Location distortions under incomplete information

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02048-8Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper we consider spatial competition between two firms which first choose sequentially their locations and then compete in prices, when there is incomplete information of the second mover firm about the first mover firm's cost advantage. We completely characterize the pure strategy equilibria and we show how the equilibrium locations differ from the complete information locations, i.e. how incomplete information affects product differentiation. The natural bound created by space constraints on differentiation implies that Kreps' intuitive criterion does not necessarily select the separating equilibrium as in a classical signaling model.

References (15)

  • S.P. Anderson

    Spatial competition and price leadership

    International Journal of Industrial Organization

    (1987)
  • A.P. Hurter et al.

    Spatial duopoly with discriminatory pricing

    Regional Science and Urban Economics

    (1985)
  • C. D'Aspremont et al.

    On Hotelling stability in competition

    Econometrica

    (1979)
  • H. Bester et al.

    The missing equilibria in Hotelling's location game

  • M. Boyer et al.

    Sequential Location equilibria under incomplete information

    Economic Theory

    (1994)
  • I.-K. Cho et al.

    Signaling games and stable equilibria

    Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (1987)
  • D. Fudenberg et al.

    Game theory

    (1991)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (17)

  • Endogenous location leadership

    2009, International Journal of Industrial Organization
    Citation Excerpt :

    This also, may make moving first more valuable and change the structure of the game of timing. Another possible interesting extension of the above would be to examine the timing of the game along the lines of Boyer et al. (1994), that is, under incomplete information. With incomplete information it may be possible that each firm thinks it is the high cost firm and refuses to enter until after the other firm which may lead to an equilibrium where neither firm enters, i.e., the timing of entry would signal what firms believe are their relative costs.

  • Entry preventing locations under incomplete information

    2003, International Journal of Industrial Organization
  • A symmetric information and product differentiation

    2003, Regional Science and Urban Economics
    Citation Excerpt :

    We know from Boyer et al. (1994, 1995) that it is not true.

  • Perception and information in a competitive location model

    1998, European Journal of Operational Research
  • Strategic entry deterrence through spatial price discrimination

    1998, Regional Science and Urban Economics
View all citing articles on Scopus

We wish to thank participants in seminars at GREQE (Marseille), Université de Montréal, UBC, Groupe HEC (Paris) and in the Location Theory session of the World Congress of the Econometric Society (Barcelona) for their comments. Comments by two anonymous referees and by K. Stahl were also quite helpful in improving the paper. Financial support from FCAR, SSHRC and CNRS is gratefully acknowledged.

View full text