Skip to main content
Log in

A Mini-drone Development, Genetic Vector Field-Based Multi-agent Path Planning, and Flight Tests

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we detail the development of mini-drones and propose a Genetic Vector Field (GVF) algorithm for multi-agent path planning. The developed mini-drone has a compact size, with a wheelbase of 130 mm and mass of 76 g, including all the sensors necessary for autonomous flight in an outdoor environment. In addition, the mini-drone can successfully complete a complex multi-agent flight mission via the integrated Linux computer and wireless network system that allows real-time feedback. The control system of the mini-drone is designed as based on the dynamics established by the system identification process, which is developed as based on actual flight data; in addition, a complementary filter is adopted for the navigation algorithm to reduce computational cost, which is essential to increasing the update rate. The proposed GVF algorithm utilizes a vector field algorithm to generate the path to track the given target while also avoiding collisions with other agents and obstacles. Moreover, because the GVF algorithm optimally allocates the targets to each agent using a modified genetic algorithm, the proposed algorithm can generate optimal paths for multiple agents. This algorithm has been implemented in the integrated Linux computer of the mini-drone, and the feasibility has been verified by carrying out several flight tests in actual outdoor environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

F f :

Forgetting factor

ω c :

Cut-off frequency

θ cmd,sum ϕ cmd,sum :

Attitude control command (pitch, roll)

C lon C lat C down :

Coefficient reflecting drag effect (longitudinal, lateral, and downward)

v lon,wind v lat,wind :

Wind speed (longitudinal and lateral)

C thr :

Throttle coefficient

u thr u thr,trim :

Throttle input and throttle trim

u FL,lon u FL,lat u FL,down :

Control input to feedback linearization controller

r :

Yaw rate

a lon a lat a down :

Linear acceleration (longitudinal, lateral, and downward)

\( \hat{a}_{\text{lon}} \,\,\,\hat{a}_{\text{lat}} \,\,\,\hat{a}_{\text{down}} \) :

Estimated linear acceleration (longitudinal, lateral, and downward)

L lon L lat L down :

Luenberger observer gain (longitudinal, lateral, and downward)

t k,elapsed :

Elapsed time of kth member

f k :

Fitness value of kth member

\( \vec{A}_{\text{VF,unsat}} \,\,\,\vec{A}_{\text{VF}} \) :

Acceleration vector from vector field (unsaturated and saturated)

\( \vec{r}_{\text{T}} \,\,\,\vec{r}_{{{\text{a}},i}} \,\,\,\vec{r}_{{{\text{o}},i}} \) :

Relative position vector (target, ith agent, ith obstacle)

\( \vec{e}_{\text{T}} \,\,\,\vec{e}_{{{\text{a}},i}} \,\,\,\vec{e}_{{{\text{o}},i}} \) :

Unit vector of relative position vector (target, ith agent, ith obstacle)

k VF :

Vector field gain

\( \vec{V}_{\text{VF,unsat}} \,\,\,\vec{V}_{\text{VF}} \) :

Velocity vector from vector field (unsaturated and saturated)

\( \vec{V}_{\text{cur}} \) :

Current velocity vector

T s :

Sampling time

\( \vec{A}_{\text{cmd}} \) :

Acceleration command vector

T * :

Optimally assigned target

M k :

kth member

POP_SIZE:

Population size

MAX_ITER:

Maximum number of iterations

MAX_ACC:

Maximum acceleration magnitude

MAX_VEL:

Maximum velocity magnitude

References

  1. Gati B (2013) Open source autopilot for academic research—the Paparazzi system. Am Control Conf (ACC) 2013:1478–1481. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACC.2013.6580045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Meier L, Tanskaren P, Fraundorfer F, Pollefeys M (2011) PIXHAWK: a system for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 2992–2997. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2011.5980229

  3. Lim H, Park J, Lee D, Kim HJ (2012) Build your own quadrotors: open-source projects on unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 19(3):33–45. https://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2205629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kang J, Lee D, Shim DH (2016) Development of mini drone platform based on Linux computer. In: Proceedings of the KSAS 2016 fall conference, pp 575–576

  5. Lee D, Cho S, Shim DH (2017) Development of mini quadrotor platform and experiments on outdoor autonomous swarming flight. J Inst Control Robot Syst 23(11):905–911. https://doi.org/10.5302/J.ICROS.2017.17.0167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee D, Shim DH (2017) Development of mini quadrotor platform and outdoor autonomous swarming flight using 20 quadrotors. In: Proceedings of the KSAS 2017 fall conference, pp 313–314

  7. LaValle SM (2006) Planning algorithms, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang Y, Jia Y, Du J, Zhang J (2015) Vector field guidance for three-dimensional curved path following with fixed-wing UAVs. In: Proceedings of the American control conference (ACC), pp 1187–1192 https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2015.7170894

