Skip to main content
Log in

Lagrangian coherent structures in tandem flapping wing hovering

  • Published:
Journal of Bionic Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lagrangian Coherent Structures (LCS) of tandem wings hovering in an inclined stroke plane is studied using Immersed-Boundary Method (IBM) by solving two dimensional (2D) incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Coherent structures responsible for the force variation are visualized by calculating Finite Time Lyapunov Exponents (FTLE), and vorticity contours. LCS is effective in determining the vortex boundaries, flow separation, and the wing-vortex interactions accurately. The effects of inter-wing distance and phase difference on the force generation are studied. Results show that in-phase stroking generates maximum vertical force and counter-stroking generates the least vertical force. In-phase stroking generates a wake with swirl, and counter stroking generates a wake with predominant vertical velocity. Counter stroking aids the stability of the body in hovering. As the hindwing operates in the wake of the forewing, due to the reduction in the effective Angle of Attack (AoA), the hindwing generates lesser force than that of a single flapping wing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ellington C P, van den Berg C, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight. Nature, 1996, 384, 626–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shyy W, Liu H. Flapping wings and aerodynamic lift: The role of leading-edge vortices. AIAA Journal, 2007, 45, 2817–2819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeong J, Hussain F. On the identification of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1995, 285, 69–94.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Green M A, Rowley C W, Smits A J. Using hyperbolic La-grangian coherent structures to investigate vortices in bio-inspired fluid flows. Chaos, 2010, 20, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haller G, Yuan G. Lagrangian coherent structures and mixing in two-dimensional turbulence. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2000, 147, 352–370.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Peacock T, Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures: The hidden skeleton of fluid flows. Physics Today, 2013, 66, 41–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haller G. Lagrangian coherent structures from approximate velocity data. Physics of Fluids, 2002, 14, 1851–1861.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Shadden S C, Lekien F, Marsden J E. Definition and properties of Lagrangian coherent structures from finite-time Lyapunov exponents in two-dimensional aperiodic flows. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 2005, 212, 271–304.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Haller G. An objective definition of a vortex. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 2005, 525, 1–26.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Eldredge J D, Chong K. Fluid transport and coherent struc-tures of translating and flapping wings. Chaos, 2010, 20, 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng J, Dabiri J O. An overview of a Lagrangian method for analysis of animal wake dynamics. The Journal of experimental biology, 2008, 211, 280–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brunton S L, Rowley C W. Modeling the unsteady aerodynamic forces on small-scale wings. AIAA Paper, 2009, 2009-1127, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wan H, Dong H, Beran P. Wake coherent structure of hovering flapping wings. 28th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, 2010, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang A, Jia L, Yin X. Experimental study of a starting vortex ring generated by a thin circular disk. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2010, 7, S103–S108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosti M E, Omidyeganeh M, Pinelli A. Direct numerical simulation of the flow around an aerofoil in ramp-up motion. Physics of Fluids, 2016, 28, 025106.

  16. Lan S L, Sun M. Aerodynamic properties of a wing per-forming unsteady rotational motions at low Reynolds number. Acta Mechanica, 2001, 149, 135–147.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Wang Z J, Russell D. Effect of forewing and hindwing in-teractions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Physical Review Letters, 2007, 99, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shen C, Sun M. Power requirements of vertical flight in the dronefly. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2015, 12, 227–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Usherwood J R, Lehmann F O. Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 2008, 5, 1303–1307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xiang J, Du J, Li D, Liu K. Aerodynamic performance of the locust wing in gliding mode at low Reynolds number. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Broering T M, Lian Y S. The effect of phase angle and wing spacing on tandem flapping wings. Acta Mechanica Sinica/Lixue Xuebao, 2012, 28, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Broering T M, Lian Y. Numerical study of tandem flapping wing aerodynamics in both two and three dimensions. Computers and Fluids, 2015, 115, 124–139.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Taira K, Colonius T. The immersed boundary method: A projection approach. Journal of Computational Physics, 2007, 225, 2118–2137.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang Z J. The role of drag in insect hovering. Journal of Experimental Biology, 2004, 207, 4147–4155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao T, Lu X Y. Insect normal hovering flight in ground effect. Physics of Fluids, 2008, 20, 087101.

  26. Xu S, Wang Z J. An immersed interface method for simulating the interaction of a fluid with moving boundaries. Journal of Computational Physics, 2006, 216, 454–493.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Childs H, Brugger E, Whitlock B, Meredith J, Ahern S, Pugmire D, Biagas K, Miller M, Harrison C, Weber G H, Krishnan H, Fogal T, Sanderson A, Garth C, Bethel E W, Durant M, Camp D, Favre J M, Rübel O, Navrátil P. Wheeler M, Selby P, Vivodtzev F. VisIt: An end-user tool for visualizing and analyzing very large data. In Bethel E W, Childs H (eds.), High Performance Visualization-Enabling Extreme-Scale Scientific Insight, Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, UK, 2012, 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meng X, Sun M. Wing kinematics, aerodynamic forces and vortex-wake structures in fruit-flies in forward flight. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2016, 13, 478–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sankaranarayanan Vengadesan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gadde, S.N., Vengadesan, S. Lagrangian coherent structures in tandem flapping wing hovering. J Bionic Eng 14, 307–316 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60399-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1672-6529(16)60399-2

Keyword

Navigation