Structure-borne sound transmission through plate junctions and estimates of sea coupling loss factors using the finite element method
References (21)
- et al.
Energy transmission in finite coupled plates, part I: theory
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1982) - et al.
Energy transmission in finite coupled plates, part II: application to an L-shaped structure
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1982) - et al.
Statistical energy analysis of strongly coupled systems
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1987) - et al.
Analytical solution for the power exchange between strongly coupled plates under random excitation: a test of statistical energy analysis concepts
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1988) - et al.
Coupling loss factors for statistical energy analysis of sound transmission at rectangular structural slab joints, part I
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1981) - et al.
The use of power flow methods for the assessment of sound transmission in building structures
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1976) - et al.
Sound transmission and mode coupling at junctions of thin plates, part I: representation of the problem
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1981) - et al.
Sound transmission and mode coupling at junctions of thin plates, part II: parametric survey
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1981) - et al.
In situ determination of loss and coupling loss factors by the power injection method
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1980) - et al.
On the measurement of the coupling loss factor of structural connections
Journal of Sound and Vibration
(1984)
Cited by (76)
A hybrid deterministic-diffuse approach to the analysis of vibration transmission across finite junctions
2023, Journal of Sound and VibrationAnalysis of the forced response of coupled panels using a hybrid finite element/wave and finite element method
2022, Journal of Sound and VibrationCitation Excerpt :However, SEA involves a number of assumptions and approximations which may or may not be accurate, such as there being diffuse, reverberant wave fields in each subsystem, weak coupling between subsystems and so on [6]. The reliability and accuracy of SEA predictions also depend on the accuracy of estimated parameters such as modal densities and coupling loss factors [4]. Park et al. [7], for example, proposed using an “effective” coupling loss factor in an SEA model for estimating the energy transmission between semi-infinite plates and finite plates instead of using coupling loss factors of coupled infinite panels which do not take account of detailed structural modal behaviour.
Estimation of the coupling loss factors of structural junctions with in-plane waves by means of the inverse statistical energy analysis problem
2021, Journal of Sound and VibrationCitation Excerpt :In general, the CLF must be obtained by means of direct measurements or complex simulation models that can account for the detail of the connection. For the case of structural junctions, the most common techniques are: wave-based models [5–9], direct measurement in an in-situ or laboratory experiment (Experimental SEA, ESEA [10–16]), estimation of the CLF from numerical simulations based on the Finite Element Method (FEM, Virtual SEA) or equivalent techniques [17–19]. In addition to the simulation models for junctions some formulas are available, see for example [6,20,21].
A dual modal formulation for multiple flexural subsystems connected at a junction in energy-based models
2019, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingA hybrid boundary element-statistical energy analysis for the mid-frequency vibration of vibro-acoustic systems
2018, Computers and Structures