  9. Lim S, Jung W, Bang H (2014) Vector field guidance for path following and arrival angle control. In: Proceedings of the international conference on unmanned aircraft systems (ICUAS), pp 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1109/icuas.2014.6842271

  10. Jung W, Lim S, Lee D, Bang H (2016) Unmanned aircraft vector field path following with arrival angle control. J Intell Robot Syst 84(1–4):311–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-016-0332-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Marina HG, Kapitanyuk YA, Bronz M, Hattenberger G, Cao M (2017) Guidance algorithm for smooth trajectory tracking of a fixed wing UAV flying in wind flows. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pp 5740–5745. https://doi.org/10.1109/icra.2017.7989674

  12. Holland JH (1992) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, 1st edn. MIT Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Man KF, Tang KS, Kwong S (1996) Genetic algorithms: concepts and applications. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 43(5):519–534. https://doi.org/10.1109/41.538609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung FHF, Lam HK, Ling SH, Tam PKS (2003) Tuning of the structure and parameters of a neural network using an improved genetic algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 14(1):79–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2002.804317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Oghim S, Lee C-Y, Leeghim H (2017) Minimum-energy spacecraft intercept on non-coplanar elliptical orbits using genetic algorithms. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 18(4):729–739. https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2017.18.4.729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng 82(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3662552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK (2004) Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. Proc IEEE 92(3):401–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.823141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Higgins WT (1975) A comparison of complementary and Kalman filtering. In: IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, vol AES-11(3), pp 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.1975.308081

  19. Mahony R, Hamel T, Pflimlin J-M (2005) Complementary filter design on the special orthogonal group SO(3). In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on decision and control, and the European control conference (CDC-ECC), 2005, pp 1477–1484. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2005.1582367

  20. Mahony R, Hamel T, Pflimlin J-M (2008) Nonlinear complementary filters on the special orthogonal group. IEEE Trans Autom Control 53(5):1203–1218. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2008.923738

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Blanchard RL (1971) A new algorithm for computing inertial altitude and vertical velocity. In: IEEE transactions on aerospace and electronic systems, vol AES-7(6), pp 1143–1146. https://doi.org/10.1109/taes.1971.310216

  22. Kim S-P, Yoo C-S, Salychev O-S, Kim E-T (2005) Development of altitude determination system by using GPS/INS/baroaltimeter. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 33(6):51–56. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2005.33.6.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee D, Shim DH (2017) Design and validation of low-cost flight control computer for multi-rotor UAVs. J Korean Soc Aeronaut Space Sci 45(5):401–408. https://doi.org/10.5139/JKSAS.2017.45.5.401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mokhtari A, Benallegue A, Daachi B (2005) Robust feedback linearization and controller for a quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp 1009–1014

  25. Benallegue A, Mokhtari A, Fridman L (2006) Feedback linearization and high order sliding mode observer for a quadrotor UAV. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on variable structure systems, pp 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1109/vss.2006.1644545

  26. Luenberger D (1966) Observers for multivariable systems. IEEE Trans Autom Control 11(2):190–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1966.1098323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee D, Lee H, Lee J, Shim DH (2017) Design, implementation, and flight tests of a feedback linearization controller for multirotor UAVs. Int J Aeronaut Space Sci 18(4):740–756. https://doi.org/10.5139/IJASS.2017.18.4.740

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Institute for Information & Communications Technology Promotion (IITP) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (no. R0126-17-1005, Development of High Reliable Communications and Security SW for Various Unmanned Vehicles).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dasol Lee.

Appendix

Appendix

To acquire the dynamics required for controller design, MATLAB® System Identification Toolbox™ was utilized to establish system identification. Since the roll and pitch axes are symmetric, we experimented for the pitch and yaw axes only; the results are shown in Table 4. Figures 18 and 19 show the results of system identification for the pitch and yaw axes, respectively. In both figures, the blue and red lines in the upper graph represent the data measured and estimated by the established dynamics, and the lower graph corresponds to the input data.

Table 4 Summary of the system identification results
Fig. 18
figure 18

System identification results for pitch axis

Fig. 19
figure 19

System identification results for yaw axis

The pitch and yaw axes dynamics are a second- and first-order system, respectively, and the fit values for the pitch and yaw axes are 70.8 and 82.3, respectively. These values are calculated using the function, ‘goodnessOfFit’, which is a MATLAB internal function.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D., Shim, D.H. A Mini-drone Development, Genetic Vector Field-Based Multi-agent Path Planning, and Flight Tests. Int. J. Aeronaut. Space Sci. 19, 785–797 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0052-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42405-018-0052-0

Keywords

Navigation