Abstract
Tracking devices help the elderly patients to remain safe, secure and traceable in case of getting lost or in an emergency. This research work was conducted to evaluate the appropriateness of few commercially available tracking devices for aging people, by identifying their usefulness, efficiency, limitations and further improvements. Research involved two steps; literature review about two existing tracking devices simply termed device A and device B, followed by a performance and comparative analysis of the aforementioned devices by applying basic statistics on the results obtained from a questionnaire survey. Devices were used by two groups of people: aging (>70 year old) and middle-aged patients (less than 70 years old) who reported their satisfaction levels about the said devices on a scale of one to five. These devices were found helpful in reducing the dependency of the elderly on others and raised their privacy values. However, these were not recommended for severe memory loss or later stage of critical staged dementia patients because learning and memorizing the process of handling these devices can be difficult for them. Overall, the performance of device B outplayed device A while comparing all considered device parameters. The calling feature of device B appeared to be an appealing characteristic with mean satisfaction levels of 4.9 ± 0.32 and 4.7 ± 0.48 as reported by the middle-aged and aging groups, respectively. These devices will be helpful in decreasing unnecessary rush at health care centers or lost person reporting in police. In upcoming years, these devices can be developed to remotely monitor the movement of the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Older Americans 2016: Key Indicators of Well-Being (2016). https://agingstats.gov/. Accessed 12 Feb 2017
Giacalone D, Wendin K, Kremer S, Frøst MB, Bredie WL, Olsson V, Otto MH, Skjoldborg S, Lindberg U, Risvik E (2016) Health and quality of life in an aging population–Food and beyond. Food Qual Prefer 31(47):166–170
Memory diseases in Finland (2015). http://www.muistiliitto.fi/en/memory-diseases/. Accessed 15 Feb 2017
Sendra S, Granell E, Lloret J, Rodrigues JJ (2014) Smart collaborative mobile system for taking care of disabled and elderly people. Mob Netw Appl 19(3):287–302
Rosati RJ (2009) Evaluation of remote monitoring in home health care. In: International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, IEEE, Cancun, pp 151–153. doi:10.1109/eTELEMED.2009.48
Goroll AH, Simon SR, Tripathi M, Ascenzo C, Bates DW (2009) Community-wide implementation of health information technology: the Massachusetts ehealth collaborative experience. J Am Med Inform Assoc 16:132–139
Chou CC, Chang CP, Lee TT, Chou HF, Mills ME (2013) Technology acceptance and quality of life of the elderly in a telecare program. CIN: Comput Inf Nurs 31(7):335–342
Kaplan B, Litewka S (2008) Ethical challenges of telemedicine and telehealth. Camb Q Healthc Eth 17:401–416
Tunick M (2009) Privacy in public places: do GPS and video surveillance provide plain views? Soc Theory Pract 35(4):597–622
Landau R, Werner S, Auslander GK, Shoval N, Heinik J (2009) Attitudes of family and professional caregivers towards the use of GPS for tracking patients with dementia: an exploratory study. Br J Soc Work 39:670–692
Global positioning system (2016). http://www.gps.gov/. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
Noam S, Gail A, Kineret CS, Michal I, Ruth L, Jeremia H (2010) What can we learn about the mobility of the elderly in the GPS era? J Transp Geogr 18(5):603–612
Milligan Christine, Roberts Celia, Mort Maggie (2011) Telecare and older people: who cares where? Soc Sci Med 72(3):347–354
Rashidi P, Mihailidis A (2013) A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 17(3):579–590
Munir MW, Perälä S, Mäkelä K (2012) Utilization and impacts of GPS tracking in healthcare: a research study for elderly care. Int J Comput Appl 45(11):35–37
Location data systems LDS oy (2015) http://www.lds.fi. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
GH4000 Handheld GNSS/GSM Tracker (2015). http://www.teltonika.lt/product/gh4000-handheld-gnss-gsm-tracker/. Accessed 10 Jan 2017
Allan R (2010) Medical devices get ready to make house calls. Electron Des 58(2):33–40
Landau R, Auslander GK, Werner S, Shoval N, Heinik J (2010) Families’ and professional caregivers’ views of using advanced technology to track people with dementia. Qual Health Res 20(3):409–419
Mäkelä K (2010) Assessment of well-being technology at home. Int Hyvite Symp Wellbeing Technol 2010 4:10–12
Faucounau V, Riguet M, Orvoen G, Lacombe A, Rialle V, Extra J, Rigaud AS (2009) Electronic tracking system and wandering in Alzheimer’s disease: a case study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 52:579–587
Munir MW, Mäkelä K, Perälä S (2010) Assessment of GPS tracking devices for elderly care. Int Hyvite Symp Wellbeing Technol 4:21
What is A-GPS? How does it work? (2013). http://tech2.in.com/features/all/what-is-agps-how-does-it-work/115142. Accessed 25 Jan 2017
Demiris G, Doorenbos AZ, Towle C (2009) Ethical considerations regarding the use of technology for older adults: the case of telehealth. Res Gerontol Nurs 2(2):128–136
Hofmann B (2013) Ethical challenges with welfare technology: a review of the literature. Sci Eng Eth 19(2):389–406
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to EPTEK ry, Seinäjoki, as they provided their GPS tracking devices for this research work. We are also thankful to Professor Kari Mäkelä and Mr. Sami Perälä for their guidance in this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Munir, M.W., Shahid, N., Omair, S.M. et al. Comparative investigation of remote tracking devices for aging care. Int. j. inf. tecnol. 9, 261–266 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-017-0034-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-017-0034-7