Elsevier

Experimental Neurology

Volume 93, Issue 2, August 1986, Pages 320-333
Experimental Neurology

Fatigue from high- and low-frequency muscle stimulation: Role of sarcolemma action potentials

https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4886(86)90193-7Get rights and content

Abstract

This study compared the effect of high- (75 Hz, 1 min) and low- (5 Hz, 1.5 min) frequency stimulation on sarcolemmal action potentials of rat phrenic nerve-diaphragm preparations, measured in vitro at 25°C. High-frequency stimulation reduced peak tetanic tension to 21 ± 1% (x ± SE) of initial, whereas 5 Hz stimulation produced less of a decline (71 ± 2% of initial). Despite an initial faster rate of force recovery after 75-Hz stimulation, tetanic tension was still significantly depressed at 0.25 and 1 min relative to the values after 5-Hz stimulation (P < 0.05). Resting membrane potential, and action potential overshoot and area were not significantly altered by fatigue. Action potential amplitude (AMP) was initially depressed by repetitive stimulation but increased significantly during recovery (P < 0.05). No significant difference occurred in AMP recovery between the high- vs. low-frequency stimulation groups. The rate of rise and fall of the action potential was reduced after fatiguing stimulation but increased significantly with time (P < 0.05). Moreover, the time to peak height of the action potential was prolonged by fatigue but significantly declined to resting values with time (P < 0.05). During recovery, fatigue from high-frequency stimulation was associated with a greater prolongation in duration and time to baseline of the action potential relative to low-frequency stimulation (P < 0.05). Action potential variables altered by stimulation generally recovered within 1 to 3 min, whereas peak tetanic tension did not completely return to resting values until 10 to 15 min of recovery. We conclude that high- and low-frequency stimulation elicits virtually identical perturbations in sarcolemmal action potentials, and thus changes in surface membrane properties cannot explain the decreased tetanic tension that follows 75-Hz stimulation. It appears that events distal to the sarcolemma are responsible for fatigue from both high- and low-frequency stimulation.

References (19)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (68)

  • Recovery of the first and second phases of the M wave after prolonged maximal voluntary contractions

    2020, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Because the first phase of an M wave essentially results from the propagation of action potentials along the fiber membrane (Rodriguez-Falces and Place, 2018), we propose that the parallel increase in AmpliFIRST and DurFIRST after the MVC was most likely due to fatigue-induced changes in fiber membrane properties. One membrane alteration capable of producing simultaneous increases in the amplitude and duration of an M wave is the lengthening of the individual transmembrane action potentials, secondary to the increase in extracellular K+ concentration after the MVC (Lüttgau, 1965, Metzger and Fitts, 1986). Indeed, a broadening of the transmembrane action potential leads to greater and wider (increased duration) extracellular potentials that would summate more effectively, thus resulting in larger and broader M waves (Dimitrova and Dimitrov, 2002; Arabadzhiev et al., 2008).

  • Factors affecting the turns analysis of the interference EMG signal

    2008, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
  • Differential changes in myoelectric characteristics of slow and fast fatigable frog muscle fibres during long-lasting activity

    2007, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The first step in the coupling between excitation and contraction (E–C) is the muscle fibre action potential. During repetitive stimulation, diminished membrane excitability predetermines: (i) a failure of E–C [10,13]; (ii) a decrease in amplitude and an increase in duration of the action potential [18,29,31]; (iii) a specific pattern of muscle fibre activity consisting of alternating periods of action potential failure and reappearance [30,35]. Alterations in single muscle fibre intracellular action potentials (ICAPs) and their derivatives reflect the changes in the ionic currents and ionic conductivity of the excitable membrane.

View all citing articles on Scopus
2

J.M.M. was the recipient of a Marquette University Fellowship.

1

We thank Barbara DeNoyer for her help in the preparation of this manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (S07RR 07196), and Marquette University Regular Research Grant 5617. R.H.F. was the recipient of a National Institutes of Health Career Development Award (AM 00810).

View full text