Autoregressive modeling and causal ordering of economic variables

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(82)90015-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A multivariate generalization of the Wiener-Granger notion of causality is suggested. Propositions about population properties of various causal events are derived. These propositions may be used to interpret the statistical results as well as to check the empirical implications of various model variants and in ruling out a number of variants as being inconsistent with prior theories.

References (36)

  • P.E. Caines et al.

    Feedback between stationary stochastic process

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (1975)
  • T.J. Courchene

    Money, inflation, and the Bank of Canada: An analysis of Canadian monetary policy from 1970 to early 1975

    (1977)
  • R. Engle

    Testing price equations for stability across spectral frequency bands

    Econometrica

    (1978)
  • H. Feigl

    Notes on causality

  • J. Geweke

    Testing the exogeneity specification in the complete dynamic simultaneous equation model

    Journal of Econometrics

    (1978)
  • J. Geweke

    Inference and causality in economic time series models

  • C.W.J. Granger

    Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods

    Econometrica

    (1969)
  • C.W.J. Granger

    Testing for causality: A personal view

    Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control

    (1980)
  • Cited by (0)

    This paper is a revised and condensed version of the paper entitled ‘Time Series Modelling and Causal Ordering of Canadian Money, Income, and Interest Rate’, which was presented in the Fourth International Time Series Meetings in Valencia, Spain, June 1981. This work was completed while the author was visiting Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ. Research is supported in part by National Science Foundation Grant SES80-07576 at the Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Stanford University, and by Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada Grant 410-80-0080 at the Institute for Policy Analysis, University of Toronto. I am indebted to C.W. Keng and K.Y. Tsui for computational assistance. I also wish to thank the referees and T. Amemiya, T.W. Anderson, V. Bencivenga, J.D. Bossons, J. Carr and G. Chow for helpful comments.

    View full text