Skip to main content
Log in

An Innovative Methodology of Product Design from Nature

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nature is an information sourcebook of behaviour, function, colour and shape which can inspire visual design and invention. Studying the form and functional characteristics of a natural object can provide inspiration for product design and help to improve the marketability of manufactured products. The inspiration can be triggered either by direct observation or captured by three-dimensional (3D) digitising techniques to obtain superficial information (geometry and colour). An art designer often creates a concept in the form of a two-dimensional (2D) sketch while engineering methods lead to a point cloud in 3D. Each has its limitations in that the art designer commonly lacks the knowledge to build a final product from a 2D sketch and the engineering designer’s 3D point clouds may not be very beautiful. We propose a method for Product Design from Nature (PDN), coupling aesthetic intent and geometrical characteristics, exploring the interactions between designers and nature’s systems in PDN. We believe that this approach would considerably reduce the lead time and cost of product design from nature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cross N. Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley, New York, USA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Archer L B. Systematic method for designers. In: Jones J C, Thornley D G (eds), Conference on Design Methods, Pergamon, Oxford, UK, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edmonds E, Soufi B. The computational modeling of emergent shapes in design. In: Gero J S, Sudweeks F (eds), Computational Models of Creative Design, University of Sydney, Australia, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vincent J F V. Stealing ideas from nature. In: Pellegrino S (ed). Deployable Structures, Springer, Vienna, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tong J, Guo Z J, Ren L Q, Chen B C. Curvature features of three soil-burrowing animal claws and their potential applications in soil-engaging components. International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 2003, 12 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang S J, Hapeshi K, Bhattacharya A K. 3D modelling of biological systems for biomimetics. Journal of Bionics Engineering, 2004, 1 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ren L Q, Tong J, Zhang S J. Reducing sliding resistance of soil against bulldozing plates by unsmoothed bionics surfaces. Journal of Terramechanics, 1995, 32 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang S J, Howard D, Sanger D J, Miao S. Multi-legged walking machine body designs. Robotica, 1998, 16 593–598.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Raja V, Zhang S J, Garside J, Ryall C, Wimpenny D. Rapid and cost-effective design and manufacturing of high-integrity aerospace components. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 27 759–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Archer L B. Systematic method for designers. Cross N (ed), Developments in Design Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brazil R. Graphicacy and art education. Studies in Design Education and Craft, 1975, 8 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Boardman D. Graphicacy through landscape models. Studies of Design Craft and Technology, 1982, 14 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Purcell A T, Gero J S. Drawing and the design process. Design Studies, 1998, 19 389–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arnheim R. Visual Thinking, University of California Press, Berkeley, London, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cross N, Dorst K, Roozenburg N. Research in Design Thinking, Delft University Press, Netherlands, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer K. Translucent patches-dissolving windows. Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Marina del Rey, USA, 1994, 121–130.

  17. Landay J A, Myers B A. Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, USA, 1995, 43–50.

  18. Schön D A, Wiggins G. Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies, 1992, 13 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Goldschmidt G. On visual design thinking: Viz kids of architecture. Design Studies, 1994, 15 158–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kavakli M, Suwa M, Gero J S, Purcellm T. Sketching interpretation in novice and expert designers, In: Gero J S, Tversky B (eds). Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, University of Sydney, Sydney, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Colani Luigi. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia, [2008-3-8], http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luigi_Colani

  22. Fiell C, Fiell P. 1000 Lights, vol 1, Taschen, London, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tversky B. What does drawing reveal about thinking? In: Gero J S, Tversky B (eds). Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design, University of Sydney, Sydney, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Archer L B. Drawing as a tool for designers. Proceedings of the Future of Drawing in Design Conference, Huddersfield University, UK, 1997, 39–42.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wallschlaeger C, Busic-Snyder C. Basic Visual Concepts and Principles for Artists, Architects, and Designer, Brown and Benchmark Publishers, Dubuque, USA, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Linda R. Graphic Design Solutions, Delmar, New York, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jenkins D L, Martin R R. The importance of free hand sketching in conceptual design: Automatic sketch input. ASME Conference on Design Theory and Methodology (DTW’93), 1993, 53 115–128.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carroll N. Non-perceptual aesthetic properties: Comments for James Shelley. British Journal of Aesthetics, 2004, 44 413–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ulrich K T, Eppinger S D. Product Design and Development, McGraw-hill Inc, Columbus, USA, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Huntley H E. Divine Proportion: A Study in Mathematical Beauty, Dover, New York, 1970.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Lalo C. L’esthetique Experimentale Contemporaine, Alcan, Paris, France, 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Fechner G T. Various attempts to establish a basic form of beauty: Experimental aesthetics, golden section and square. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 1997, 15 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu-jun Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wen, HI., Zhang, Sj., Hapeshi, K. et al. An Innovative Methodology of Product Design from Nature. J Bionic Eng 5, 75–84 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60009-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60009-8

Keywords

Navigation