Elsevier

Engineering Geology

Volume 5, Issue 3, October 1971, Pages 173-225
Engineering Geology

Measurement of tensile strength by diametral compression of discs and annuli

https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-7952(71)90001-9Get rights and content

Abstract

In the first part of the paper, the validity of diametral compression tests for indirect measurement of tensile strength is investigated theoretically and experimentally. Linear elastic theory for diametral compression of discs and annuli by opposed strip loads is reviewed, and the significance of failure criteria in fracture initiation and test interpretation is considered. Results of careful tests are given for three types of rock, two plastics, glass, and ice, and the experimental results are compared with theoretical expectations. Close consideration of the conflicts between theory and experiment leads to the conclusion that, while there are very serious objections to the ring test, the Brazil test is capable of giving a good measure of uniaxial tensile strength for Griffith-type materials. In the second part of the paper, practical problems involved in diametral compression testing are considered in some detail. Special attention is given to contact stresses under the applied loads, and a design is given for a loading jig that reduces contact stresses. Specimen dimensions, size effects, loading rate, force readout, and specimen preparation are discussed, and some recommended practical procedures for Brazil tests are outlined.

References (33)

  • ButkovitchT.R.

    Some physical properties of ice from the TUTO tunnel and ramp, Thule, Greenland

    U.S.A. SIPRE, Res. Rept.

    (1959)
  • ColbackP.S.B.

    An analysis of brittle fracture initiation and propagation in the Brazilian test

  • FilonL.N.G.

    The stresses in a circular ring

    Inst. Civil Engrs., Selected Papers

    (1924)
  • FrankensteinG.E.

    Strength data on lake ice

    U.S.A. SIPRE, Corps Engrs., Tech. Rept.

    (1959)
  • GariepyS. et al.

    Stress-strain relations for rocks in uniaxial tension

    (1971)
  • GreenS.J. et al.
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text