Criteria importance theory
References (28)
- et al.
Goal programming and multiple objective optimization
Europ. J. Op. Res.
(1977) - et al.
Deriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approach
Europ. J. Op. Res.
(1988) The setting of weights in linear goal-programming problems
Computers Op. Res.
(1987)- et al.
Construction of preference relation and core in multicriterial problems with non-homogeneous importance-ordered criteria
USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys.
(1988) - et al.
On non-contradictory extension of preference relations in decision-making problems
USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys.
(1984) Multicriterial problems with uniform equivalent criteria
USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys.
(1975)Allocation of importance: Axiom system
J. Math. Psychol.
(1972)- et al.
A Method for determining the weights of criteria: The centralized weights
Europ. J. Op. Res.
(1986) - et al.
Interval value tradeoffs: Theory, methods, software, and applications
- et al.
Introduction to Operations Research
(1957)
Weighting multiple criteria
Management Sci.
A balance model for evaluating systems of multiattributed items
Management Sci.
Lexicographic orders, utilities, and decision rules: A survey
Management Sci.
An axiomatic system of multidimensional preferences
Theory and Decision
Cited by (55)
What is a decision problem?
2024, European Journal of Operational ResearchSustainable tourism evaluation using a composite indicator with different compensatory levels
2022, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewEvaluating the economic and environmental efficiency of ports: Evidence from Italy
2020, Journal of Cleaner ProductionAn Operational Non-compensatory Composite Indicator: Measuring Sustainable Tourism in Andalusian Urban Destinations
2019, Ecological EconomicsCitation Excerpt :In this way, the composite indicator shows the net result which is obtained when bearing in mind the compensations that are produced between the indicators present in the system. In this context, a search for new procedures to obtain synthetic indicators which do not have a compensatory character has been proposed (Podinovskii, 1994). Note that this discussion about compensation only refers to the procedure based on linear aggregation.
Hierarchical Criterion Approach for Architecture Structure Selection of Transportation Software
2017, Procedia EngineeringResearch productivity in management schools of India during 1968-2015: A directional benefit-of-doubt model analysis
2017, Omega (United Kingdom)Citation Excerpt :Therefore, we adjudged the ratings based on the arbitrary weight restrictions principle as unacceptable. Moreover, as Podinovski [104] also pointed out, the BOD model imposes the compensatory preference relation among individual indicators without actually verifying whether this relation actually exists in the data. Given the objectivity in the directional-BOD model (8), we saw three more merits in our analyses.
- 1
Presently at: Rostovskaya nab. 3–14, Moscow 119121, Russian Federation.