Reliability of accident case histories concerning hazardous chemicals: An analysis of uncertainty and quality aspects

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3894(91)80059-WGet rights and content

Abstract

A recent analysis of accident case histories achieved from readily available accident lists, has exposed the fact that an accident may be described more than once in the literature. Important discrepancies were found between the various main (accepted) sources in the field of risk analysis and loss prevention. An analysis of the differences found, and an assessment of the quality of accident case histories is attempted. Initially the analysis is limited to the number of fatalities, because this information is easy to measure, often available and lends itself to easy statistical treatment. The number of fatalities can thus be used as an indicator for the variability of the information found in accident case history reporting. The analysis is based on 595 transportation accidents involving hazardous chemicals from road, rail and pipeline transportation modes. Thirty-nine of these accidents were found to have three characteristics in common: (1) they happened before 1980, (2) they resulted in fatalities, and (3) they were described by more than one source. These 39 accidents are used in the analysis of the reliability of the number of fatalities reported in case histories. Sixteen accidents (or 41%) show discrepancies (in terms of fatalities) between the sources. Extrapolating the results of the “fatality” analysis to the other parameters, and supported by an analysis of selected cases, the general quality of information from accident case histories is evaluated. The result is a useful tool for assessing the quality of the various types of information. Using the terms “low”, “medium” and “high” to describe the quality, a table can be compiled. This tool shows that the information on date and place of the accident is of high quality, the event description and the number of casualties are of medium quality, and the information about chemical name and amount is of low quality.

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (16)

  • Research on the prediction model of hazardous chemical road transportation accidents

    2023, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
  • Risk assessment of hazardous materials transportation: A review of research progress in the last thirty years

    2022, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition)
  • A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents

    2011, Accident Analysis and Prevention
    Citation Excerpt :

    The case history research strategy is one of the most favorable strategies for accident studies. The vast majority of accident studies rely heavily on case histories (Haastrup and Brockhoff, 1991; Facchini and Brockhoff, 1992; Christou, 1999; Konstantinos and Ernestini, 2002). Studies based on historical data, which is one of the types of data most frequently used, are generally preferred (Carol et al., 2001).

  • Statistical analysis of domino chemical accidents

    2000, Journal of Hazardous Materials
  • Natural events and accidents with hazardous materials

    1995, Journal of Hazardous Materials
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text