Abstract
In their opinion paper "The unpredictable risk imposed by microbial secondary metabolites: how safe is biological control of plant diseases?" (J. Plant Dis. Prot. 124, 413-419; https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-017-0109-5), H.B. Deising, I. Gase and Y. Kubo criticize the use of microbial pesticides in plant protection. They point to the ability of microorganisms to form toxic metabolites and fear severe health problems when antagonistic microorganisms are increasingly released into agro-ecosystems. In our opinion, this view fails to reflect the reality because it largely ignores the ecology of microorganisms. In this contribution, we state reasons why biocontrol of plant diseases is a safe technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Alavi P, Starcher MR, Zachow C, Müller H, Berg G (2013) Root-microbe systems: the effect and mode of interaction of stress protecting agent (SPA) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T. Front Plant Sci 4:141
Atanasova L, Le Crom S, Gruber S, Coulpier F, Seidl-Seiboth V, Kubicek CP, Druzhinina IS (2013) Comparative transcriptomics reveals different strategies of Trichoderma mycoparasitism. BMC Genom 14:121
Barnett S, Zhao S, Ballard R, Franco C (2017) Selection of microbes for control of Rhizoctonia root rot on wheat using a high throughput pathosystem. Biol Control 113:45–57
Berendsen RL, Pieterse CMJ, Bakker PAHM (2012) The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci 17:478–486
Berg G, Köberl M, Müller H, Rybakova D, Grosch R, Smalla K (2017) Plant microbial diversity is suggested as the key to future biocontrol and health trends. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93(5):fix050. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix050
Card S, Johnson L, Teasdale S, Caradus J (2016) Deciphering endophyte behaviour: the link between endophyte biology and efficacious biological control agents. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 92(8):fiw114. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw114
Erlacher A, Cardinale M, Grosch R, Grube M, Berg G (2014) The impact of the pathogen Rhizoctonia solani and its beneficial counterpart Bacillus amyloliquefaciens on the indigenous lettuce microbiome. Front Microbiol 5:175
Ghoul M, Mitri S (2016) The ecology and evolution of microbial competition. Trends Microbiol 24:833–845
Haas D, Défago G (2005) Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:307
Hennessy RC, Glaring MA, Olsson S, Stougaard P (2017) Transcriptomic profiling of microbe–microbe interactions reveals the specific response of the biocontrol strain P. fluorescens In5 to the phytopathogen Rhizoctonia solani. BMC Res Notes 10:376
Kröber M, Wibberg D, Grosch R, Eikmeyer F, Verwaaijen B, Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Pühler A, Schlüter A (2014) Effect of the strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 on the microbial community in the rhizosphere of lettuce under field conditions analyzed by whole metagenome sequencing. Front Microbiol 5:252
Ligon JM, Hill DS, Hammer PE, Torkewitz NR, Hofmann D, Kempf HJ, van Pee KH (2000) Natural products with antifungal activity from Pseudomonas biocontrol bacteria. Pest Manag Sci 56:688–695
Mavrodi DV, Mavrodi OV, Parejko JA, Bonsall RF, Kwak YS, Paulitz TC, Thomashow LS, Weller DM (2011) Accumulation of the antibiotic phenazine-1-carboxylic acid in the rhizosphere of dryland cereals. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:804–812
Parke JL, Gurian-Sherman D (2001) Diversity of the Burkholderia cepacia complex and implications for risk assessment of biological control strains. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:225–258
Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Leeuwenhoek 81:537–547
Scheepmaker JWA, van de Kassteele J (2011) Effects of chemical control agents and microbial biocontrol agents on numbers of non-target microbial soil organisms: a meta-analysis. Biocontrol Sci Technol 21:1225–1242
Scherwinski K, Grosch R, Berg G (2008) Effect of bacterial antagonists on lettuce: active biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and negligible, short-term effects on nontarget microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 64:106–116
Schmidt CS, Alavi M, Cardinale M, Müller H, Berg G (2012) Stenotrophomonas rhizophila DSM14405T promotes plant growth probably by altering fungal communities in the rhizosphere. Biol Fertil Soils 48:947–960
Schulz JS, Römmert A-K, Dammann U, Strack D (1999) The endophyte-host interaction: a balanced antagonism? Mycol Res 103:1275–1283
van Elsas JD, Chiurazzi M, Mallon CA, Elhottova D, Kristufek V, Salles JF (2012) Microbial diversity determines the invasion of soil by a bacterial pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:1159–1164
Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A (2015) The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol 206:1196–1206
Yin C, Hulbert SH, Schroeder KL, Mavrodi O, Mavrodi D, Dhingra A, Schillinger DF, Paulitz TC (2013) Role of bacterial communities in the natural suppression of Rhizoctonia solani bare patch disease of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Appl Environ Microbiol 79:7428–7438
Young VB (2017) The role of the microbiome in human health and disease: an introduction for clinicians. BMJ 356:j831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, E., Ole Becker, J., Berg, G. et al. Biocontrol of plant diseases is not an unsafe technology!. J Plant Dis Prot 125, 121–125 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0158-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41348-018-0158-4