Transfer of knowledge and the information processing professions

https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-2373(96)00025-4Get rights and content

Abstract

How is Knowledge best transferred? Via Information or via Tradition (face-to-face socialization)? This Article draws upon Michael Polanyi's concepts of ‘Tacit Knowing’ and ‘Tradition’, contrasting it with Information Theory to explore the two methods. The present growth in information seems to be a supply push, not a customer demand, which is potentially dangerous.

On today's information markets the suppliers pay - not the consumers, suggesting that the value of information in transferring knowledge is very small. The value can even be negative, because the reader does not know until after the reading, whether the information was worth spending time on or not. The money makers have the information suppliers as customers or have created standards that force the readers to use their tools.

It seems false - and possibly unprofitable - to base transfer of human knowledge on information. I suggest that those carrying a ‘radical’ definition of information as being equal and meaningless are less likely to be disappointed and less likely to lose money on information markets.

Human knowledge is action oriented and is best transferred via tradition, in social interaction with people, because humans have a huge capacity to absorb signals unconsciously in face-to-face communication. However, tradition is slow and unconscious. We must find new ways and other interactive media other than information, for efficient knowledge transfer. One such ‘medium’ is the open plan office.

References (15)

  • V. Barabba et al.

    Hearing the Voice of the Market

    (1990)
  • Gibbons

    The New Production of Knowledge

    (1994)
  • K. Johannesson

    Polanyi och den tysta kunskapen

    Dialoger

    (1992)
  • Nonaka et al.

    The Knowledge Creating Company

    (1995)
  • M. Polanyi

    Personal Knowledge

    (1958)
  • M. Polanyi

    The Tacit Dimension

    (1967)
  • Quinn et al.

    Managing Professional Intellect

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (66)

  • How businesses should govern knowledge-intensive collaborations with universities: An empirical investigation of university professors

    2017, Industrial Marketing Management
    Citation Excerpt :

    Hence, learning is a one-way phenomenon, i.e. Actor A learns from Actor B. Learning means that “partners gain access to their partners' knowledge, assemble discrete pieces of knowledge, and subjectively process the knowledge” (Bouncken and Kraus, 2013, p.2063). These knowledge inflows are interpreted against the background of past knowledge, rules, routines, targets, traditions etc. (Paavola and Hakkarainen, 2005; Sveiby, 1996) allowing partly redundant but also novel uses from the external knowledge. Learning therefore provides great improvement potential regarding product development performance (Cousins et al., 2011).

  • Parallels in knowledge cycles

    2011, Computers in Human Behavior
    Citation Excerpt :

    Knowledge is transformed through the interaction of explicit and tacit forms (Polanyi, 1962). Therefore, firms need to redefine their strategies and functions within the context of harvesting the intangible value embedded within them (Blackler, 2002; Drucker, 1993; Guthrie, 2001; Mouritsen, Larsen, Bukh, & Johansen, 2001; Nonaka, 1991; Stovel & Bontis, 2002; Sveiby, 1996, 1997). After all, management capabilities, employee competencies, technical knowledge and tacit organizational routines, may turn out to be the main determinants of firm performance (Dess, Gupta, Hennart, & Hill, 1995; McEvily & Chakravarthy, 2002).

  • TM strategies: Panacea to KM Ills and challenges - a reference to COVID-19

    2022, Post-Pandemic Talent Management Models in Knowledge Organizations
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text