Elsevier

Energy Policy

Volume 11, Issue 2, June 1983, Pages 148-167
Energy Policy

Energy conservation in US buildings: Solving the high potential/low adoption paradox from a behavioural perspective☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(83)90027-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The US building sector can ‘produce’ 30–50% of its energy needs by more efficient use of energy, ie by conservation. The cost of such energy conservation is usually below that of imported oil or new electric generation capacity. Yet, paradoxically, consumer adoption of this type of ‘energy’ is quite low. This stems from energy analysis traditionally dominated by engineering and economic perspectives, and ignoring a critically relevant behavioural perspective. Unless all three perspectives are integrated, little can be expected in the way of speedy market penetration of energy conservation. In this article the engineering, economic and behavioural perspectives are discussed, and the importance of integration is emphasized. The framework for diffusion of innovations is shown to be useful in an understanding of how demand for energy conservation forms and spreads. Specific recommendations to speed the adoption of energy conservation are outlined.

References (13)

  • Yergin et al.

    The energy outlook: combining the options

    Harvard Business Review

    (January–February 1980)

    SERI Solar/Conservation Study

    (January–February 1980)
  • Kenneth Jacobs et al.

    Energy Conservation in Buildings: A Behavioural Perspective

    (1980)
  • Duane Elgin

    Voluntary simplicity and the unfolding of man

    Consciousness and Culture

    (1977)
  • Elihu Katz et al.

    Traditions of research on the diffusion of innovations

    American Sociological Review

    (1963)
  • Everett M. Rogers et al.

    Communication of Innovations

    (1971)
  • Ruth Johnson et al.

    Energy efficiency as a factor in real estate transactions

    (1981)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

☆

This paper was written during the author's Lady Davis Visiting Fellowship at The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, and before the change in the research mission of the Institute.

View full text
Copyright © 1983 Published by Elsevier Ltd.