Dynamic income taxation, redistribution, and the ratchet effect

https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01491-4Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we extend the classic optimum linear income tax model to a twice repeated game. A utilitarian policy-maker decides on the second-period tax system on the basis of observed first-period behaviour. We summarise our findings as follows. First, the static optimal linear tax results cannot be expected to hold in a dynamic setting. Second, more productive households are likely to mimic the behaviour of less productive households. Third, the optimal dynamic first-period tax rate might be negative; then income is redistributed from low- to high-income households. Fourth, if the utility function is well-behaved, then the optimal dynamic first-period tax rate is lower than the optimal static tax rate. Fifth, if the optimal static tax rate separates, then the dynamic and the static optimal tax rates coincide. Sixth, if a zero tax rate separates, then the optimal dynamic tax rate is positive.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (20)

  • Adverse selection, commitment and exhaustible resource taxation

    2020, Resource and Energy Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    For instance, in the Turkish Petroleum Code, Article 65, specifies that a license is to be granted for twenty years with a possibility of two extensions for no more than ten years each if certain conditions have been met.2 The inability to commit to long-term contracts has major effects on optimal taxation schemes (Farhi et al., 2012; Brito et al., 1991 or Dillen and Lundholm, 1996) especially with private information. Indeed, without commitment, if a regulated firm has private information, the regulator updates its belief at the end of each contract.

  • Union strategy and optimal direct taxation

    2006, Journal of Public Economics
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text