Relative interfacial energies in FeC alloysEnergies relatives d'interfaces dans des alliages FeCRelative grenzflächenenergien in FeC legierungen
References (24)
- et al.
Acta Met.
(1958)et al.Acta Met.
(1959)et al.Acta Met.
(1959) - et al.
Acta Met.
(1960)et al.Acta Met.
(1960) - et al.
Nature, Lond.
(1961) - et al.
Trans. Am. Inst. Min. metall. Engrs
(1960) - et al.
Trans. Am. Inst. Min. metall. Engrs
(1948)J. Inst. Metals
(1957)- et al.
Can. Metall. Q.
(1963) - E. Eichen, R. Forgacs and B.A. Parifin, Ford Scientific Laboratory Rept. No. SL-65-38; Rev. Scient. Instrum. To be...
Proc. R. Soc.
(1965)
Acta Met.
Cited by (49)
Segregation engineering enables nanoscale martensite to austenite phase transformation at grain boundaries: A pathway to ductile martensite
2013, Acta MaterialiaCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, since the martensite–austenite interfaces in our current example are at least in one case crystallographically related through the K-S relationship [102–109] we assume that the energy of the newly formed austenite–martensite interface is equal to that of the eliminated martensite–martensite grain boundary. This is in accordance with the work of Gjostein et al. [95], who experimentally observed that the bcc/fcc interfacial energy ratio for Fe–C alloys is approximately 1. Hence, we assume a lower bound estimate of the nucleation barrier values of 1.3 J m−2 for both the martensite–martensite and the austenite–martensite interfaces and a lower-bound estimate of 0.2 J m−2 for both interfaces (martensite–martensite lath boundary and K-S martensite–austenite interface).
Variant selection of bainite on the surface of allotriomorphic ferrite in a low carbon steel
2012, Materials CharacterizationStructure, energy and migration of phase boundaries in steels
2012, Phase Transformations in Steels