Skip to main content
Log in

An Adjustable Approach to Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Based on a Preference Relationship Under Fuzzy Soft Information

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group decision-making is a collaborative process to find optimal alternative based on an aggregation judgment. Various techniques have been suggested to solve decision-making problems; however, the rapid growth of uncertainties in industry and organizations highlights the application of fuzzy set theory and soft set theory in this area. In this regard, fuzzy soft model can be considered as an efficient tool in decision-making. To date, different algorithms have been proposed for solving collective decision-making problems based on fuzzy soft set theory. In order to reach the process of consensus, the existing methods have mostly used the t-norms, such as “AND” operator which can be successfully applied to individual decision-making problems including multi-source datasets. However, such approaches fail to consider multi-observer problems in group decision-making processes. Additionally, in the selection step, the existing methods lack a comprehensive priority approach; they focus on a hierarchical preference which ignores incomparable alternatives. To overcome these issues, this paper proposes an adjustable multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on a preference relationship of fuzzy soft sets. First, we construct two topological spaces over the set of objects, and then, develop a preference relationship of objects by using open sets of these two topologies. A multi-phase method is then designed to rank objects in multi-criteria group decision-making problems based on such preference relationship. We also extend the proposed algorithm to weighted case in order to have a higher level of adaptability with real-world problems. Dataset from “www.booking.com” Web site is applied to show the capability of this new method in comparison with results from the well-known literature approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aktas, H., Cagman, N.: Soft sets and soft groups. Inf. Sci. 177, 2726–3332 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alcantud, J.C.R.: A novel algorithm for fuzzy soft set based decision making from multiobserver input parameter data set. Inf. Fusion 29, 142–148 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cagman, N., Enginoglu, S., Citak, F.: Fuzzy soft set theory and its applications. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 137–147 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cagman, N., Karatas, S., Enginoglu, S.: Fuzzy soft matrix theory and its application in decision making. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 9, 109–119 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, D., Tsang, E.C.C., Yeung, D.S., Wang, X.: The parameterization reduction of soft sets and its applications. Comput. Math. Appl. 49, 757–763 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, F., Jun, Y.B., Liu, X., Li, L.: An adjustable approach to fuzzy soft set based decision making. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 234, 10–20 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, F., Li, Y., Leoreanu-Fotea, V.: Application of level soft sets in decision making based on interval-valued fuzzy soft sets. Comput. Math. Appl. 60, 1756–1767 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gorzalczany, M.B.: A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval-valued fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 21, 1–17 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, B.: Comments on Normal parameter reduction in soft set based on particle swarm optimization algorithm. Appl. Math. Model. (in press)

  11. Han, Z.Q., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Luo, X.X.: Group multi-criteria decision making method with triangular type-2 fuzzy numbers. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(4), 673–684 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.J., Merigo, J.M.: Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(4), 1211–1227 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.J., Xu, D.L.: An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf. Sci. 329, 274–286 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, W.S., Liao, H.C.: A bibliometric analysis of fuzzy decision research during 1970–2015. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2016). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0272-z

