Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Porous Media on Hydraulic Jump Characteristics by Using Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Method

  • Research paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to understand the effect of porous media on hydraulic jumps, a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) model is applied to investigate the characteristics of hydraulic jumps interacting with porous media. Various porosities including cases without an obstacle or with a solid obstacle or porous media are considered. The opening of a gate was altered to adjust the hydraulic jump. The conjugate depth ratio, bottom shear stress distribution, and energy dissipation are reported. In the present study, validations are in a good agreement with previous studies. Overall, the result showed that the average error between numerical and experimental data was less than 7.2%. Energy dissipation is compared among cases with three porosities, with and without a solid obstacle. The porosity of 0.68 is found to dissipate more energy than do other porosities. Thus, porous media can be used to enhance energy dissipation of hydraulic jumps in an open channel. In conclusion, the proposed SPH model can simulate the effect of porous media on hydraulic jump characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohamed Ali HS (1994) Efficiency of stilling basins. In: Natural conference publication institution of engineers, Australia, pp 229–233

  2. Hughes WC, Flack JE (1984) Hydraulic jump properties over a rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 110(12):1755–1771

    Google Scholar 

  3. Riad PHS (2008) A study of the hydraulic performance of stilling basins using physical and numerical models, Master Thesis. UNESCO-IHE Institute. Netherlands

  4. Alikhani A, Benrozi-Rad R, Fathi-Moghadam M (2010) Hydraulic jump in stilling basin with vertical end sill. Int J Phys Sci 5(1):025–029

    Google Scholar 

  5. Habibzadeh A, Wu S, Ade F, Rajaratnam N (2011) Exploratory study of submerged hydraulic jumps with blocks. J Hydraul Eng 137(6):706–710

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barani GA, Rahnama MB, Sohrabipoor N (2005) Investigation of flow energy dissipation over different stepped spillways. Am J Appl Sci 2(6):1101–1105

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ead SA, Rajaratnam N (2002) Hydraulic jumps on corrugated beds. J Hydraul Eng 128(7):656–663

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrence GA (1993) The hydraulics of steady two-layer flow over a fixed obstacle. J Fluid Mech 254:605–633

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim Y, Choi G, Park H, Byeon S (2015) Hydraulic jump and energy dissipation with sluice gate over a rough bed. Water 7:5115–5130

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ljubicic R, Zindovic B, Volj P, Pavlovic D, Kapor R, Savic L (2018) Hydraulic jumps in adverse-slope stilling basins for stepped spillways. Water 10:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  11. Takatsu Y, Masuoka T (2005) Transition process to turbulent flow in porous media. In: Proceedings of international mechanical engineering and exposition (IMECE 2005). Orlando, Florida USA

  12. Higuera P, del Jesus M, Lara JL, Lusada IJ, Guanche Y, Barajas G (2011) Numerical simulation of three dimensional breaking waves on a gravel slope using two-phase flow Navier–Stokes model. In: Fifth international conference on advance computational method in engineering (ACOMEN 2011). Liege, Belgium

  13. Smeulders DMJ, van Dongen MEH (1997) Wave propagation in a porous media containing a dilute gas–liquid mixture: theory and experiments. J Fluid Mech 343:351–373

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang JG, Leung CF, Chow YK (2003) Numerical solution for flow in porous media. Int J Numer Method Anal Method Geomech 27(7):565–583

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu GR, Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: a Meshfree particle method. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Monaghan JJ (1992) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics, annual reviews. Astron Astrophys 30(1):543–574

    Google Scholar 

  17. Antoci C, Gallati M, Sibilla S (2007) Numerical simulation of fluid-structure interaction by SPH. Comput Struct 85(11):879–890

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yim SC, Yuk D, Panizzo A, Di Risio M, Liu PLF (2008) Numerical simulations of wave generation by a vertical plunger using RANS and SPH models. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 134(3):143–159

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shao S, Incompressible SPH (2006) Simulation of wave breaking and overtopping with turbulence modeling. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 50(5):597–621

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lopez D, Marivela R, Garrote L (2010) Smoothed particle hydrodynamics model applied to hydraulic structures: a hydraulic jump test case. J Hydraul Res 48(1):142–158

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chang TJ, Kao HM, Chang KH, Hsu MH (2011) Numerical simulation of Shallow–Water dam break flows in open channels using smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Hydrol 408:78–90

    Google Scholar 

  22. Federico I, Marrone S, Colagrossi A, Aristodemo F, Antuono M (2012) Simulating 2D open-channel flows through a SPH model. Eur J Mech B Fluids 34:35–46

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Chern MJ, Syamsuri S (2012) The effect of corrugated bed on hydraulic jump characteristic using SPH method. J Hydraul Eng 139(2):221–232

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jonsson P, Jonsen P, Andreasson P, Lundstrom TS, Hellstrom JGI (2016) Smoothed particle hydrodynamic modelling of hydraulic jumps: bulk parameters and free surface fluctuations. Engineering 8:386–402

