Elsevier

Cognitive Psychology

Volume 13, Issue 2, April 1981, Pages 248-277
Cognitive Psychology

The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information

https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(81)90010-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In a series of studies, subjects were asked to make predictions about target individuals. Some subjects were given information about the target which pretest subjects had judged to be “diagnostic”—that is, had judged to be usefully predictive of the outcome. Other subjects were given a mix of information judged to be diagnostic and information judged to be “nondiagnostic” by pretest subjects—that is, judged to be of little value for predicting the outcome. Subjects given mixed information made much less extreme predictions than did subjects given only diagnostic information. It was argued that this “dilution effect” occurs because people make predictions by making simple similarity judgments. That is, they compare the information they have about the target with their conception of outcome categories. The presence of individuating but nondiagnostic information about the target reduces the similarity between the target and those outcomes that are suggested by the diagnostic information. One of the major implications is that stereotypes and other “social knowledge structures” may be applied primarily to abstract, undifferentiated individuals and groups and may be largely set aside when judgments are made about concrete, individuated people.

References (16)

  • D. Kahneman et al.

    Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness

    Cognitive Psychology

    (1972)
  • N. Anderson

    A simple model for information integration

  • H. Arendt
  • E. Borgida et al.

    Social stereotypes and social judgment

  • N. Cantor et al.

    Categorization processes in the perception of people

  • R.M. Dawes et al.

    Linear models in decision making

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1974)
  • E. Goffman
  • L.R. Goldberg

    Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments

    American Psychologist

    (1968)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (372)

  • Behavioral Economics in Radiology Training: Overcoming Irrational Behavior

    2023, Journal of the American College of Radiology
View all citing articles on Scopus

The research reported here was supported by Grants BNS 75-23191 and BNS-7914094 from the National Science Foundation.

View full text