Skip to main content
Log in

Applying Delphi method in prioritizing intensity of flooding in Ivar watershed in Iran

  • Published:
Spatial Information Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The management of watersheds and determining intensity of sub-watershed flooding are the major factors in determining prioritization and policy. The present study was conducted to investigate the intensity of flooding by Delphi technique using six criteria of rainfall, snow, slope, vegetation, land form, and land type in Ivar watershed, NE Iran. For this purpose, 20 questionnaires with the different weighting of criteria were selected and based on final scores, the intensity of flooding were classified in five classes viz. very low, low, medium, high, and very high. After that, the criteria were prioritized based on percentage and degree of importance. The results showed rainfall is a significant criterion in flooding of Ivar watershed. In addition, two sub-watersheds were in class of very low intensity of flooding, one sub-watershed in low intensity class, six sub-watersheds in medium intensity class, nine sub-watersheds in high intensity class, and three sub-watersheds in very high intensity class. Sub-watersheds of I’3, I10 and I’8 had the highest intensity of flooding, while sun-watersheds of I’9 and I’4 reached the lowest intensity of flooding which were placed in last priority. I’3 was considered as the most flooding sub-watershed due to high precipitation. Hence, using Delphi method is a useful and practical technique in investigating the intensity of flooding for different area based on their criteria and sub-criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mahdavi, M. (2009). Applied hydrology (2nd ed., 402 p.). Tehran: Tehran University Press. (in Persian)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Negaresh, H., Tavosi, T., & Mehdinasab, M. (2011). Investigating the flooding intensity of Kashkan river. Natural Geography Journal, 4(13), 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Najmaie, M. (1990). Engineering hydrology (2nd ed.). University of Science and Technology Press.

  4. Avrand, R., Torabipoudeh, H., & Farzaie, A. (2006). Sensitive analysis of HEC-1 to impute parameters. In 7th international symposium of River engineering. Ahvaz.

  5. Jokar, J. (2002). Investigating the flooding of Shapoor River using simulation of storm flows, M.Sc. Thesis. Tarbiat Modares University.

  6. Brooks, K. N., Ffolliott, P. F., & Magner, J. A. (2012). Hydrology and the management of watersheds. Wiley.

  7. Adler, M., & Ziglio, E. (1996). Gazing into the Oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health (p. 829). London: Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helmer, O. (1977). Problems in futures research: Delphi and causal cross-impact analysis. Futures, 9(1), 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353–375.

  10. Wissema, J. G. (1982). Trends in technology forecasting. R&D Management, 12(1), 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Khosroshahi, M. (2002). The flooding intensity of Damavand watersheds, Ph.D. Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University.

  12. Majnonian, H. (1997). Environmental evaluation of regions to determine national park. Ecology Journal, 19, 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abdi, P., & Rasoli, M. (2001). Zoning the flooding of Zanjan watershed using GIS. In The symposium of problems and solutions in Karon and Zaiandaerood.

  14. De Las Heras, J., Salvatore, R., Rodrigues, M. J., Lovreglio, R., Leone, V., Giaquinto, P., & Notarnicola, A. (2007). Wildfire motivation survey through the Delphi method. In Conference Paper ‘Wildfire 2007’Sevilla, España (pp. 1–10).

  15. Ghaemi, H., & Morid, S. (2006). Flooding model of Karkheh sub-watersheds. Nivar Journal, 30, 150.

  16. Gholami, M. H., Farhoosh, T., & Ariani, J. (2005). An application of Delphi technique in determining the strategic goals of oil, gas and petrochemical management. In First national conference on safety engineering and management of HSE.

  17. Crippen, J. R. (1982). Envelope curves for extreme flood events. ASCE Journal of the Hydraulics Division, 108(4), 1208–1212.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Monirul, M. D., & Sado, K. (2000). Development of flood hazard maps Bangladesh using NOAA-AVHRR images with GIS. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 45(3), 337–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mohammadi-Motlag, R., Jalalkamali, N., & Jalalkamali, A. (2013). The role of sub-watershed in flooding in Dalki watershed. Journal of Irrigation and Water Engineering, 4(13), 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Danehkar, A., & Hadadiniar, S. (2009). Weighting and ranking ecotourism for planning in desert and semi-desert ecosystems with Delphi. Journal of Natural Resources Development and Management, 2(2), 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Anada, J., & Herath, G. (2008). Multi-attribute preference modelling and regional land-use planning. Ecological Economics, 65, 325–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Derakhshan, S. (2010). The study of flooding in Kasilian watershed using GIS. Geographical Sciences Applied Research, 13(16), 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Shojaei.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheshmidari, M.N., Hatefi Ardakani, A.H., Alipor, H. et al. Applying Delphi method in prioritizing intensity of flooding in Ivar watershed in Iran. Spat. Inf. Res. 25, 173–179 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0086-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0086-6

Keywords

Navigation