combination of different data layers at varies levels. In the present study, Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was applied to prepare landslide Vulnerable Zonation mapping for Kallar River Sub Watersheds, Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu by taking ten relevant factors. All these factors were converted into layers by extraction of related spatial data. The Landslide Vulnerable Zonation Index was calculated using the weighted linear combination technique based on the assigned weight and the rating given by using AHP method. Finally the study area was brought under five classes of vulnerable zones. In this 33% of area occupied by very high and high zones followed by moderate zone covers 41 and 26% of the area under very low vulnerability and low vulnerability zones. Further resulted vulnerable zone map and land use/land cover map were overlaid to check the vulnerability status by comparing the previous significant landslide locations. The landslide Vulnerable Zonation map is useful for landslide hazard prevention, mitigation, and improvement to society and implementation of appropriate landuse planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althuwaynee OF, Pradhan B, Lee S (2012) Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Comput Geosci 44:120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson PM, Massari R (1998) Generalized linear modeling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy. Comput Geosci 24:373–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnel R (1998) Principles of geographical information systems. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, London, p 193

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Detti R, Guzzetti F, Pasqui V, Reichenbach P (1991) GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surf Process Landf 16(5):427-445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrara A, Cardinali M, Guzzetti F (1992) Uncertainty in assessing landslide hazard and risk. ITC J (2):172–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandel VBS, Brar KK, Chauhan Y (2011) RS & GIS based landslide hazard zonation of mountainous terrains: a study from Middle Himalayan Kullu District, Himachal Pradesh, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 2(1):121–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson JN, Chandler MP (1991) A preliminary landslide hazard zonation of the under cliff of the Isle of Wight. In: Chandler RJ (ed) Slope stability engineering, development and applications. Prococeedings of the international conference on slope stability, Isle of Wight, 15–18 April, Thomas Telford, pp 197-206

  • Jibson RW, Harp EL, Michael JA (2000) A method for producing digital probabilistic seismic landslide hazard maps. Eng Geol 58(3–4):271–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S (2007) Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environ Geol 52(4):615–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2006) Probabilistic landslide hazards and risk mapping on Penang Island, Malaysia. J Earth Syst Sci 115(6):661–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee EM, Doorkamp JC, Brunsden D, Noton NH (1991) Ground movement in ventnor, isle of wight. Research contract no. PECD 7/1/272. A report by Geomorphological Services Ltd for the department of environment

  • Luzi L, Pergalani F, Terlien MTJ (2000) Slope vulnerability to earthquakes at subregional scale, using probabilistic techniques and geographic information systems. Eng Geol 58(3–4):313–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles SB, Ho CL (1999) Applications and issues of GIS as tool for civil engineering modeling. J comput civil eng ASCE 13(3):144–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon AT, Olds RJ, Wilson RA, Burman BC (1992) Debris flow zoning at Montrose, Victoria. In: Landslides: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium, February, Bell DH (ed), Christchurch, New Zealand. Balkema AA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, vol 2, pp 1015–1022

  • Morgan GC, Rawlings GE, Sobkowicz JC (1992) Evaluating total risk to communities from large debris flows. In: Geotechnique and natural hazards. Proceedings Geohazards ’92 Symposium, BiTech Publishers, Canada, pp 225–236

  • Pachauri AK, Pant M (1992) Landslide hazard mapping based on geological attributes. Engineering Geology 32(1–2):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri AK, Gupta PV, Chander R (1998) Landslide zoning in a part of the Garhwal Himalayas. Environ Geol 36(3–4):325–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourghasemi HR, Moradi HR, Fatemi AS, Mahdavifar MR, Mohammdi M (2009) Landslide hazard assessment using fuzzy multi criteria decision-making method. Iran J Watershed Manag Sci Eng 3(8):51–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman SA, Aruchamy S, Jegankumar R (2014) Geospatial approach on landslide hazard zonation mapping using multicriteria decision analysis: a study on Coonoor and Ooty, part of Kallar Watershed, The Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-8:1417–1422

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in higherarchial structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation, 1st ed. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, p 502

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with analytic hierarchy process, 1st ed. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, p 527

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2001) Models, methods, concepts, and applications of the analytic hierarchy process, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic, Boston, p 333

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma LP, Debnath P, Patel N, Ghose MK (2009) Landslide vulnerability. My Coordinates V 11:31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu-Quiang W, Unwin DJ (1992) Modelling landslide distribution on loess soils in China: an investigation. Int J geogr inf syst 6(5):391-405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddle HJ, Jones DB, Payne HR (1991) Development of a methodology for landslip potential mapping in the Rhondda Valley. In: Chandler RJ (ed) Slope Stability Engineering, Thomas Telford, London, pp 137–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Süzen ML, Doyuran V (2004) Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment. Turk Eng Geol 71(3–4):303–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas LG (1990) An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 48:2–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadge G (1988) The potential of GIS modelling of gravity flows and slope instabilities. Int J geogr inf syst 2(2):143-152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey). Catena 72:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CH, Lee CF, Li J, Xu ZW (2002) On the spatial relationship between landslides and causative factors on Lantau Island, Hong Kong. Geomorphology 43(3–4):197–207

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Abdul Rahaman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rahaman, S.A., Aruchamy, S. Geoinformatics based landslide vulnerable zonation mapping using analytical hierarchy process (AHP), a study of Kallar river sub watershed, Kallar watershed, Bhavani basin, Tamil Nadu. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 3, 41 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0298-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0298-8

Keywords

Navigation