Abstract
Deforestation threatens biodiversity in remaining forest in India. Today majority of populated areas are facing huge anthropogenic deforestation and it is one of the greatest problems in our country. For the sustainable management of forest there is a need of prediction about the probability of deforestation, i.e. which areas are most susceptibility to deforestation. This study reveals a methodology for predicting the areas of deforestation based on cultural and natural landscape. Geographical information system and logistic regression have been used to predict the greatest propensity for the deforestation of Pathro river basin. The logistic regression model has proven that the deforestation is an integrated function of altitude, slope, slope aspect, distance from road, settlement, river and forest edge. The independent variables are strongly correlated with deforestation. Finally, the receiver operating characteristic curve has been drawn for the validation of deforestation probability map and the area under the curve (AUC) is commuted for verification and measurement of level of accuracy. The AUC for the logistic regression model has shown 76.6% prediction accuracy. The result reveals that the performance logistic regression is good enough in simulation of deforestation process. This model also predicted the areas with high potential for future deforestation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Oliver, J. G. J., Kasibhatla, P. S., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2009). CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience, 2, 737–738.
Eastman, J. R. (2001). IDRISI 32 Andes guide to GIS and image processing. Worcester: Clark University.
Kushwaha, S. P. S., Nandy, S., Ahmad, M., & Agarwal, R. (2011). Forest ecosystem dynamics assessment and predictive modelling in eastern Himalaya. ISPRS Archives XXXVIII- 8/W20. In Workshop proceedings: Earth observation for terrestrial ecosystems, 8 November, Bhopal, India.
Sun, J., & Southworth, J. (2013). Remote sensing-based fractal analysis and scale dependence associated with forest fragmentation in an Amazon tri-national frontier. Remote Sensing, 5, 454–472.
Nandy, S., Kushwaha, S. P. S., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2007). Monitoring Chilla-Motichur corridor using geospatial tools. Journal for Nature Conservation, 15(4), 237–244.
Gayen, A., & Saha, S. (2017). Application of Weights-of-evidence (WoE) and evidential belief function (EBF) models of soil erosion vulnerable zones: a study on Pathro river basin, Jharkhand India. Model Earth System, 3(3), 1123–1139.
Gubbi, S. (2012). Patterns and correlates of human-elephant conflict around a south India reserve. Biological Conservation, 148(1), 88–95.
Terranova, O., Antronico, L., Coscarelli, R., & Iaquinta, P. (2009). Soil erosion risk scenarios in Mediterrancan environment using RUSLE and GIS: an application model for Calabria (southern Italy). Geomorphology, 112, 228–245.
Srivastava, S., Singh, T. P., Singh, H., Kushwaha, S. P. S., & Roy, P. S. (2002). Mapping of large-scale deforestation in Sonitpur district. Assam. CurrSc, 82(12), 1479–1484.
Rahman, M. R., & Saha, S. K. (2009). Spatial dynamics of cropland and cropping pattern change analysis using Landsat TM and IRS P6 LISS III satellite images with GIS. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 12(2), 123–134.
Arekhi, S. (2011). Modeling spatial pattern of deforestation using GIS and logistic regression: a case study of northern Ilam forests, Ilam province Iran. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(72), 16236–16249.
Houet, T., & Hubert-Moy, L. (2006). Modelling and projecting land use and land cover changes with a cellular automaton in considering landscape trajectories: an improvement for simulation of plausible future states. EARSeL eProceedings, 5(1), 63–76.
Jenerette, G. D., & Wu, J. (2001). Analysis and simulation of land use change in the central Arizona- Phoenix region USA. Landscape Ecology, 16(7), 611–626.
Pontius, R. G., Jr., & Schneider, L. C. (2001). Land-cover change model validation by an ROC method for the Ipswich watershed, Massachusetts, USA. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 85(1–3), 239–248.
Pontius, R. G., Jr., & Malanson, J. (2005). Comparison of the structure and accuracy of two land change models. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19(2), 243–265.
Kumar, R., Nandy, S., Agarwal, R., & Kushwaha, S. P. S. (2014). Forest cover dynamics analysis and prediction modelling using logistic regression model. Ecological Indicators, 45, 444–455.
Weier, J., & Herring, D. (2000). Measuring vegetation (NDVI & EVI). Earth observatory, August 30, NASA, http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/MeasuringVegetation.
Eastman, J. R. (2006). IDRISI 15 Andes guide to GIS and image processing. Worcester: Clark University.
Ludeke, A. K., Maggio, R. C., & Reid, L. M. (1990). An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. Journal of Environmental Management, 31, 247–259.
Amor, D., & Pfaff, A. (2008). Early history of the impact of road investments on deforestation in the Mayan forest. In Working paper, Nicholas School of the Environment and Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Wilkie, D., Shaw, E., Rotberg, F., Morelli, G., & Auzels, P. (2000). Roads, development and conservation in the Congo Basin. Conservation Biology, 14, 1614–1622.
Bayat, M. F. (2000). Surveying of the relationship between vegetation cover and some environmental variables (altitude, aspect and slope). Pajouhesh-va-Sazandegi, 4, 24–27.
Måren, I. E., Karki, S., Prajapati, C., et al. (2015). Facing north or south: Does slope aspect impact forest stand characteristics and soil properties in a semiarid trans-Himalayan valley? Journal of Arid Environments, 121, 112–123.
Chakravaty, S., Ghosh, S. K., Suresh, C. P., Dey, A. N., & Shukla, G. (2012). Deforestation: Causes, effects and control strategies, global prespectiveson sustainable forest management, Dr. Dr. Clement A. Okia (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0569-5, In Tech, April 25, https://doi.org/10.5772/33342, Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/globalperspectives-on-sustainable-foresmanagement/deforestation-causes-effects-and-control-strategies.
Liebetrau, A. M. (1983). Comparison of a cellular automata network and an individual-based model for the simulation of forest dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 121, 277–293.
Rivera, S., de Martinez, A. P., Ramsey, R. D., & Crowl, T. A. (2012). Spatial modelling of tropical deforestation using socioeconomic and biophysical data. Small-scale Forestry, 12, 321–334.
Tien, B. D., Pradhan, B., Lofman, O., Revhaug, I., & Dick, O. B. (2012). Spatial prediction of soil erosion hazards in HoaBinh province (Vietnam): a comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models. CATENA, 96, 28–40.
Linkie, M., Smitha, R. J., & Leader-Williams, N. (2004). Mapping and predicting deforestation patterns in the lowlands of Sumatra. Biodiversity Conservation, 13, 1809–1818.
Amini, M. R., Shataee, S. H., Moaieri, M. H., & Ghazanfari, H. (2009). Deforestation modeling and investigation on related physiographic and human factors using satellite images and GIS (Case study: Armardeh forests of Baneh). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 17, 431–443.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to convey cordial thanks to our respected teachers of Department of Geography, University of Gour Banga, who have always been mentally, supported us. At last, authors would like to acknowledge all of the agencies and individuals specially, Survey of India, Geological Survey of India and USGS for obtaining the maps and data required for the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gayen, A., Saha, S. Deforestation probable area predicted by logistic regression in Pathro river basin: a tributary of Ajay river. Spat. Inf. Res. 26, 1–9 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0151-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-017-0151-1