Truckstop electrification: Reducing CO2 emissions from mobile sources while they are stationary

https://doi.org/10.1016/0196-8904(95)00271-5Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (7)

  • Braswell Robert

    Telephone conversation with Cassandra Hennequin

    (25 July 1995)
  • R. Cline William

    The Economics of Global Warming

    (1992)
  • M. El-Sharif Wael

    Truck Stop Electrification: Preliminary Concept Outline

    (1995)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (12)

  • Hierarchical optimization of green routing for mobile advertisement vehicle

    2020, Journal of Cleaner Production
    Citation Excerpt :

    As the percentage of carbon emission is directly proportional to the fuel consumed, idling emission estimation should also be taken into account in calculating emission from vehicles. Brodrick et al., 2002 and Berg, 1996 have studied the impact of idling and engine tends to consume more fuel while idling. MAVRP addresses a special kind of vehicle.

  • An updated methodology to analyse the idling of agricultural tractors

    2019, Biosystems Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    Indeed, an idling engine is inefficient since its fuel efficiency drops from 30% of normal operating conditions to 11% (Brodrick, Dwyer, Farshchi, Harris, & King, 2002) thereby wasting fuel and emitting increased levels of green-house gases. A study in the USA reported that idling of trucks is responsible for a waste between 3 and 8 billion of litres of fuel with the emission of 38 million of tonnes of CO2 (Van den Berg, 1996). Fuel consumption during idling is dependent on engine size but it is also controlled by the demands of auxiliaries.

  • A review on idling reduction strategies to improve fuel economy and reduce exhaust emissions of transport vehicles

    2014, Energy Conversion and Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Then, APU has been found to produce 36–85% reduction in fuel consumption [7,12,16,57,126]. In addition, after DFH, SP and APU, truck stop electrification showed better performance than other remaining options [7,12,72,125,127]. Rest of the other options are not frequently used for idle reduction due to their poor performances in reducing fuel consumption.

  • Impact of idling on fuel consumption and exhaust emissions and available idle-reduction technologies for diesel vehicles - A review

    2013, Energy Conversion and Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the study of Calcagno et al. [113], emission reduction by the use of TSE was studied. In the study of Van den Berg [18], emission reduction by the use of TSE was reported. Noise, additional maintenance, and deterioration of the engine are the major disadvantages of APUs.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text