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bayraktar OY, Citoglu GS, Caglar H, Caglar A, Arslan M, Cetin M (2018) The mechanical properties of the different cooling requirements of high temperature applied plaster. Fresenius Environ Bull 27(8):5399–5409

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brooks RM, Cetin M (2012) Application of construction demolition waste for improving performance of subgrade and subbase layers. Int J Res Rev Appl Sci 12(3):375–381

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cetin M (2015) Consideration of permeable pavement in landscape architecture. J Environ Protect Ecol 16(1):385–392

    Google Scholar 

  28. Colagrossi A (2003) A meshless Lagrangian method for free surface and interface flows with fragmentation, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rome. Italy

  29. Delorme L, Colagrossi A, Souto-Iglesias A, Zamora-Rodriguez R, Botia-Vera E (2009) A set of canonical problems in sloshing, Part I: pressure field in forced roll-comparison between experimental results and SPH. Ocean Eng 36(2):168–178

    Google Scholar 

  30. Monaghan JJ, Kos A, Issa N (2003) Fluid motion generated by impact. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 129(6):250–259

    Google Scholar 

  31. Capone T, Panizzo A, Cecioni C, Dalrymple RA (2007) Accuracy and stability of numerical schemes in SPH. In: Proceedings of SPHERIC second international workshop, Madrid, Spain

  32. Dalrymple RA, Rogers BD (2006) Numerical modeling of water waves with the SPH method. Coast Eng 53(2):141–147

    Google Scholar 

  33. Khayyer A, Gotoh H (2008) Development of CMPS method for accurate water-surface tracking in breaking waves. Coast Eng J 50(2):179–207

    Google Scholar 

  34. Morris JP, Fox PJ, Zhu Y (1997) Modeling lower reynolds number incompressible flows using SPH. J Comput Phys 136(1):214–226

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Gotoh H, Shibahara T, Sakai T (2001) Sub-particle-scale turbulence model for the MPS method-Lagrangian flow model for hydraulic engineering. Adv Methods Comput Fluid Dyn 9(4):339–347

    Google Scholar 

  36. Shao S, Lo EYM (2003) Incompressible SPH method for simulating Newtonian and non-Newtonian flows with a free surface. Adv Water Resour 26(7):787–800

    Google Scholar 

  37. Blin L, Hadjadj A, Vervisch L (2003) Large Eddy simulation of turbulent flows in reversing system. J Turbul 4(1):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smagorinsky J (1963) General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev 91(3):99–164

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lo EYM, Shao S (2002) Simulation of near-shore solitary wave mechanics by an incompressible SPH method. Appl Ocean Res 24(5):275–286

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bonet JR, Lok TSL (1999) Variational and momentum preservation aspects of smooth particle hydrodynamic formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 180(1):97–115

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Colagrossi A, Landrini M (2003) Numerical simulation of interfacial flows by smoothed particle hydrodynamics. J Comput Phys 191(2):448–475

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Dilts GA (1999) Moving-least-squares-particle hydrodynamics: I. Consistency and stability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 44(8):1115–1155

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Panizzo A (2004) Physical and numerical modelling of sub-aerial landslide generated waves, Ph.D. Dissertation. Universita degli studi di L’Aquila, Italy

  44. Crespo AJC, Gomez-Gesteira M, Dalrymple RA (2007) Boundary conditions generated by dynamic particles in SPH methods. CMC Comput Mater Contin 5(3):173–184

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Peskin CS (1977) Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys 25(3):220–252

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Monaghan JJ, Kos A (1999) Solitary waves on a Cretan beach. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 125(3):145–154

    Google Scholar 

  47. Chanson H (2004) The hydarulics of open channel flow : an introduction, 2nd edn. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  48. Prinos P, Sofialidis D, Keramaris E (2003) Turbulent flow over and within a porous bed. J Hydraul Eng 129(9):720–733

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude for the financial support given by Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (Project No.: MOST 107-2212-E-011-075-MY3). The authors are grateful to Dr. David Lopez, Dr. Benedict Rogers, Prof. O.M. Faltinsen, Dr. A. Calogrossi, Dr. Rui Xu, and Dr. Songdong Shao for the helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Institut Teknologi Adhi Tama Surabaya, Jl.Arief Rachman Hakim 100, Surabaya, 60117, Indonesia

    Syamsuri

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, 43 Keelung Road, Taipei, 10607, Taiwan

    Ming-Jyh Chern

  3. Department of Physics, Islamic Azad University, Imam Ali Complex, Moazen Blvd, Karaj, Tehran, Iran

    Nima Vaziri

Authors
  1. Syamsuri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ming-Jyh Chern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nima Vaziri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Syamsuri.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Syamsuri, Chern, MJ. & Vaziri, N. Effect of Porous Media on Hydraulic Jump Characteristics by Using Smooth Particle Hydrodynamics Method. Int J Civ Eng 18, 367–379 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00465-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-019-00465-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation