Elsevier

Ultramicroscopy

Volume 62, Issues 1–2, January 1996, Pages 29-42
Ultramicroscopy

Regular contribution
On the many advantages of local-electrode atom probes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3991(95)00086-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Local extraction electrodes offer several crucial advantages for operation of atom probes. Because of the proximity of the local extraction electrode to the specimen, the electric field produced at the specimen apex by a given voltage is enhanced and the voltage required for field evaporation is reduced. In a voltage-pulsed atom probe, the absolute magnitude of the energy uncertainty is correspondingly reduced. High mass resolution (mΔm> 1000) may therefore be obtained by accelerating the evaporated ions to a greater total potential after the local extraction electrode. The low extraction voltage may also be pulsed rapidly (100 ps rise time) and at high repetition rates (up to 105 pulses per second) using currently available solid-state pulsers. Furthermore, a local electrode and intermediate electrodes may be used as optical elements to control the image magnification. All of these benefits may be applied to any type of atom probe. Local-electrode atom probes (LEAP) should be especially advantageous for developing three-dimensional atom probes with high mass resolution and a large field of view. A sample has been developed that consists of many microtips formed on a planar sample using ion beam mask etching. Microtip samples are especially suited to LEAP. Analysis of electrically insulating samples may also be possible with microtip samples in a LEAP. This combination of features suggests flexible, high speed, high mass resolution atom probes that can work with either conventional needle-shaped specimens or the new style of planar microtip specimens.

References (40)

  • B. Deconihout et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • A. Cerezo et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • O. Nishikawa et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1994)
  • S.S. Bajikar et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • I. Brodie et al.

    Adv. in Electronics and Elecron Phys.

    (1992)
  • D.J. Larson et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1996)
  • D.J. Larson et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1993)
  • S.S. Bajikar et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • D.J. Larson et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (1995)
  • J. Linders et al.

    Nuc. Instrum. Meth. B

    (1986)
  • O. Nishikawa et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1995)
  • R. Smith et al.

    J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.

    (1978)
  • E.W. Müller et al.

    Rev. Sci. Instrum.

    (1974)
  • S.V. Krishnaswamy et al.

    Rev. Sci. Instrum.

    (1974)
  • C.A. Spindt

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1968)
  • K.K. Chin et al.

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A

    (1990)
  • L. Yun-Peng et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1991)
  • C.A. Spindt et al.

    J. Appl. Phys.

    (1976)
  • C.A. Spindt

    Surf. Sci.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (120)

    • Tools and instrumentation

      2020, Chemistry of Nanomaterials: Fundamentals and Applications
    • Equilibrium composition variation of Q-phase precipitates in aluminum alloys

      2017, Acta Materialia
      Citation Excerpt :

      An ion beam of 30 kV was used in all milling steps with a post-sharpening step using a 5 kV ion-beam for Ga damage “cleanup”. All APT samples were run in laser pulsing mode local electrode atom probe tomography (LEAP) (Cameca, Madison, WI) [34,35] at the Northwestern University Center for Atom-Probe Tomography (NUCAPT). The specimen temperature was held between 30 and 50 K and the ps laser pulse energy was 40–50 pJ per pulse, at a rate of 500 kHz, with an evaporation rate of 0.5–5% depending on the quality of the tip.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text