Elsevier

Technovation

Volume 16, Issue 8, August 1996, Pages 397-409, 445-446
Technovation

The balancing of empowerment. A strategic resource based model of organizing innovation activities in service and low-tech firms

https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(96)00029-6Get rights and content

Abstract

The empowerment of employees as corporate entrepreneurs in the innovation process is important. However, it is also important to control, and thus balance, it. This article tries to answer two questions: Do firms stimulate and balance innovation empowerment, and, if so, how do they organize and manage it?

First, innovation empowerment is discussed theoretically within the framework of the resource based theory of the firm. Firms might establish two systems of organizing innovation activities. One is the expert system (typically R&D departments), the other is the empowerment system. The empowerment system is particularly important for low-tech and service firms. The empowerment system is organized corporate entrepreneurship which is controlled by the management—in contrast to free (uncontrolled) corporate entrepreneurship. The argument for controlling empowerment is that it may easily use too many resources.

Second, the two questions are discussed empirically on the basis of case studies in Danish firms. Nearly all firms practised empowerment stimulation. A fewer, but still most, practised empowerment control. Inducement mechanisms which stimulate the empowerment and control mechanisms were found. Strategy, particular innovation departments and practical instruments for procuring ideas were the most important inducement mechanisms. Networking and empowerment of customers were under-utilized mechanisms. The most important control mechanisms were the strategy and a linear organization of the innovation process.

Organizational learning is the most efficient control mechanism, but is difficult to practise. A model of the balance system is put forward.

References (53)

  • J. Sundbo

    Modulization of service production

    Scandinavian Journal of Management

    (1994)
  • W.J. Abernathy et al.

    Patterns of industrial innovations

    Technological Review

    (1978)
  • H.E. Aldrich

    Organizations and Environments

    (1979)
  • E.S. Andersen

    Evolutionary Economics—Post-Schumpeterian Contributions

    (1994)
  • C. Argyris et al.

    Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective

    (1978)
  • W.J. Baumol

    Entrepreneurship in economic theory

    American Economic Review

    (1968)
  • M. Binks et al.

    Entrepreneurship and Economic Change

    (1990)
  • R.A. Burgelman et al.

    Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure and Managerial Skills

    (1986)
  • T. Burns et al.

    The Management of Innovation

    (1961)
  • M. Casson

    The Entrepreneur

    (1982)
  • P. Drucker

    Innovation and Entrepreneurship

    (1985)
  • P. Eiglier et al.

    Servuction

    (1988)
  • A. Giddens

    Social Theory and Modern Sociology

    (1987)
  • B.G. Glaser et al.

    The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research

    (1970)
  • C. Grönroos

    Service Management and Marketing: Managing the Moments of Truth in Service Competition

    (1990)
  • Hippel E. von

    The Sources of Innovation

    (1988)
  • R.M. Kanter

    The Change Masters

    (1983)
  • E.R. Kanter

    When the Giants Learn to Dance

    (1989)
  • I. Kirzner

    Competition and Entrepreneurship

    (1973)
  • S. Kline

    Innovation is not a linear process

    Research Management

    (1985)
  • D. Knights et al.

    Strategic discourse and subjectivity: towards a critical analysis of corporate strategy in organizations

    Organization Studies

    (1991)
  • H. Leibenstein

    Allocative efficiency v. “x-efficiency”

    American Economic Review

    (1966)
  • B.-Å. Lundvall

    Innovation as an interactive process: from user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation

  • H. Mintzberg

    Mintzberg on Management

    (1989)
  • R. Nelson et al.

    An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change

    (1982)
  • Cited by (93)

    • Innovation Initiatives in Large Software Companies: A Systematic Mapping Study

      2018, Information and Software Technology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Free initiative is bottom-up approach and consisting of a series of un-organised activities. Employees come up with their own innovative ideas and try to convince management for approval [94]. When the ideas are rejected by management, employee has choice to continue working in bootlegging activities, leave company or create a spin-off.

    • Organizations as biomes of entrepreneurial life: Towards a clarification of the corporate entrepreneurship process

      2017, Journal of Business Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since the publication of Burgelman's (1983) article, other researchers have recognized the relevance of this type of behavior for innovation. Sundbo (1996) uses the terminology ‘free entrepreneurship’ to refer to situations where employees struggle to realize their own ideas without being stimulated by management. Kuratko and colleagues (2005) state that this form of entrepreneurial behavior consists in actions taken by an organization's members that relate to the discovery, evaluation, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities.

    • Intrapreneurship in services

      2023, Elgar Encyclopedia of Services
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text