  15. Jiang, Y., Tang, Y., Chen, Q.: An adjustable application to intuitonistic fuzzy soft sets based decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 35, 824–836 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jun, Y.B.: Soft BCK/BCI-algebras. Comput. Math. Appl. 56, 1408–1413 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Jun, Y.B., Lee, K.J., Zhan, J.: Soft p-ideals of soft BCI-algebras. Comput. Math. Appl. 58, 2060–2068 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Khalid, A., Abbas, M.: Distance measures and operations in intuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set theory. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(3), 490–497 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kharal, A., Ahmad, B.: Mappings on fuzzy soft classes. Adv. Fuzzy Syst. 407890, 3308–3314 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kong, Z., Gao, L., Wang, L., Li, S.: The normal parameter reduction of soft sets and its algorithm. Comput. Math. Appl. 56, 3029–3037 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kong, Z., Gao, L., Wang, L.F.: Comment on “A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems”. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 223, 540–542 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kong, Z., Wang, L., Wu, Z.: Application of fuzzy soft set in decision making problems based on grey theory. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 236, 1521–1530 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Maji, P.K., Roy, A.R.: An application of soft sets in a decision making problem. Comput. Math. Appl. 44, 1077–1083 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Maji, P.K., Biswas, R., Roy, A.R.: Fuzzy soft set. J. Fuzzy Math. 9(3), 589–602 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Maji, P.K., Biswas, R., Roy, A.R.: Intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. J. Fuzzy Math. 9, 677–692 (2001)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Maji, P.K., Biswas, R., Roy, A.R.: Soft set theory. Comput. Math. Appl. 45, 555–562 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Maji, P.K., Roy, A.R., Biswas, R.: On intuitionistic fuzzy soft sets. J. Fuzzy Math. 12, 669–683 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Majumdar, P., Samanta, S.K.: Similarity measure of soft sets. New Math. Nat. Comput. 4(1), 1–12 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Molodtsov, D.: Soft set theory-first results. Comput. Math. Appl. 37, 19–31 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. Int. J. Comput. Inform. Sci. 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Roy, A.R., Maji, P.K.: A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 203, 412–418 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Roy, S., Samanta, T.K.: A note on fuzzy soft topological spaces. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 3(2), 305–311 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Tanay, B., Kandemir, M.B.: Topological structure of fuzzy soft sets. Comput. Math. Appl. 61, 2952–2957 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang, H.: A novel fuzzy soft set approach in decision making based on grey relational analysis and Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. Appl. Soft Comput. 31, 317–325 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang, X., Wang, J., Chen, X.: Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method based on fuzzy structured element with incomplete weight information. Iran. J. Fuzzy Syst. 13(2), 1–17 (2016)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang, C.H., Wang, J.Q.: A multi-criteria decision-making method based on triangular intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. Intell. Autom. Soft Comput. 22(3), 473–482 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Chen, X.H.: Multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on 2-tuple linguistic aggregation operators with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(1), 81–97 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Wei, G.: Approaches to interval intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy multiple attribute decision making with incomplete weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17(3), 484–489 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang, Y., Tan, X., Meng, C.: The multi-fuzzy soft set and its application in decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 37, 4915–4923 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lingras, P.: A decision-theoretic rough set model. In: Ras, Z.W., Zemankova, M., Emrich, M.L. (eds.) Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, pp. 17–24. North-Holland, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 180, 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Yu, S., Wang, J., Wang, J.Q.: An interval type-2 fuzzy likelihood-based MABAC approach and its application in selecting hotels on a tourism website. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0217-6

  43. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zahedi Khameneh, A., Kilicman, A., Salleh, A.R.: Fuzzy soft product topology. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 7(6), 935–947 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Zahedi Khameneh, A., Kilicman, A.: Fuzzy soft boundary. Ann. Fuzzy Math. Inform. 8(5), 687–703 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Zahedi Khameneh, A., Kilicman, A., Salleh, A.R.: An adjustable method for data ranking based on fuzzy soft sets. Indian J. Sci. Technol. doi:10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i21/72587

  47. Zhang, Z.: A rough set approach to intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 36, 4605–4633 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. Zhang, Z., Wang, C., Tian, D., Li, K.: A novel approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy soft set based decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 38, 1255–1270 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang, Z.: Some hesitant multiplicative aggregation operators and their application in group decision making with hesitant multiplicative preference relations. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(2), 177–197 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou, M., Li, S.: Algebraic and topological structures based on novel soft set relations. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 28, 747–756 (2015)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is partially supported by the Institute for Mathematical Research, Universiti Putra Malaysia Grant No.5527179.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests regarding the publication of this article and that they do not have any direct financial relationships that could lead to a conflict of interest for any of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adem Kılıçman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khameneh, A.Z., Kılıçman, A. & Salleh, A.R. An Adjustable Approach to Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Based on a Preference Relationship Under Fuzzy Soft Information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 1840–1865 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0280-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0280-z

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation