Research paper
Monitoring moisture storage in trees using time domain reflectometry

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(90)90032-SGet rights and content

Abstract

Laboratory and field tests were performed to examine the feasibility of using time domain reflectometry (TDR) to monitor changes in the moisture storage of the woody parts of trees. To serve as wave guides for the TDR signal, pairs of stainless steel rods (13 cm long, 0.32 cm in diameter, and 2.5 cm separation) were driven into parallel pilot holes drilled into the woody parts of trees, and a cable testing oscilloscope was used to determine the apparent dielectric constant. A laboratory calibration test was performed on two sapwood samples, so that the relation between the volumetric water content and the apparent dielectric constant of the sapwood could be determined over a range of water contents. The resulting calibration curve for these sapwood samples was significantly different than the general calibration curve used for soils, showing a smaller change in the apparent dielectric constant for a given change in the volumetric water content than is typical for soils. The calibration curve was used to estimate the average volumetric water content to a depth of 13 cm in living trees. One field experiment was conducted on an English walnut tree (Juglans regia) with a diameter of 40 cm, growing in a flood-irrigated orchard on a Hanford sandy loam near Modesto, California (U.S.A.). Rods were driven into the tree at about 50 cm above the soil surface and monitored hourly for the month of August, 1988. The moisture content determined by TDR showed a gradual decrease from 0.44 to 0.42 cm3 cm−3 over a two week period prior to flood irrigation, followed by a rapid rise to 0.47 cm3 cm−3 over a four day period after irrigation, then again a gradual decline approaching the next irrigation. A second field experiment was made on ten evergreen and deciduous trees with diameters ranging from 30 to 120 cm, growing in the foothills of the Coast Range of central California. Rods were driven into each tree at 50 to 100 cm above the soil surface and monitored on a biweekly to monthly basis for over a year. Most trees showed an early spring maximum in moisture content determined by TDR associated with leaf growth, and a late summer minimum in moisture content associated with the end of the dry season. Moisture contents ranged from 0.20 to 0.70 cm3 cm−3, with an annual percentage change in moisture of 15% to 70% depending on species and environmental conditions. A final field test was performed in northern New Mexico (U.S.A.) to examine the effect of trunk freezing on TDR measurements. This test confirmed that freezing conditions were recorded as a total loss of liquid water by the TDR method. These results suggest that further TDR calibration for wood, plus some understanding of the relation between tree moisture and physiological stress could be useful to several disciplines, ranging from irrigation scheduling to watershed management to forest ecology.

References (17)

  • F.H. Braekke et al.

    Shrinkage and swelling of stems of Pinus resinosa and Betula papyrifera in northern Wisconsin

    Plant Soil

    (1975)
  • J. Clark et al.

    Studies in tree physiology. IV. Further investigations of seasonal changes in moisture content of certain Canadian forest trees

    Can. J. Bot.

    (1957)
  • J.L. Davis

    Relative permittivity measurements of a sand and clay soil in situ

    Geol. Surv. Can., Ottawa, Pap.

    (1975)
  • J.M. Fielding

    The moisture content of the trunks of Monterey pine trees

    Aust. For.

    (1952)
  • H. Hinsch et al.

    A combined device for measuring density and water content in living tree trunks

    Atompraxis

    (1964)
  • T.T. Kozlowski

    Tree Growth and Environmental Stresses

    (1979)
  • P.J. Kramer

    Water Relations of Plants

    (1983)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (82)

  • Deciduous Shrub Stem Water Content in Arctic Alaska

    2022, Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    To understand the increasing role of shrubs in tundra water budgets, we applied a method of embedding stainless steel rods in shrub stems to continuously measure shrub stem water content using time-domain reflectometry (TDR). Time-domain reflectometry (TDR) has been used extensively over the last 35 years to measure soil water content and tree stem water content in both the lab and the field (Constantz and Murphy, 1990; Hernández‐Santana et al., 2008; Nadler et al., 2006; Sparks et al., 2001; Wullschleger et al., 1996). The technique benefits from minimal tree stem disturbance, accuracy and ease of automation.

  • Time and frequency domain reflectometry for the measurement of tree stem water content: A review, evaluation, and future perspectives

    2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Experimental evidence has shown that EM methods are capable of measuring θstem at different time scales and a range of values of tree water status. Constantz and Murphy (1990) pioneered the application of EM methods to monitor the daily and seasonal changes of θstem, while Wullschleger et al. (1996) proposed a generalized calibration equation to estimate θstem based on a large pool of data from measurements on four tree species and one tree from the Constantz and Murphy (1990) study. Since then, EM methods have been widely applied to measure θstem for different species from vines to shrubs to standing trees (Coskun and Konukcu, 2014; Salomón et al., 2020), in logs, lumber, woodchips and decayed wood (Amato et al., 2019; Gray and Spies, 1995; Schimleck et al., 2011; Tiitta and Olkkonen, 2002), at different positions in the tree, including roots, trunk, branches and canopy (Burke et al., 2005; Green and Clothier, 1995), and at different geographic locations from valleys to mountain tops and from tropical to temperate to Arctic environments (Clark et al., 2016; Fang, 2017; Green and Clothier, 1995; Young-Robertson et al., 2016).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text