Do Walras' identity and continuity characterize the class of community excess demand functions?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0531(73)90066-5Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (12)

  • G Debreu

    Theory of Value

    (1959)
  • D. Gale, “A Note on the Global Instability of Competitive Equilibrium,” (multilithed), Department of Mathematics, Brown...
  • J.R Hicks

    A Revision of Demand Theory

    (1956)
  • J Quirk et al.

    Introduction to General Equilibrium Theory and Welfare Economics

    (1968)
  • T Rader

    Edgeworth Exchange and General Equilibrium

  • W Rudin

    Real and Complex Analysis

    (1966)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (321)

  • Discounted dynamic optimization and Bregman divergence

    2024, Journal of Mathematical Economics
  • Aggregate excess demand on wall street

    2021, Heliyon
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, without information on investor behaviors, it is implausible to tag price movements as consequences of rational or irrational behaviors, let alone predict future movements. Procurement of such information is theoretically formidable because the aggregate excess demand function, a gauge of market behaviors, may take arbitrary forms from the assumption of maximizing individual utilities, as proven by the Sonnenschein–Mantel–Debreu (SMD) theorem (Sonnenschein, 1973a; Mantel, 1974; Debreu, 1974). The Walrasian general equilibrium theory assumes that market equilibrium is established through “groping”, and would be constantly reestablished after being disturbed (Walras, 1900, p319).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text