Orderings for term-rewriting systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(82)90026-3Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Methods of proving that a term-rewriting system terminates are presented. They are based on the intuitive notion of ‘simplification orderings’, orderings in which any term that is syntactically simpler than another is smaller than the other. As a consequence of Kruskal's Tree Theorem, any nonterminating system must be self-embedding in the sense that it allows for the derivation of some term from a simpler one; thus termination is guaranteed if every rule in the system is a reduction in some simplification ordering.

Most of the orderings that have been used for proving termination are indeed simplication orderings; using this notion often allows for much easier proofs. A particularly useful class of simplification orderings, the ‘recursive path orderings’, is defined. Examples of the use of simplication orderings in termination proofs are given.

Cited by (0)

Research supported in part under NSF grants MCS 77-22830 and MCS 79-04897. A previous version of this paper appeared in the Proceedings of the Twentieth IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, October 1979.