An ellipsometry study of ionic surfactant adsorption on chromium surfaces
References (41)
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1974)- et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1986) - et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1987) - et al.
J. Biol. Chem.
(1983) Surf. Sci.
(1987)- et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1982) - et al.
Chem. Phys. Lipids
(1972) - et al.
Colloids and Surfaces
(1981) - et al.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1971) J. Colloid Interface Sci.
(1977)
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
Chem. Phys. Lett.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Colloid Interface Sci.
J. Pharm. Sci.
Cited by (55)
Nanocomposite Co-nSiC coatings electrodeposited from cobalt-gluconate bath via pulse reverse plating technique with anionic surfactant
2023, Materials Chemistry and PhysicsA review on surfactant retention on rocks: mechanisms, measurements, and influencing factors
2021, FuelCitation Excerpt :These alterations are effected by the adsorbed layer on the reflecting surface [112]. Less than 1 cm2 surface area is required to determine the adsorption, and this technique allows in-situ measurement of the adsorption isotherm [112,113]. Adsorption isotherms are constructed by measuring the concentration of surfactant either in the supernatant liquid (floating liquid on the surface) from the static adsorption experiments or in the effluent liquid (discharged) from the dynamic adsorption experiment (core flooding) [10].
Neutron reflectometry of anionic surfactants on sapphire: A strong maximum in the adsorption near the critical micelle concentration
2016, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceCitation Excerpt :The use of a flat surface would greatly reduce the chance of such interference from the surface. Thus, Arnebrant et al. studied adsorption at a flat surface, using ellipsometry [6] and concluded that there was no maximum for hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (C16TAB) or sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS) at either the hydrophobically modified or the hydrophilic chromia–aqueous interface, although they had earlier observed a sharp maximum for SDS at the hydrophobically modified chromia surface. Just like the air–aqueous interface, a hydrophobic surface is highly vulnerable to the main impurity of SDS, i.e. dodecanol, and Arnebrant et al. showed that the maximum was completely removed by purification of the surfactant.
Adsorption of delmopinol at the solid/liquid interface - The role of the acid-base equilibrium
2010, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceChemical modification of chromium oxide surfaces using organosilanes
2009, Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceCitation Excerpt :Several groups have studied the formation of organic thin films on chromium surfaces using different modifying reagents. These include the assembly of the surfactants myristic acid [26] and dodecylsulfate [27], deposition of Langmuir–Blodgett films of phthalocyanines [28] and polyimides [29] and the adsorption of electroactive species containing isonitrile and thiol functional groups [30]. Reactions of octadecylsilane [16] and octadecyltriethoxysilane [31] with chromium oxide have been reported, however sparse data are provided and comparisons between these monolayers have not been made.
Approximate prediction of adhesion between two solids immersed in surfactant solution based on adsorption to an isolated solid
2008, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects