Elsevier

Energy

Volume 15, Issue 11, November 1990, Pages 949-961
Energy

Application of stochastic dominance tests to utility resource planning under uncertainty

https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(90)90020-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Uncertainty and risk have become critical elements of electric-utility planning. Planning has become more complex because of uncertainties about future growth in electricity demand, cost and performance of new generating resources, performance of demand-side resources that increase end-use efficiencies, and overall structure and competition within electricity markets. Current methodologies for incorporating risk and uncertainty into planning are limited by their potential lack of consistency with economic theory, or the necessity to specify expected utility functions that are difficult to defend. In this paper, we describe these limitations and suggest a new approach to utility planning under uncertainty, called stochastic dominance, which can augment or, in some cases, replace existing methods to evaluate uncertainty. Stochastic dominance permits comparison of resource plans with uncertain performance in a theoretically consistent manner, without having to assess or justify individual expected utility functions. Stochastic dominance tests can also be implemented with little additional effort over current decision methodologies, especially those methodologies that rely on Monte-Carlo models as a planning tool. Stochastic dominance tests can incorporate alternative risk attitudes of decision makers more easily than existing empirical methods and therefore provide more robust solutions to decision making under uncertainty. The paper concludes with a demonstration of stochastic dominance applied to a resource-planning decision for a hypothetical utility.

References (22)

  • B. Hobbs et al.

    Energy

    (1990)
  • S. Wheatley

    J. Monet. Econ.

    (1988)
  • M. Hayes et al.

    Publ. Utilities Fortnightly

    (1987)
  • E. Hirst et al.

    Uncertainty in Long-Term Resource Planning for Electric Utilites

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL/CON-272

    (1988)
  • D. Duann

    Publ. Utilities Fortnightly

    (1989)
  • Northwest Power Planning Council (NPPC)

    1986 Northwest Conservation and Electric Power Plan

    (1986)
  • E. Hirst

    Benefits and Costs of Small, Short Lead-Time Power Plants and Demand-Side Programs in an Era of Load-Growth Uncertainty

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Report ORNL/CON-278

    (1989)
  • J. Lesser

    Renegotiating the Downstream Benefits of the Columbia River Treaty: an Application of Benefit-Cost Analysis Under Uncertainty

  • A. Briehpohl et al.

    Publ. Utilities Fortnightly

    (1985)
  • F. Knight

    Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit

    (1933)
  • N. Rau et al.

    Uncertainties and Risks in Electric Utility Resource Planning

  • Cited by (7)

    • Risk-based energy management of industrial buildings in smart cities and peer-to-peer electricity trading using second-order stochastic dominance procedure

      2022, Sustainable Cities and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Xin, Haiming, Yuan, & Weijuna, 2020, the disappointment almost stochastic dominance (DASD) method is used to solve multiple criteria decision making (SMCDM) problem. In addition, in reference (Lesser, 1990), the uncertainty and risk parameters have made the planning process more complex. In order to tackle this problem which affects the overall structure of the system within the electricity market, the stochastic dominance is taken into account.

    • Analysing decarbonizing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints

      2021, Energy Economics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The use of SSD constraints in modelling approaches in the field of power systems is not very extended. Lesser (1990) represents one of the first papers applying stochastic dominance tests to examine the planning alternatives of an electricity utility. Cheong et al. (2007) also undertake the investment problem of an electric company and apply SSD constraints to control the risk of the objective function.

    • Planning and scheduling under uncertainty: A review across multiple sectors

      2010, Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text