Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques in planning
Reference (121)
- et al.
How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method
European Journal of Operational Research
(1986) Ordinal Ranking and Preference strength
Mathematical Social Sciences
(1986)- et al.
Public values: multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making
On French location models for production units
Regional and Urban Economics
(1971)- et al.
Multi-criteria decision analysis as an aid to the strategic planning of energy R D
European Journal of Operational Research
(1986) - et al.
Methods for comparing policies using multiple criteria: an urban example
OMEGA, The International Journal of Management Science
(1982) - et al.
Some tests of analytical multiobjective decision-making methods
Socio-Economic Planning Sciences
(1982) - et al.
Sensitivity of the weighting summation decision method to incorrect application
Socio-Economic Planning Science
(1982) - et al.
Comparison of two decision-aid models applied to a nuclear power plant siting example
European Journal of Operational Research
(1986) - et al.
On the minimum violations ranking of a tournament
Management Science
(1986)
Whatever Happened to Planning?
An interactive multi-criteria decision model for spatial problems
East Lakes Geographer
Social Choice and Individual Values
Trouble in store
Area, Institute of British Geographers
Axiomatic Foundations for the Analytical Hierarchy Process
Systems Analysis in Urban Policy-Making and Planning
Rational collective choice
Scientific American
Preference structures I: distances between transitive preference relations
Journal Mathematical Society
Preference structures II: distances between asymmetric relations
SIAM, Journal of Applied Mathematics
Urban Planning Methods: Research and Policy Analysis
Eigenweight vectors and least-distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios
Journal of Optimization, Theory and Applications
A Multicriteria Methodology for Transportation Capital Investment Priority Setting: a critical analysis of the SELECTRA model
Relationships between 1' metrics on linear ranking spaces
SIAM, Journal of Applied Mathematics
Priority ranking and consensus formation
Management Science
On the Borda-Kendall consensus method for priority ranking problems
Management Science
Heuristics for Ranking Players in a Round Robin Tournament
A multicriteria model for ranking transportation projects: a case study
Systems Planning and Design, case studies in modelling, optimization and evaluation
Social Utilities
Use of multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making
Mixed scanning: a third approach to decision making
Public Administration Review
A comparative analysis of group decision methods
Behavioral Science
Simple voting systems and majority rule
Behavioral Science
Getting to Yes
Local Government and Strategic Choice
Multidimensional scaling: review and geographical applications
Disputes and Negotiations: a cross-cultural perspective
Policies for the location of large new stores — a case study
Area, Institute of British Geographers
Great Planning Disasters
The tragedy of the common
Human Judgement and Decision Making
The Urbanisation of Capital
Issues in productivity measurement for local governments
Public Administration Review
Cited by (133)
Suitable site selection for the development of solar based smart hydrogen energy plant in the Gangwon-do region, South Korea using big data: A geospatial approach
2023, International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyA robust method for avoiding rank reversal in the TOPSIS
2022, Computers and Industrial EngineeringSocial multi-criteria evaluation for managing biodiversity conservation conflicts
2021, Land Use PolicyCitation Excerpt :The number of alternatives and scenarios considered is of special importance when the scores of the impact matrix are aggregated using a mathematical algorithm (see Section 3.5), because it affects the number of iterations needed to obtain a ranking of alternatives and hence, can influence the final outcome of the MCE. According to Massam (1998), in a MCE context alternatives should cover at least: (i) the business as usual or status quo scenario, (ii) an “ideal’” best plan, (iii) a hypothetical “worst” plan and, (iv) a compromise solution or minimum satisfaction. In our case four alternatives (i.e., management plans) were considered based on the information gathered during the institutional analysis and additional meetings with experts from diverse areas (shepherds operating in nearby Navarre, researchers from diverse disciplines working in the area, and representatives from local and regional authorities, among others).
Joint analytical hierarchy and metaheuristic optimization as a framework to mitigate fertilizer-based pollution
2021, Journal of Environmental ManagementMulti-Criteria Decision Analysis
2021, International Encyclopedia of Transportation: Volume 1-7