Elsevier

World Development

Volume 20, Issue 1, January 1992, Pages 1-18
World Development

Indian informatics in the 1980s: The changing character of state involvement

https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(92)90133-GGet rights and content

Abstract

The 1980s liberalization of the Indian informatics industry took place in the context of continued high levels of state involvement, but there was evidence that the character of that involvement was changing. In the 1960s and 1970s the Indian state combined restrictive regulation with attempts to substitute state-owned for private production. Examining the changing role of central government regulatory agencies and state-owned enterprises in the informatics industry during the 1980s reveals tentative attempts to increase state actions aimed at complementing and promoting private entrepreneurship. Illustrative comparisons with state involvement in informatics in South Korea and Brazil suggest that this trajectory of change may have relevance beyond India.

References (77)

  • Werner Baer

    The Brazilian Economy

    (1989)
  • Pranab Bardhan

    The Political Economy of Development in India

    (1984)
  • BEL (Bharat Electronics Ltd.)

    Company brochure, 1989

    (1989)
  • BEL (Bharat Electronics Ltd.)

    34th Annual Report 1987–1988

    (1988)
  • BICP (Bureau of Industrial Costs and Prices, Government of India)

    Report on Electronics

    (1987)
  • C-DOT (Center for the Development of Telematics)

    C-DOT DSS: Family of digital switches, gateway to ISDN

    (1988)
  • C-DOT (Center for the Development of Telematics)

    Annual Report, 1985–1986

    (1986)
  • CMC (Computer Maintenance Corporation)

    IMPRESS: Railway passenger reservation system

    (1988)
  • CMC (Computer Maintenance Corporation)

    The Possibilities are Infinite (Twelfth Annual Report, 1987–1988)

    (1988)
  • Computers Today (India) (various...
  • Dataquest (India) (various...
  • Dataquest

    (1990)
  • Dataquest

    (1989)
  • Dataquest

    (1988)
  • DOE (Department of Electronics, Government of India)

    Annual Report, 1988–1989

    (1989)
  • DOE (Department of Electronics, Government of India)

    Annual Report, 1987–1988

    (1988)
  • DOE (Department of Electronics, Government of India)

    New Computer Policy

    Electronics Information and Planning

    (1984)
  • Charles Edquist et al.

    The integrated circuit industries of India and the Republic of Korea in an international techno-economic context

    Industry and Development

    (1987)
  • Electronics Korea (various...
  • Dennis Encarnation

    Dislodging the Multinationals: India's Strategy in Comparative Perspective

    (1989)
  • Peter B. Evans

    High Technology Industry in the Americas: Corporate Strategies and Government Policies

    (1989)
  • Peter B. Evans

    Predatory, developmental and other apparatuses: A comparative political economy perspective on the Third World state

    Sociological Forum

    (1989)
  • Peter B. Evans

    Reinventing the bourgeoisie: State entrepreneurship and class formation in dependent capitalist development

    American Journal of Sociology

    (1982)
  • Peter B. Evans

    Collectivizing capitalist accumulation: The social base of the development of Brazil's petrochemical complexes

  • Peter B. Evans

    Dependent Development: The Alliance of Multinational State and Local Capital in Brazil

    (1979)
  • Peter B. Evans et al.

    State structure and state policy: Implications of the Taiwanese case for newly industrializing countries

  • Peter B. Evans et al.

    Paths to participation in ‘hi-tech’ industry: A comparative analysis of computers in Brazil and Korea

    Asian Perspective

    (1989)
  • Kenneth Flamm

    Targeting the Computer

    (1987)
  • Cited by (32)

    • An evolutionary-institutional framework for the growth of an indigenous technology firms: The case of Lenovo computer

      2011, Technology in Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      These scholars proposed that there is a need to strike a balance among the three sectors, which implies that, developing indigenous technology firms may require all of them. Following prior research [14], which advised that focusing on a particular firm, rather than on aggregate macro economy, could help identify the specific institutional actors involved, and further expose the way by which they interact with each other, we undertake a longitudinal case study of Lenovo. We attempt to examine Lenovo’s evolution in light of the involvement of the three sectors by addressing the following research questions (as shown in the Fig. 1): what is the indigenous technology firm’s evolutionary process?

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Without the generously shared time of many executives and policy makers in both the public and private sector this paper could not have been written. In addition, my work was supported by a number of different institutions both in the United States and in India. A grant under the Indo-American Fellowship Program of the Indo-US Subcommission on Education and Culture made possible my fieldwork in India. Support was also provided by research funds from the University of California Pacific-Rim Research Program. The American Institute of Indian Studies provided crucial assistance during my stay in Delhi. Fellowships from the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation and the Center for the Advanced Study of the Behavioral Sciences and financial support from National Science Foundation Grant #BNS87-00864 gave me the time to do the initial write-up of the work. Support from the Latin American Institute of the University of New Mexico allowed me to complete it. None of those who shared their time, supported my work, or commented on it are, of course, in any way responsible for the interpretations I offer here.

    View full text