Skip to main content
Log in

Sensitivity Analysis of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Solid Transportation Problem

  • Published:
International Journal of Fuzzy Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on sensitivity analysis of intuitionistic fuzzy solid transportation problem (IFSTP). In real-world situation, IFSTP seems to be more realistic than solid transportation problem (STP) as available information is uncertain. Due to degeneracy of IFSTP or that of STP, Type I sensitivity analysis seems to be impractical. Hence , in this paper, a new algorithm is proposed to determine the Type II sensitivity ranges to overcome this problem. A numerical example is illustrated to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed algorithm and the efficiency of recommended method over existing method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Physica- Verlag, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Angelov, P.P.: Optimization in an intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 86, 299–306 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, Z., Liao, H.: A survey of approaches to decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl. Based Syst. 80, 131–142 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, H., Xu, Z., Zeng, X.J., Mengo, J.M.: Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 1211–1227 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tao, Z., Liu, X., Chen, H., et al.: Ranking interval-valued fuzzy numbers with intuitionistic fuzzy possibility degree and its application to fuzzy multi-attribute decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2016). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0193-x

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yuan, J., Li, C.: A new method for multi-attribute decision making with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy random variable. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2016). doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0184-y

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nishad, A.K., Singh, S.R.: Solving multi-objective decision making problem in intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 6, 206–215 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadigheh, A.G., Mirnia, K., Terlaky, T.: Active constraint set invariancy sensitivity analysis in linear optimization. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 133, 303–315 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadigheh, A.G., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear optimization: invariant support set intervals. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 167, 1–19 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen, B., de dong, J.J., Roos, C., Terlaky, T.: Sensitivity analysis in linear programming: just be careful!. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 101, 15–28 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ward, J.E., Wendell, R.E.: Approaches to sensitivity analysis in linear programming. Ann. Oper. Res. 27, 3–38 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Koltai, T., Terlaky, T.: The difference between the managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 65, 257–274 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Intrator, J., Paroush, J.: Sensitivity analysis of the classical transportation problem: a combinatorial approach. Comput. Oper. Res. 4, 213–226 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, C.J.: Determining type II sensitivity ranges of the fractional assignment problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 39, 67–73 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Lin, C.J., Wen, U.P., Lin, P.Y.: Advance sensitivity analysis of the fuzzy assignment problem. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 5341–5349 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kheirfam, B., Verdegay, J.L.: Strict sensitivity analysis in fuzzy quadratic programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 198, 99–111 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebrahimnejad, A., Verdegay, J.L.: A novel approach for sensitivity analysis in linear programs with trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 27, 173–185 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kumar, A., Bhatia, N.: A new method for solving fuzzy sensitivity analysis problems. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. 9(1), 49–64 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kheirfam, B., Hasani, F.: Sensitivity analysis for fuzzy linear programming problems with fuzzy variables. Adv. Model. Optim. 12, 257–272 (2010)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Nasseri, S.H., Ebrahimnejad, A.: Sensitivity analysis on linear programming problems with trapezoidal fuzzy variables. Int. J. Oper. Res. Inf. Syst. 2, 22–39 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dantzig, G.B.: Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1963)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: The stepping stone method of explaining linear programming calculations in transportation problems. Manag. Sci. 1(1), 49–69 (1954)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Dalman, Hasan, Kken, Hale Gonce, Sivri, Mustafa: A solution proposal to indefinite quadratic interval transportation problem. New Trends Math. Sci. 1(2), 7–12 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shell, E.: Distribution of a product by several properties, Directorate of Management Analysis. In: Proceedings of 2nd Symposium on Linear Programming, vol. 2, pp. 615–642. DCS/Comptroller H.Q.U.S.A.F, Washington, DC (1955)

  27. Haley, K.B.: The solid transportation problem. Oper. Res. 11, 446–448 (1962)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Bit, A.K., Biswal, M.P., Alam, S.S.: Fuzzy programming approach to multi—objective solid transportation problem. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 57, 183–194 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Pramanik, S., Jana, D.K., Maiti, M.: Multi-objective solid transportation problem in imprecise environments. J. Transp. Secur. 6, 131–150 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dalman, H.: Uncertain programming model for multi-item solid transportation problem. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. (2016). doi:10.1007/s13042-016-0538-7

  31. Dalman, H., Nuran, G., Mustafa, S.: A fuzzy set-based approach to multi-objective multi-item solid transportation problem under uncertainty. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18, 716–729 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Dejian, Y., Huchang, L.: Visualization and quantitative research on intuitionistic fuzzy studies. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30, 3653–3663 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De, P.K. Debaroti, D.,: Ranking of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, 2012. In: 12th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA), pp. 184–188 (2012)

  34. Pandian, P., Kavitha, K.: Sensitivity analysis in solid transportation problems. Appl. Math. Sci. 6, 6787–6796 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank the editor and anonymous referees for their valuable suggestions and comments. Corresponding author would like to thank “Council of Scientific and Industrial Research”, New Delhi, India, for its financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chavi Gupta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aggarwal, S., Gupta, C. Sensitivity Analysis of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Solid Transportation Problem. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19, 1904–1915 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0292-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-016-0292-8

Keywords

Navigation